1 |
|
/****************************************************************************** |
2 |
|
* Top contributors (to current version): |
3 |
|
* Andrew Reynolds, Haniel Barbosa, Aina Niemetz |
4 |
|
* |
5 |
|
* This file is part of the cvc5 project. |
6 |
|
* |
7 |
|
* Copyright (c) 2009-2021 by the authors listed in the file AUTHORS |
8 |
|
* in the top-level source directory and their institutional affiliations. |
9 |
|
* All rights reserved. See the file COPYING in the top-level source |
10 |
|
* directory for licensing information. |
11 |
|
* **************************************************************************** |
12 |
|
* |
13 |
|
* Implementation of proof node manager. |
14 |
|
*/ |
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
#include "expr/proof_node_manager.h" |
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
#include <sstream> |
19 |
|
|
20 |
|
#include "expr/proof.h" |
21 |
|
#include "expr/proof_checker.h" |
22 |
|
#include "expr/proof_node.h" |
23 |
|
#include "expr/proof_node_algorithm.h" |
24 |
|
#include "options/proof_options.h" |
25 |
|
#include "theory/rewriter.h" |
26 |
|
|
27 |
|
using namespace cvc5::kind; |
28 |
|
|
29 |
|
namespace cvc5 { |
30 |
|
|
31 |
3600 |
ProofNodeManager::ProofNodeManager(ProofChecker* pc) |
32 |
3600 |
: d_checker(pc) |
33 |
|
{ |
34 |
3600 |
d_true = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkConst(true); |
35 |
3600 |
} |
36 |
|
|
37 |
19133680 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::mkNode( |
38 |
|
PfRule id, |
39 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, |
40 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args, |
41 |
|
Node expected) |
42 |
|
{ |
43 |
38267360 |
Trace("pnm") << "ProofNodeManager::mkNode " << id << " {" << expected.getId() |
44 |
19133680 |
<< "} " << expected << "\n"; |
45 |
38267360 |
Node res = checkInternal(id, children, args, expected); |
46 |
19133680 |
if (res.isNull()) |
47 |
|
{ |
48 |
|
// if it was invalid, then we return the null node |
49 |
|
return nullptr; |
50 |
|
} |
51 |
|
// otherwise construct the proof node and set its proven field |
52 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pn = |
53 |
38267360 |
std::make_shared<ProofNode>(id, children, args); |
54 |
19133680 |
pn->d_proven = res; |
55 |
19133680 |
return pn; |
56 |
|
} |
57 |
|
|
58 |
9754952 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::mkAssume(Node fact) |
59 |
|
{ |
60 |
9754952 |
Assert(!fact.isNull()); |
61 |
9754952 |
Assert(fact.getType().isBoolean()); |
62 |
9754952 |
return mkNode(PfRule::ASSUME, {}, {fact}, fact); |
63 |
|
} |
64 |
|
|
65 |
388 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::mkTrans( |
66 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, Node expected) |
67 |
|
{ |
68 |
388 |
Assert(!children.empty()); |
69 |
388 |
if (children.size() == 1) |
70 |
|
{ |
71 |
|
Assert(expected.isNull() || children[0]->getResult() == expected); |
72 |
|
return children[0]; |
73 |
|
} |
74 |
388 |
return mkNode(PfRule::TRANS, children, {}, expected); |
75 |
|
} |
76 |
|
|
77 |
181295 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::mkScope( |
78 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf, |
79 |
|
std::vector<Node>& assumps, |
80 |
|
bool ensureClosed, |
81 |
|
bool doMinimize, |
82 |
|
Node expected) |
83 |
|
{ |
84 |
181295 |
if (!ensureClosed) |
85 |
|
{ |
86 |
47533 |
return mkNode(PfRule::SCOPE, {pf}, assumps, expected); |
87 |
|
} |
88 |
133762 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << "ProofNodeManager::mkScope " << assumps << std::endl; |
89 |
|
// we first ensure the assumptions are flattened |
90 |
267524 |
std::unordered_set<Node> ac{assumps.begin(), assumps.end()}; |
91 |
|
// map from the rewritten form of assumptions to the original. This is only |
92 |
|
// computed in the rare case when we need rewriting to match the |
93 |
|
// assumptions. An example of this is for Boolean constant equalities in |
94 |
|
// scoped proofs from the proof equality engine. |
95 |
267524 |
std::unordered_map<Node, Node> acr; |
96 |
|
// whether we have compute the map above |
97 |
133762 |
bool computedAcr = false; |
98 |
|
|
99 |
|
// The free assumptions of the proof |
100 |
267524 |
std::map<Node, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>> famap; |
101 |
133762 |
expr::getFreeAssumptionsMap(pf, famap); |
102 |
267524 |
std::unordered_set<Node> acu; |
103 |
594345 |
for (const std::pair<const Node, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>>& |
104 |
133762 |
fa : famap) |
105 |
|
{ |
106 |
1188690 |
Node a = fa.first; |
107 |
1037949 |
if (ac.find(a) != ac.end()) |
108 |
|
{ |
109 |
|
// already covered by an assumption |
110 |
443604 |
acu.insert(a); |
111 |
443604 |
continue; |
112 |
|
} |
113 |
|
// trivial assumption |
114 |
150741 |
if (a == d_true) |
115 |
|
{ |
116 |
|
Trace("pnm-scope") << "- justify trivial True assumption\n"; |
117 |
|
for (std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pfs : fa.second) |
118 |
|
{ |
119 |
|
Assert(pfs->getResult() == a); |
120 |
|
updateNode(pfs.get(), PfRule::MACRO_SR_PRED_INTRO, {}, {a}); |
121 |
|
} |
122 |
|
Trace("pnm-scope") << "...finished" << std::endl; |
123 |
|
acu.insert(a); |
124 |
|
continue; |
125 |
|
} |
126 |
150741 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << "- try matching free assumption " << a << "\n"; |
127 |
|
// otherwise it may be due to symmetry? |
128 |
301482 |
Node aeqSym = CDProof::getSymmFact(a); |
129 |
150741 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << " - try sym " << aeqSym << "\n"; |
130 |
301482 |
Node aMatch; |
131 |
150741 |
if (!aeqSym.isNull() && ac.count(aeqSym)) |
132 |
|
{ |
133 |
301054 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << "- reorient assumption " << aeqSym << " via " << a |
134 |
301054 |
<< " for " << fa.second.size() << " proof nodes" |
135 |
150527 |
<< std::endl; |
136 |
150527 |
aMatch = aeqSym; |
137 |
|
} |
138 |
|
else |
139 |
|
{ |
140 |
|
// Otherwise, may be derivable by rewriting. Note this is used in |
141 |
|
// ensuring that proofs from the proof equality engine that involve |
142 |
|
// equality with Boolean constants are closed. |
143 |
214 |
if (!computedAcr) |
144 |
|
{ |
145 |
89 |
computedAcr = true; |
146 |
1092 |
for (const Node& acc : ac) |
147 |
|
{ |
148 |
2006 |
Node accr = theory::Rewriter::rewrite(acc); |
149 |
1003 |
if (accr != acc) |
150 |
|
{ |
151 |
403 |
acr[accr] = acc; |
152 |
|
} |
153 |
|
} |
154 |
|
} |
155 |
428 |
Node ar = theory::Rewriter::rewrite(a); |
156 |
214 |
std::unordered_map<Node, Node>::iterator itr = acr.find(ar); |
157 |
214 |
if (itr != acr.end()) |
158 |
|
{ |
159 |
214 |
aMatch = itr->second; |
160 |
|
} |
161 |
|
} |
162 |
|
|
163 |
|
// if we found a match either by symmetry or rewriting, then we connect |
164 |
|
// the assumption here. |
165 |
150741 |
if (!aMatch.isNull()) |
166 |
|
{ |
167 |
301482 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pfaa = mkAssume(aMatch); |
168 |
|
// must correct the orientation on this leaf |
169 |
301482 |
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>> children; |
170 |
150741 |
children.push_back(pfaa); |
171 |
301482 |
for (std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pfs : fa.second) |
172 |
|
{ |
173 |
150741 |
Assert(pfs->getResult() == a); |
174 |
|
// use SYMM if possible |
175 |
150741 |
if (aMatch == aeqSym) |
176 |
|
{ |
177 |
150527 |
updateNode(pfs.get(), PfRule::SYMM, children, {}); |
178 |
|
} |
179 |
|
else |
180 |
|
{ |
181 |
214 |
updateNode(pfs.get(), PfRule::MACRO_SR_PRED_TRANSFORM, children, {a}); |
182 |
|
} |
183 |
|
} |
184 |
150741 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << "...finished" << std::endl; |
185 |
150741 |
acu.insert(aMatch); |
186 |
150741 |
continue; |
187 |
|
} |
188 |
|
// If we did not find a match, it is an error, since all free assumptions |
189 |
|
// should be arguments to SCOPE. |
190 |
|
std::stringstream ss; |
191 |
|
|
192 |
|
bool dumpProofTraceOn = Trace.isOn("dump-proof-error"); |
193 |
|
if (dumpProofTraceOn) |
194 |
|
{ |
195 |
|
ss << "The proof : " << *pf << std::endl; |
196 |
|
} |
197 |
|
ss << std::endl << "Free assumption: " << a << std::endl; |
198 |
|
for (const Node& aprint : ac) |
199 |
|
{ |
200 |
|
ss << "- assumption: " << aprint << std::endl; |
201 |
|
} |
202 |
|
if (!dumpProofTraceOn) |
203 |
|
{ |
204 |
|
ss << "Use -t dump-proof-error for details on proof" << std::endl; |
205 |
|
} |
206 |
|
Unreachable() << "Generated a proof that is not closed by the scope: " |
207 |
|
<< ss.str() << std::endl; |
208 |
|
} |
209 |
133762 |
if (acu.size() < ac.size()) |
210 |
|
{ |
211 |
|
// All assumptions should match a free assumption; if one does not, then |
212 |
|
// the explanation could have been smaller. |
213 |
22330 |
for (const Node& a : ac) |
214 |
|
{ |
215 |
17602 |
if (acu.find(a) == acu.end()) |
216 |
|
{ |
217 |
5075 |
Notice() << "ProofNodeManager::mkScope: assumption " << a |
218 |
|
<< " does not match a free assumption in proof" << std::endl; |
219 |
|
} |
220 |
|
} |
221 |
|
} |
222 |
133762 |
if (doMinimize && acu.size() < ac.size()) |
223 |
|
{ |
224 |
4706 |
assumps.clear(); |
225 |
4706 |
assumps.insert(assumps.end(), acu.begin(), acu.end()); |
226 |
|
} |
227 |
129056 |
else if (ac.size() < assumps.size()) |
228 |
|
{ |
229 |
|
// remove duplicates to avoid redundant literals in clauses |
230 |
38 |
assumps.clear(); |
231 |
38 |
assumps.insert(assumps.end(), ac.begin(), ac.end()); |
232 |
|
} |
233 |
267524 |
Node minExpected; |
234 |
133762 |
NodeManager* nm = NodeManager::currentNM(); |
235 |
267524 |
Node exp; |
236 |
133762 |
if (assumps.empty()) |
237 |
|
{ |
238 |
|
// SCOPE with no arguments is a no-op, just return original |
239 |
1223 |
return pf; |
240 |
|
} |
241 |
265078 |
Node conc = pf->getResult(); |
242 |
132539 |
exp = assumps.size() == 1 ? assumps[0] : nm->mkNode(AND, assumps); |
243 |
132539 |
if (conc.isConst() && !conc.getConst<bool>()) |
244 |
|
{ |
245 |
38153 |
minExpected = exp.notNode(); |
246 |
|
} |
247 |
|
else |
248 |
|
{ |
249 |
94386 |
minExpected = nm->mkNode(IMPLIES, exp, conc); |
250 |
|
} |
251 |
132539 |
return mkNode(PfRule::SCOPE, {pf}, assumps, minExpected); |
252 |
|
} |
253 |
|
|
254 |
212744 |
bool ProofNodeManager::updateNode( |
255 |
|
ProofNode* pn, |
256 |
|
PfRule id, |
257 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, |
258 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args) |
259 |
|
{ |
260 |
212744 |
return updateNodeInternal(pn, id, children, args, true); |
261 |
|
} |
262 |
|
|
263 |
3018511 |
bool ProofNodeManager::updateNode(ProofNode* pn, ProofNode* pnr) |
264 |
|
{ |
265 |
3018511 |
Assert(pn != nullptr); |
266 |
3018511 |
Assert(pnr != nullptr); |
267 |
3018511 |
if (pn->getResult() != pnr->getResult()) |
268 |
|
{ |
269 |
|
return false; |
270 |
|
} |
271 |
|
// can shortcut re-check of rule |
272 |
3018511 |
return updateNodeInternal( |
273 |
3018511 |
pn, pnr->getRule(), pnr->getChildren(), pnr->getArguments(), false); |
274 |
|
} |
275 |
|
|
276 |
19346424 |
Node ProofNodeManager::checkInternal( |
277 |
|
PfRule id, |
278 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, |
279 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args, |
280 |
|
Node expected) |
281 |
|
{ |
282 |
19346424 |
Node res; |
283 |
19346424 |
if (d_checker) |
284 |
|
{ |
285 |
|
// check with the checker, which takes expected as argument |
286 |
19346424 |
res = d_checker->check(id, children, args, expected); |
287 |
19346424 |
Assert(!res.isNull()) |
288 |
|
<< "ProofNodeManager::checkInternal: failed to check proof"; |
289 |
|
} |
290 |
|
else |
291 |
|
{ |
292 |
|
// otherwise we trust the expected value, if it exists |
293 |
|
Assert(!expected.isNull()) << "ProofNodeManager::checkInternal: no checker " |
294 |
|
"or expected value provided"; |
295 |
|
res = expected; |
296 |
|
} |
297 |
19346424 |
return res; |
298 |
|
} |
299 |
|
|
300 |
10908963 |
ProofChecker* ProofNodeManager::getChecker() const { return d_checker; } |
301 |
|
|
302 |
73325 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::clone( |
303 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pn) |
304 |
|
{ |
305 |
73325 |
const ProofNode* orig = pn.get(); |
306 |
146650 |
std::unordered_map<const ProofNode*, std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>> visited; |
307 |
73325 |
std::unordered_map<const ProofNode*, std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>::iterator it; |
308 |
146650 |
std::vector<const ProofNode*> visit; |
309 |
146650 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> cloned; |
310 |
73325 |
visit.push_back(orig); |
311 |
|
const ProofNode* cur; |
312 |
5012801 |
while (!visit.empty()) |
313 |
|
{ |
314 |
2469738 |
cur = visit.back(); |
315 |
2469738 |
it = visited.find(cur); |
316 |
2469738 |
if (it == visited.end()) |
317 |
|
{ |
318 |
1138366 |
visited[cur] = nullptr; |
319 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children = |
320 |
1138366 |
cur->getChildren(); |
321 |
2396413 |
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cp : children) |
322 |
|
{ |
323 |
1258047 |
visit.push_back(cp.get()); |
324 |
|
} |
325 |
1138366 |
continue; |
326 |
|
} |
327 |
1331372 |
visit.pop_back(); |
328 |
1331372 |
if (it->second.get() == nullptr) |
329 |
|
{ |
330 |
2276732 |
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>> cchildren; |
331 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children = |
332 |
1138366 |
cur->getChildren(); |
333 |
2396413 |
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cp : children) |
334 |
|
{ |
335 |
1258047 |
it = visited.find(cp.get()); |
336 |
1258047 |
Assert(it != visited.end()); |
337 |
1258047 |
Assert(it->second != nullptr); |
338 |
1258047 |
cchildren.push_back(it->second); |
339 |
|
} |
340 |
2276732 |
cloned = std::make_shared<ProofNode>( |
341 |
2276732 |
cur->getRule(), cchildren, cur->getArguments()); |
342 |
1138366 |
visited[cur] = cloned; |
343 |
|
// we trust the above cloning does not change what is proven |
344 |
1138366 |
cloned->d_proven = cur->d_proven; |
345 |
|
} |
346 |
|
} |
347 |
73325 |
Assert(visited.find(orig) != visited.end()); |
348 |
146650 |
return visited[orig]; |
349 |
|
} |
350 |
|
|
351 |
3231255 |
bool ProofNodeManager::updateNodeInternal( |
352 |
|
ProofNode* pn, |
353 |
|
PfRule id, |
354 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, |
355 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args, |
356 |
|
bool needsCheck) |
357 |
|
{ |
358 |
3231255 |
Assert(pn != nullptr); |
359 |
|
// ---------------- check for cyclic |
360 |
3231255 |
if (options::proofEagerChecking()) |
361 |
|
{ |
362 |
|
std::unordered_set<const ProofNode*> visited; |
363 |
|
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cpc : children) |
364 |
|
{ |
365 |
|
if (expr::containsSubproof(cpc.get(), pn, visited)) |
366 |
|
{ |
367 |
|
std::stringstream ss; |
368 |
|
ss << "ProofNodeManager::updateNode: attempting to make cyclic proof! " |
369 |
|
<< id << " " << pn->getResult() << ", children = " << std::endl; |
370 |
|
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cp : children) |
371 |
|
{ |
372 |
|
ss << " " << cp->getRule() << " " << cp->getResult() << std::endl; |
373 |
|
} |
374 |
|
ss << "Full children:" << std::endl; |
375 |
|
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cp : children) |
376 |
|
{ |
377 |
|
ss << " - "; |
378 |
|
cp->printDebug(ss); |
379 |
|
ss << std::endl; |
380 |
|
} |
381 |
|
Unreachable() << ss.str(); |
382 |
|
} |
383 |
|
} |
384 |
|
} |
385 |
|
// ---------------- end check for cyclic |
386 |
|
|
387 |
|
// should have already computed what is proven |
388 |
3231255 |
Assert(!pn->d_proven.isNull()) |
389 |
|
<< "ProofNodeManager::updateProofNode: invalid proof provided"; |
390 |
3231255 |
if (needsCheck) |
391 |
|
{ |
392 |
|
// We expect to prove the same thing as before |
393 |
425488 |
Node res = checkInternal(id, children, args, pn->d_proven); |
394 |
212744 |
if (res.isNull()) |
395 |
|
{ |
396 |
|
// if it was invalid, then we do not update |
397 |
|
return false; |
398 |
|
} |
399 |
|
// proven field should already be the same as the result |
400 |
212744 |
Assert(res == pn->d_proven); |
401 |
|
} |
402 |
|
|
403 |
|
// we update its value |
404 |
3231255 |
pn->setValue(id, children, args); |
405 |
3231255 |
return true; |
406 |
|
} |
407 |
|
|
408 |
28191 |
} // namespace cvc5 |