1 |
|
/****************************************************************************** |
2 |
|
* Top contributors (to current version): |
3 |
|
* Andrew Reynolds, Alex Ozdemir |
4 |
|
* |
5 |
|
* This file is part of the cvc5 project. |
6 |
|
* |
7 |
|
* Copyright (c) 2009-2021 by the authors listed in the file AUTHORS |
8 |
|
* in the top-level source directory and their institutional affiliations. |
9 |
|
* All rights reserved. See the file COPYING in the top-level source |
10 |
|
* directory for licensing information. |
11 |
|
* **************************************************************************** |
12 |
|
* |
13 |
|
* Implementation of the abstract proof generator class. |
14 |
|
*/ |
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
#include "theory/eager_proof_generator.h" |
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
#include "expr/proof.h" |
19 |
|
#include "expr/proof_node.h" |
20 |
|
#include "expr/proof_node_manager.h" |
21 |
|
|
22 |
|
namespace cvc5 { |
23 |
|
namespace theory { |
24 |
|
|
25 |
68288 |
EagerProofGenerator::EagerProofGenerator(ProofNodeManager* pnm, |
26 |
|
context::Context* c, |
27 |
68288 |
std::string name) |
28 |
68288 |
: d_pnm(pnm), d_name(name), d_proofs(c == nullptr ? &d_context : c) |
29 |
|
{ |
30 |
68288 |
} |
31 |
|
|
32 |
357361 |
void EagerProofGenerator::setProofFor(Node f, std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf) |
33 |
|
{ |
34 |
|
// pf should prove f |
35 |
714722 |
Assert(pf->getResult() == f) |
36 |
|
<< "EagerProofGenerator::setProofFor: unexpected result" << std::endl |
37 |
357361 |
<< "Expected: " << f << std::endl |
38 |
357361 |
<< "Actual: " << pf->getResult() << std::endl; |
39 |
357361 |
d_proofs[f] = pf; |
40 |
357361 |
} |
41 |
15542 |
void EagerProofGenerator::setProofForConflict(Node conf, |
42 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf) |
43 |
|
{ |
44 |
|
// Normalize based on key |
45 |
31084 |
Node ckey = TrustNode::getConflictProven(conf); |
46 |
15542 |
setProofFor(ckey, pf); |
47 |
15542 |
} |
48 |
|
|
49 |
209663 |
void EagerProofGenerator::setProofForLemma(Node lem, |
50 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf) |
51 |
|
{ |
52 |
|
// Normalize based on key |
53 |
419326 |
Node lkey = TrustNode::getLemmaProven(lem); |
54 |
209663 |
setProofFor(lkey, pf); |
55 |
209663 |
} |
56 |
|
|
57 |
70400 |
void EagerProofGenerator::setProofForPropExp(TNode lit, |
58 |
|
Node exp, |
59 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf) |
60 |
|
{ |
61 |
|
// Normalize based on key |
62 |
140800 |
Node pekey = TrustNode::getPropExpProven(lit, exp); |
63 |
70400 |
setProofFor(pekey, pf); |
64 |
70400 |
} |
65 |
|
|
66 |
151470 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> EagerProofGenerator::getProofFor(Node f) |
67 |
|
{ |
68 |
151470 |
NodeProofNodeMap::iterator it = d_proofs.find(f); |
69 |
151470 |
if (it == d_proofs.end()) |
70 |
|
{ |
71 |
2369 |
return nullptr; |
72 |
|
} |
73 |
149101 |
return (*it).second; |
74 |
|
} |
75 |
|
|
76 |
804052 |
bool EagerProofGenerator::hasProofFor(Node f) |
77 |
|
{ |
78 |
804052 |
return d_proofs.find(f) != d_proofs.end(); |
79 |
|
} |
80 |
|
|
81 |
220181 |
TrustNode EagerProofGenerator::mkTrustNode(Node n, |
82 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf, |
83 |
|
bool isConflict) |
84 |
|
{ |
85 |
220181 |
if (pf == nullptr) |
86 |
|
{ |
87 |
|
return TrustNode::null(); |
88 |
|
} |
89 |
220181 |
if (isConflict) |
90 |
|
{ |
91 |
|
// this shouldnt modify the key |
92 |
11465 |
setProofForConflict(n, pf); |
93 |
|
// we can now return the trust node |
94 |
11465 |
return TrustNode::mkTrustConflict(n, this); |
95 |
|
} |
96 |
|
// this shouldnt modify the key |
97 |
208716 |
setProofForLemma(n, pf); |
98 |
|
// we can now return the trust node |
99 |
208716 |
return TrustNode::mkTrustLemma(n, this); |
100 |
|
} |
101 |
|
|
102 |
12766 |
TrustNode EagerProofGenerator::mkTrustNode(Node conc, |
103 |
|
PfRule id, |
104 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& exp, |
105 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args, |
106 |
|
bool isConflict) |
107 |
|
{ |
108 |
|
// if no children, its easy |
109 |
12766 |
if (exp.empty()) |
110 |
|
{ |
111 |
24638 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf = d_pnm->mkNode(id, {}, args, conc); |
112 |
12319 |
return mkTrustNode(conc, pf, isConflict); |
113 |
|
} |
114 |
|
// otherwise, we use CDProof + SCOPE |
115 |
894 |
CDProof cdp(d_pnm); |
116 |
447 |
cdp.addStep(conc, id, exp, args); |
117 |
894 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf = cdp.getProofFor(conc); |
118 |
|
// We use mkNode instead of mkScope, since there is no reason to check |
119 |
|
// whether the free assumptions of pf are in exp, since they are by the |
120 |
|
// construction above. |
121 |
894 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pfs = d_pnm->mkNode(PfRule::SCOPE, {pf}, exp); |
122 |
447 |
return mkTrustNode(pfs->getResult(), pfs, isConflict); |
123 |
|
} |
124 |
|
|
125 |
3404 |
TrustNode EagerProofGenerator::mkTrustedRewrite( |
126 |
|
Node a, Node b, std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf) |
127 |
|
{ |
128 |
3404 |
if (pf == nullptr) |
129 |
|
{ |
130 |
|
return TrustNode::null(); |
131 |
|
} |
132 |
6808 |
Node eq = a.eqNode(b); |
133 |
3404 |
setProofFor(eq, pf); |
134 |
3404 |
return TrustNode::mkTrustRewrite(a, b, this); |
135 |
|
} |
136 |
|
|
137 |
2099 |
TrustNode EagerProofGenerator::mkTrustedPropagation( |
138 |
|
Node n, Node exp, std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf) |
139 |
|
{ |
140 |
2099 |
if (pf == nullptr) |
141 |
|
{ |
142 |
|
return TrustNode::null(); |
143 |
|
} |
144 |
2099 |
setProofForPropExp(n, exp, pf); |
145 |
2099 |
return TrustNode::mkTrustPropExp(n, exp, this); |
146 |
|
} |
147 |
|
|
148 |
9864 |
TrustNode EagerProofGenerator::mkTrustNodeSplit(Node f) |
149 |
|
{ |
150 |
|
// make the lemma |
151 |
19728 |
Node lem = f.orNode(f.notNode()); |
152 |
19728 |
return mkTrustNode(lem, PfRule::SPLIT, {}, {f}, false); |
153 |
|
} |
154 |
|
|
155 |
278357 |
std::string EagerProofGenerator::identify() const { return d_name; } |
156 |
|
|
157 |
|
} // namespace theory |
158 |
28191 |
} // namespace cvc5 |