1 |
|
/****************************************************************************** |
2 |
|
* Top contributors (to current version): |
3 |
|
* Tim King, Aina Niemetz, Morgan Deters |
4 |
|
* |
5 |
|
* This file is part of the cvc5 project. |
6 |
|
* |
7 |
|
* Copyright (c) 2009-2021 by the authors listed in the file AUTHORS |
8 |
|
* in the top-level source directory and their institutional affiliations. |
9 |
|
* All rights reserved. See the file COPYING in the top-level source |
10 |
|
* directory for licensing information. |
11 |
|
* **************************************************************************** |
12 |
|
* |
13 |
|
* This is an implementation of the Simplex Module for the Simplex for |
14 |
|
* DPLL(T) decision procedure. |
15 |
|
*/ |
16 |
|
#include "theory/arith/soi_simplex.h" |
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
#include <algorithm> |
19 |
|
|
20 |
|
#include "base/output.h" |
21 |
|
#include "options/arith_options.h" |
22 |
|
#include "smt/smt_statistics_registry.h" |
23 |
|
#include "theory/arith/constraint.h" |
24 |
|
#include "theory/arith/error_set.h" |
25 |
|
#include "theory/arith/tableau.h" |
26 |
|
#include "util/statistics_stats.h" |
27 |
|
|
28 |
|
using namespace std; |
29 |
|
|
30 |
|
namespace cvc5 { |
31 |
|
namespace theory { |
32 |
|
namespace arith { |
33 |
|
|
34 |
9841 |
SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD(LinearEqualityModule& linEq, |
35 |
|
ErrorSet& errors, |
36 |
|
RaiseConflict conflictChannel, |
37 |
9841 |
TempVarMalloc tvmalloc) |
38 |
|
: SimplexDecisionProcedure(linEq, errors, conflictChannel, tvmalloc), |
39 |
|
d_soiVar(ARITHVAR_SENTINEL), |
40 |
|
d_pivotBudget(0), |
41 |
|
d_prevWitnessImprovement(AntiProductive), |
42 |
|
d_witnessImprovementInARow(0), |
43 |
|
d_sgnDisagreements(), |
44 |
9841 |
d_statistics("theory::arith::SOI", d_pivots) |
45 |
9841 |
{ } |
46 |
|
|
47 |
9841 |
SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::Statistics::Statistics(const std::string& name, |
48 |
9841 |
uint32_t& pivots) |
49 |
|
: d_initialSignalsTime( |
50 |
19682 |
smtStatisticsRegistry().registerTimer(name + "initialProcessTime")), |
51 |
|
d_initialConflicts( |
52 |
19682 |
smtStatisticsRegistry().registerInt(name + "UpdateConflicts")), |
53 |
19682 |
d_soiFoundUnsat(smtStatisticsRegistry().registerInt(name + "FoundUnsat")), |
54 |
19682 |
d_soiFoundSat(smtStatisticsRegistry().registerInt(name + "FoundSat")), |
55 |
19682 |
d_soiMissed(smtStatisticsRegistry().registerInt(name + "Missed")), |
56 |
|
d_soiConflicts( |
57 |
19682 |
smtStatisticsRegistry().registerInt(name + "ConfMin::num")), |
58 |
|
d_hasToBeMinimal( |
59 |
19682 |
smtStatisticsRegistry().registerInt(name + "HasToBeMin")), |
60 |
|
d_maybeNotMinimal( |
61 |
19682 |
smtStatisticsRegistry().registerInt(name + "MaybeNotMin")), |
62 |
19682 |
d_soiTimer(smtStatisticsRegistry().registerTimer(name + "Time")), |
63 |
|
d_soiFocusConstructionTimer( |
64 |
19682 |
smtStatisticsRegistry().registerTimer(name + "Construction")), |
65 |
9841 |
d_soiConflictMinimization(smtStatisticsRegistry().registerTimer( |
66 |
19682 |
name + "Conflict::Minimization")), |
67 |
|
d_selectUpdateForSOI( |
68 |
19682 |
smtStatisticsRegistry().registerTimer(name + "selectSOI")), |
69 |
|
d_finalCheckPivotCounter( |
70 |
9841 |
smtStatisticsRegistry().registerReference<uint32_t>( |
71 |
127933 |
name + "lastPivots", pivots)) |
72 |
|
{ |
73 |
9841 |
} |
74 |
|
|
75 |
|
Result::Sat SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::findModel(bool exactResult){ |
76 |
|
Assert(d_conflictVariables.empty()); |
77 |
|
Assert(d_sgnDisagreements.empty()); |
78 |
|
|
79 |
|
d_pivots = 0; |
80 |
|
static thread_local unsigned int instance = 0; |
81 |
|
instance = instance + 1; |
82 |
|
static const bool verbose = false; |
83 |
|
|
84 |
|
if(d_errorSet.errorEmpty() && !d_errorSet.moreSignals()){ |
85 |
|
Debug("soi::findModel") << "soiFindModel("<< instance <<") trivial" << endl; |
86 |
|
Assert(d_conflictVariables.empty()); |
87 |
|
return Result::SAT; |
88 |
|
} |
89 |
|
|
90 |
|
// We need to reduce this because of |
91 |
|
d_errorSet.reduceToSignals(); |
92 |
|
|
93 |
|
// We must start tracking NOW |
94 |
|
d_errorSet.setSelectionRule(options::ErrorSelectionRule::SUM_METRIC); |
95 |
|
|
96 |
|
if(initialProcessSignals()){ |
97 |
|
d_conflictVariables.purge(); |
98 |
|
if (verbose) |
99 |
|
{ |
100 |
|
CVC5Message() << "fcFindModel(" << instance << ") early conflict" << endl; |
101 |
|
} |
102 |
|
Debug("soi::findModel") << "fcFindModel("<< instance <<") early conflict" << endl; |
103 |
|
Assert(d_conflictVariables.empty()); |
104 |
|
return Result::UNSAT; |
105 |
|
}else if(d_errorSet.errorEmpty()){ |
106 |
|
Debug("soi::findModel") << "fcFindModel("<< instance <<") fixed itself" << endl; |
107 |
|
Assert(!d_errorSet.moreSignals()); |
108 |
|
Assert(d_conflictVariables.empty()); |
109 |
|
return Result::SAT; |
110 |
|
} |
111 |
|
|
112 |
|
Debug("soi::findModel") << "fcFindModel(" << instance <<") start non-trivial" << endl; |
113 |
|
|
114 |
|
exactResult |= options::arithStandardCheckVarOrderPivots() < 0; |
115 |
|
|
116 |
|
d_prevWitnessImprovement = HeuristicDegenerate; |
117 |
|
d_witnessImprovementInARow = 0; |
118 |
|
|
119 |
|
Result::Sat result = Result::SAT_UNKNOWN; |
120 |
|
|
121 |
|
if(result == Result::SAT_UNKNOWN){ |
122 |
|
if(exactResult){ |
123 |
|
d_pivotBudget = -1; |
124 |
|
}else{ |
125 |
|
d_pivotBudget = options::arithStandardCheckVarOrderPivots(); |
126 |
|
} |
127 |
|
|
128 |
|
result = sumOfInfeasibilities(); |
129 |
|
|
130 |
|
if(result == Result::UNSAT){ |
131 |
|
++(d_statistics.d_soiFoundUnsat); |
132 |
|
if (verbose) |
133 |
|
{ |
134 |
|
CVC5Message() << "fc found unsat"; |
135 |
|
} |
136 |
|
}else if(d_errorSet.errorEmpty()){ |
137 |
|
++(d_statistics.d_soiFoundSat); |
138 |
|
if (verbose) |
139 |
|
{ |
140 |
|
CVC5Message() << "fc found model"; |
141 |
|
} |
142 |
|
}else{ |
143 |
|
++(d_statistics.d_soiMissed); |
144 |
|
if (verbose) |
145 |
|
{ |
146 |
|
CVC5Message() << "fc missed"; |
147 |
|
} |
148 |
|
} |
149 |
|
} |
150 |
|
if (verbose) |
151 |
|
{ |
152 |
|
CVC5Message() << "(" << instance << ") pivots " << d_pivots << endl; |
153 |
|
} |
154 |
|
|
155 |
|
Assert(!d_errorSet.moreSignals()); |
156 |
|
if(result == Result::SAT_UNKNOWN && d_errorSet.errorEmpty()){ |
157 |
|
result = Result::SAT; |
158 |
|
} |
159 |
|
|
160 |
|
// ensure that the conflict variable is still in the queue. |
161 |
|
d_conflictVariables.purge(); |
162 |
|
|
163 |
|
Debug("soi::findModel") << "end findModel() " << instance << " " << result << endl; |
164 |
|
|
165 |
|
Assert(d_conflictVariables.empty()); |
166 |
|
return result; |
167 |
|
} |
168 |
|
|
169 |
|
|
170 |
|
void SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::logPivot(WitnessImprovement w){ |
171 |
|
if(d_pivotBudget > 0) { |
172 |
|
--d_pivotBudget; |
173 |
|
} |
174 |
|
Assert(w != AntiProductive); |
175 |
|
|
176 |
|
if(w == d_prevWitnessImprovement){ |
177 |
|
++d_witnessImprovementInARow; |
178 |
|
if(d_witnessImprovementInARow == 0){ |
179 |
|
--d_witnessImprovementInARow; |
180 |
|
} |
181 |
|
}else{ |
182 |
|
if(w != BlandsDegenerate){ |
183 |
|
d_witnessImprovementInARow = 1; |
184 |
|
} |
185 |
|
d_prevWitnessImprovement = w; |
186 |
|
} |
187 |
|
if(strongImprovement(w)){ |
188 |
|
d_leavingCountSinceImprovement.purge(); |
189 |
|
} |
190 |
|
|
191 |
|
Debug("logPivot") << "logPivot " << d_prevWitnessImprovement << " " << d_witnessImprovementInARow << endl; |
192 |
|
} |
193 |
|
|
194 |
|
uint32_t SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::degeneratePivotsInARow() const { |
195 |
|
switch(d_prevWitnessImprovement){ |
196 |
|
case ConflictFound: |
197 |
|
case ErrorDropped: |
198 |
|
case FocusImproved: |
199 |
|
return 0; |
200 |
|
case HeuristicDegenerate: |
201 |
|
case BlandsDegenerate: |
202 |
|
return d_witnessImprovementInARow; |
203 |
|
// Degenerate is unreachable for its own reasons |
204 |
|
case Degenerate: |
205 |
|
case FocusShrank: |
206 |
|
case AntiProductive: |
207 |
|
Unreachable(); |
208 |
|
return -1; |
209 |
|
} |
210 |
|
Unreachable(); |
211 |
|
} |
212 |
|
|
213 |
|
void SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::adjustFocusAndError(const UpdateInfo& up, const AVIntPairVec& focusChanges){ |
214 |
|
uint32_t newErrorSize = d_errorSet.errorSize(); |
215 |
|
adjustInfeasFunc(d_statistics.d_soiFocusConstructionTimer, d_soiVar, focusChanges); |
216 |
|
d_errorSize = newErrorSize; |
217 |
|
} |
218 |
|
|
219 |
|
|
220 |
|
UpdateInfo SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::selectUpdate(LinearEqualityModule::UpdatePreferenceFunction upf, LinearEqualityModule::VarPreferenceFunction bpf) { |
221 |
|
UpdateInfo selected; |
222 |
|
|
223 |
|
static int instance = 0 ; |
224 |
|
++instance; |
225 |
|
|
226 |
|
Debug("soi::selectPrimalUpdate") |
227 |
|
<< "selectPrimalUpdate " << instance << endl |
228 |
|
<< d_soiVar << " " << d_tableau.basicRowLength(d_soiVar) |
229 |
|
<< " " << d_linEq.debugBasicAtBoundCount(d_soiVar) << endl; |
230 |
|
|
231 |
|
typedef std::vector<Cand> CandVector; |
232 |
|
CandVector candidates; |
233 |
|
|
234 |
|
for(Tableau::RowIterator ri = d_tableau.basicRowIterator(d_soiVar); !ri.atEnd(); ++ri){ |
235 |
|
const Tableau::Entry& e = *ri; |
236 |
|
ArithVar curr = e.getColVar(); |
237 |
|
if(curr == d_soiVar){ continue; } |
238 |
|
|
239 |
|
int sgn = e.getCoefficient().sgn(); |
240 |
|
bool candidate = |
241 |
|
(sgn > 0 && d_variables.cmpAssignmentUpperBound(curr) < 0) || |
242 |
|
(sgn < 0 && d_variables.cmpAssignmentLowerBound(curr) > 0); |
243 |
|
|
244 |
|
Debug("soi::selectPrimalUpdate") |
245 |
|
<< "storing " << d_soiVar |
246 |
|
<< " " << curr |
247 |
|
<< " " << candidate |
248 |
|
<< " " << e.getCoefficient() |
249 |
|
<< " " << sgn << endl; |
250 |
|
|
251 |
|
if(candidate) { |
252 |
|
candidates.push_back(Cand(curr, 0, sgn, &e.getCoefficient())); |
253 |
|
} |
254 |
|
} |
255 |
|
|
256 |
|
CompPenaltyColLength colCmp(&d_linEq); |
257 |
|
CandVector::iterator i = candidates.begin(); |
258 |
|
CandVector::iterator end = candidates.end(); |
259 |
|
std::make_heap(i, end, colCmp); |
260 |
|
|
261 |
|
// For the first 3 pivots take the best |
262 |
|
// After that, once an improvement is found on look at a |
263 |
|
// small number of pivots after finding an improvement |
264 |
|
// the longer the search to more willing we are to look at more candidates |
265 |
|
int maxCandidatesAfterImprove = |
266 |
|
(d_pivots <= 2) ? std::numeric_limits<int>::max() : d_pivots/5; |
267 |
|
|
268 |
|
int candidatesAfterFocusImprove = 0; |
269 |
|
while(i != end && candidatesAfterFocusImprove <= maxCandidatesAfterImprove){ |
270 |
|
std::pop_heap(i, end, colCmp); |
271 |
|
--end; |
272 |
|
Cand& cand = (*end); |
273 |
|
ArithVar curr = cand.d_nb; |
274 |
|
const Rational& coeff = *cand.d_coeff; |
275 |
|
|
276 |
|
LinearEqualityModule::UpdatePreferenceFunction leavingPrefFunc = selectLeavingFunction(curr); |
277 |
|
UpdateInfo currProposal = d_linEq.speculativeUpdate(curr, coeff, leavingPrefFunc); |
278 |
|
|
279 |
|
Debug("soi::selectPrimalUpdate") |
280 |
|
<< "selected " << selected << endl |
281 |
|
<< "currProp " << currProposal << endl |
282 |
|
<< "coeff " << coeff << endl; |
283 |
|
|
284 |
|
Assert(!currProposal.uninitialized()); |
285 |
|
|
286 |
|
if(candidatesAfterFocusImprove > 0){ |
287 |
|
candidatesAfterFocusImprove++; |
288 |
|
} |
289 |
|
|
290 |
|
if(selected.uninitialized() || (d_linEq.*upf)(selected, currProposal)){ |
291 |
|
selected = currProposal; |
292 |
|
WitnessImprovement w = selected.getWitness(false); |
293 |
|
Debug("soi::selectPrimalUpdate") << "selected " << w << endl; |
294 |
|
//setPenalty(curr, w); |
295 |
|
if(improvement(w)){ |
296 |
|
bool exitEarly; |
297 |
|
switch(w){ |
298 |
|
case ConflictFound: exitEarly = true; break; |
299 |
|
case FocusImproved: |
300 |
|
candidatesAfterFocusImprove = 1; |
301 |
|
exitEarly = false; |
302 |
|
break; |
303 |
|
default: |
304 |
|
exitEarly = false; break; |
305 |
|
} |
306 |
|
if(exitEarly){ break; } |
307 |
|
} |
308 |
|
}else{ |
309 |
|
Debug("soi::selectPrimalUpdate") << "dropped "<< endl; |
310 |
|
} |
311 |
|
|
312 |
|
} |
313 |
|
return selected; |
314 |
|
} |
315 |
|
|
316 |
|
bool debugCheckWitness(const UpdateInfo& inf, WitnessImprovement w, bool useBlands){ |
317 |
|
if(inf.getWitness(useBlands) == w){ |
318 |
|
switch(w){ |
319 |
|
case ConflictFound: return inf.foundConflict(); |
320 |
|
case ErrorDropped: return inf.errorsChange() < 0; |
321 |
|
case FocusImproved: return inf.focusDirection() > 0; |
322 |
|
case FocusShrank: return false; // This is not a valid output |
323 |
|
case Degenerate: return false; // This is not a valid output |
324 |
|
case BlandsDegenerate: return useBlands; |
325 |
|
case HeuristicDegenerate: return !useBlands; |
326 |
|
case AntiProductive: return false; |
327 |
|
} |
328 |
|
} |
329 |
|
return false; |
330 |
|
} |
331 |
|
|
332 |
|
|
333 |
|
void SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::debugPrintSignal(ArithVar updated) const{ |
334 |
|
Debug("updateAndSignal") << "updated basic " << updated; |
335 |
|
Debug("updateAndSignal") << " length " << d_tableau.basicRowLength(updated); |
336 |
|
Debug("updateAndSignal") << " consistent " << d_variables.assignmentIsConsistent(updated); |
337 |
|
int dir = !d_variables.assignmentIsConsistent(updated) ? |
338 |
|
d_errorSet.getSgn(updated) : 0; |
339 |
|
Debug("updateAndSignal") << " dir " << dir; |
340 |
|
Debug("updateAndSignal") << " debugBasicAtBoundCount " << d_linEq.debugBasicAtBoundCount(updated) << endl; |
341 |
|
} |
342 |
|
|
343 |
|
|
344 |
|
void SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::updateAndSignal(const UpdateInfo& selected, WitnessImprovement w){ |
345 |
|
ArithVar nonbasic = selected.nonbasic(); |
346 |
|
|
347 |
|
static bool verbose = false; |
348 |
|
|
349 |
|
Debug("updateAndSignal") << "updateAndSignal " << selected << endl; |
350 |
|
|
351 |
|
stringstream ss; |
352 |
|
if(verbose){ |
353 |
|
d_errorSet.debugPrint(ss); |
354 |
|
if(selected.describesPivot()){ |
355 |
|
ArithVar leaving = selected.leaving(); |
356 |
|
ss << "leaving " << leaving |
357 |
|
<< " " << d_tableau.basicRowLength(leaving) |
358 |
|
<< " " << d_linEq.debugBasicAtBoundCount(leaving) |
359 |
|
<< endl; |
360 |
|
} |
361 |
|
if(degenerate(w) && selected.describesPivot()){ |
362 |
|
ArithVar leaving = selected.leaving(); |
363 |
|
CVC5Message() << "degenerate " << leaving << ", atBounds " |
364 |
|
<< d_linEq.basicsAtBounds(selected) << ", len " |
365 |
|
<< d_tableau.basicRowLength(leaving) << ", bc " |
366 |
|
<< d_linEq.debugBasicAtBoundCount(leaving) << endl; |
367 |
|
} |
368 |
|
} |
369 |
|
|
370 |
|
if(selected.describesPivot()){ |
371 |
|
ConstraintP limiting = selected.limiting(); |
372 |
|
ArithVar basic = limiting->getVariable(); |
373 |
|
Assert(d_linEq.basicIsTracked(basic)); |
374 |
|
d_linEq.pivotAndUpdate(basic, nonbasic, limiting->getValue()); |
375 |
|
}else{ |
376 |
|
Assert(!selected.unbounded() || selected.errorsChange() < 0); |
377 |
|
|
378 |
|
DeltaRational newAssignment = |
379 |
|
d_variables.getAssignment(nonbasic) + selected.nonbasicDelta(); |
380 |
|
|
381 |
|
d_linEq.updateTracked(nonbasic, newAssignment); |
382 |
|
} |
383 |
|
d_pivots++; |
384 |
|
|
385 |
|
increaseLeavingCount(nonbasic); |
386 |
|
|
387 |
|
vector< pair<ArithVar, int> > focusChanges; |
388 |
|
while(d_errorSet.moreSignals()){ |
389 |
|
ArithVar updated = d_errorSet.topSignal(); |
390 |
|
int prevFocusSgn = d_errorSet.popSignal(); |
391 |
|
|
392 |
|
if(d_tableau.isBasic(updated)){ |
393 |
|
Assert(!d_variables.assignmentIsConsistent(updated) |
394 |
|
== d_errorSet.inError(updated)); |
395 |
|
if(Debug.isOn("updateAndSignal")){debugPrintSignal(updated);} |
396 |
|
if(!d_variables.assignmentIsConsistent(updated)){ |
397 |
|
if(checkBasicForConflict(updated)){ |
398 |
|
reportConflict(updated); |
399 |
|
//Assert(debugUpdatedBasic(selected, updated)); |
400 |
|
} |
401 |
|
} |
402 |
|
}else{ |
403 |
|
Debug("updateAndSignal") << "updated nonbasic " << updated << endl; |
404 |
|
} |
405 |
|
int currFocusSgn = d_errorSet.focusSgn(updated); |
406 |
|
if(currFocusSgn != prevFocusSgn){ |
407 |
|
int change = currFocusSgn - prevFocusSgn; |
408 |
|
focusChanges.push_back(make_pair(updated, change)); |
409 |
|
} |
410 |
|
} |
411 |
|
|
412 |
|
if (verbose) |
413 |
|
{ |
414 |
|
CVC5Message() << "conflict variable " << selected << endl; |
415 |
|
CVC5Message() << ss.str(); |
416 |
|
} |
417 |
|
if(Debug.isOn("error")){ d_errorSet.debugPrint(Debug("error")); } |
418 |
|
|
419 |
|
//Assert(debugSelectedErrorDropped(selected, d_errorSize, d_errorSet.errorSize())); |
420 |
|
|
421 |
|
adjustFocusAndError(selected, focusChanges); |
422 |
|
} |
423 |
|
|
424 |
|
void SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::qeAddRange(uint32_t begin, uint32_t end){ |
425 |
|
Assert(!d_qeInSoi.empty()); |
426 |
|
for(uint32_t i = begin; i != end; ++i){ |
427 |
|
ArithVar v = d_qeConflict[i]; |
428 |
|
addToInfeasFunc(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar, v); |
429 |
|
d_qeInSoi.add(v); |
430 |
|
} |
431 |
|
} |
432 |
|
|
433 |
|
void SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::qeRemoveRange(uint32_t begin, uint32_t end){ |
434 |
|
for(uint32_t i = begin; i != end; ++i){ |
435 |
|
ArithVar v = d_qeConflict[i]; |
436 |
|
removeFromInfeasFunc(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar, v); |
437 |
|
d_qeInSoi.remove(v); |
438 |
|
} |
439 |
|
Assert(!d_qeInSoi.empty()); |
440 |
|
} |
441 |
|
|
442 |
|
void SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::qeSwapRange(uint32_t N, uint32_t r, uint32_t s){ |
443 |
|
for(uint32_t i = 0; i < N; ++i){ |
444 |
|
std::swap(d_qeConflict[r+i], d_qeConflict[s+i]); |
445 |
|
} |
446 |
|
} |
447 |
|
|
448 |
|
/** |
449 |
|
* Region notation: |
450 |
|
* A region is either |
451 |
|
* - A single element X@i with the name X at the position i |
452 |
|
* - A sequence of indices X@[i,j) with the name X and the elements between i [inclusive] and j exclusive |
453 |
|
* - A concatenation of regions R1 and R2, R1;R2 |
454 |
|
* |
455 |
|
* Given the fixed assumptions C @ [0,cEnd) and a set of candidate minimizations U@[cEnd, uEnd) |
456 |
|
* s.t. C \cup U is known to be in conflict ([0,uEnd) has a conflict), find a minimal |
457 |
|
* subset of U, Delta, s.t. C \cup Delta is in conflict. |
458 |
|
* |
459 |
|
* Pre: |
460 |
|
* [0, uEnd) is a set and is in conflict. |
461 |
|
* uEnd <= assumptions.size() |
462 |
|
* [0, cEnd) is in d_inSoi. |
463 |
|
* |
464 |
|
* Invariants: [0,cEnd) is never modified |
465 |
|
* |
466 |
|
* Post: |
467 |
|
* [0, cEnd); [cEnd, deltaEnd) is in conflict |
468 |
|
* [0, deltaEnd) is a set |
469 |
|
* [0, deltaEnd) is in d_inSoi |
470 |
|
*/ |
471 |
|
uint32_t SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::quickExplainRec(uint32_t cEnd, uint32_t uEnd){ |
472 |
|
Assert(cEnd <= uEnd); |
473 |
|
Assert(d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.empty()); |
474 |
|
Assert(d_qeGreedyOrder.empty()); |
475 |
|
|
476 |
|
const Tableau::Entry* spoiler = NULL; |
477 |
|
|
478 |
|
if(d_soiVar != ARITHVAR_SENTINEL && d_linEq.selectSlackEntry(d_soiVar, false) == NULL){ |
479 |
|
// already in conflict |
480 |
|
return cEnd; |
481 |
|
} |
482 |
|
|
483 |
|
Assert(cEnd < uEnd); |
484 |
|
|
485 |
|
// Phase 1 : Construct the conflict greedily |
486 |
|
|
487 |
|
for(uint32_t i = cEnd; i < uEnd; ++i){ |
488 |
|
d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.add(d_qeConflict[i]); |
489 |
|
} |
490 |
|
if(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL){ // special case for d_soiVar being empty |
491 |
|
ArithVar first = d_qeConflict[cEnd]; |
492 |
|
d_soiVar = constructInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, first); |
493 |
|
d_qeInSoi.add(first); |
494 |
|
d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.remove(first); |
495 |
|
d_qeGreedyOrder.push_back(first); |
496 |
|
} |
497 |
|
while((spoiler = d_linEq.selectSlackEntry(d_soiVar, false)) != NULL){ |
498 |
|
Assert(!d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.empty()); |
499 |
|
|
500 |
|
ArithVar nb = spoiler->getColVar(); |
501 |
|
int oppositeSgn = -(spoiler->getCoefficient().sgn()); |
502 |
|
Assert(oppositeSgn != 0); |
503 |
|
|
504 |
|
ArithVar basicWithOp = find_basic_in_sgns(d_qeSgns, nb, oppositeSgn, d_qeInUAndNotInSoi, true); |
505 |
|
Assert(basicWithOp != ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
506 |
|
|
507 |
|
addToInfeasFunc(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar, basicWithOp); |
508 |
|
d_qeInSoi.add(basicWithOp); |
509 |
|
d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.remove(basicWithOp); |
510 |
|
d_qeGreedyOrder.push_back(basicWithOp); |
511 |
|
} |
512 |
|
Assert(spoiler == NULL); |
513 |
|
|
514 |
|
// Compact the set u |
515 |
|
uint32_t newEnd = cEnd + d_qeGreedyOrder.size(); |
516 |
|
std::copy(d_qeGreedyOrder.begin(), d_qeGreedyOrder.end(), d_qeConflict.begin()+cEnd); |
517 |
|
|
518 |
|
d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.purge(); |
519 |
|
d_qeGreedyOrder.clear(); |
520 |
|
|
521 |
|
// Phase 2 : Recursively determine the minimal set of rows |
522 |
|
|
523 |
|
uint32_t xPos = cEnd; |
524 |
|
std::swap(d_qeGreedyOrder[xPos], d_qeGreedyOrder[newEnd - 1]); |
525 |
|
uint32_t uBegin = xPos + 1; |
526 |
|
uint32_t split = (newEnd - uBegin)/2 + uBegin; |
527 |
|
|
528 |
|
//assumptions : C @ [0, cEnd); X @ xPos; U1 @ [u1Begin, split); U2 @ [split, newEnd) |
529 |
|
// [0, newEnd) == d_inSoi |
530 |
|
|
531 |
|
uint32_t compactU2; |
532 |
|
if(split == newEnd){ // U2 is empty |
533 |
|
compactU2 = newEnd; |
534 |
|
}else{ |
535 |
|
// Remove U2 from Soi |
536 |
|
qeRemoveRange(split, newEnd); |
537 |
|
// [0, split) == d_inSoi |
538 |
|
|
539 |
|
// pre assumptions: C + X + U1 @ [0,split); U2 [split, newEnd) |
540 |
|
compactU2 = quickExplainRec(split, newEnd); |
541 |
|
// post: |
542 |
|
// assumptions: C + X + U1 @ [0, split); delta2 @ [split - compactU2) |
543 |
|
// d_inSoi = [0, compactU2) |
544 |
|
} |
545 |
|
uint32_t deltaSize = compactU2 - split; |
546 |
|
qeSwapRange(deltaSize, uBegin, split); |
547 |
|
uint32_t d2End = uBegin+deltaSize; |
548 |
|
// assumptions : C @ [0, cEnd); X @ xPos; delta2 @ [uBegin, d2End); U1 @ [d2End, compactU2) |
549 |
|
// d_inSoi == [0, compactU2) |
550 |
|
|
551 |
|
uint32_t d1End; |
552 |
|
if(d2End == compactU2){ // U1 is empty |
553 |
|
d1End = d2End; |
554 |
|
}else{ |
555 |
|
qeRemoveRange(d2End, compactU2); |
556 |
|
|
557 |
|
//pre assumptions : C + X + delta2 @ [0, d2End); U1 @ [d2End, compactU2); |
558 |
|
d1End = quickExplainRec(d2End, compactU2); |
559 |
|
//post: |
560 |
|
// assumptions : C + X + delta2 @ [0, d2End); delta1 @ [d2End, d1End); |
561 |
|
// d_inSoi = [0, d1End) |
562 |
|
} |
563 |
|
//After both: |
564 |
|
// d_inSoi == [0, d1End), C @ [0, cEnd); X + delta2 + delta 1 @ [xPos, d1End); |
565 |
|
|
566 |
|
Assert(d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.empty()); |
567 |
|
Assert(d_qeGreedyOrder.empty()); |
568 |
|
return d1End; |
569 |
|
} |
570 |
|
|
571 |
|
void SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::quickExplain(){ |
572 |
|
Assert(d_qeInSoi.empty()); |
573 |
|
Assert(d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.empty()); |
574 |
|
Assert(d_qeGreedyOrder.empty()); |
575 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
576 |
|
Assert(d_qeSgns.empty()); |
577 |
|
|
578 |
|
d_qeConflict.clear(); |
579 |
|
d_errorSet.pushFocusInto(d_qeConflict); |
580 |
|
|
581 |
|
//cout << d_qeConflict.size() << " "; |
582 |
|
uint32_t size = d_qeConflict.size(); |
583 |
|
|
584 |
|
if(size > 2){ |
585 |
|
for(ErrorSet::focus_iterator iter = d_errorSet.focusBegin(), end = d_errorSet.focusEnd(); iter != end; ++iter){ |
586 |
|
ArithVar e = *iter; |
587 |
|
addRowSgns(d_qeSgns, e, d_errorSet.getSgn(e)); |
588 |
|
} |
589 |
|
uint32_t end = quickExplainRec(0u, size); |
590 |
|
Assert(end <= d_qeConflict.size()); |
591 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar != ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
592 |
|
Assert(!d_qeInSoi.empty()); |
593 |
|
|
594 |
|
d_qeConflict.resize(end); |
595 |
|
tearDownInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar); |
596 |
|
d_soiVar = ARITHVAR_SENTINEL; |
597 |
|
d_qeInSoi.purge(); |
598 |
|
d_qeSgns.clear(); |
599 |
|
} |
600 |
|
|
601 |
|
//cout << d_qeConflict.size() << endl; |
602 |
|
|
603 |
|
Assert(d_qeInSoi.empty()); |
604 |
|
Assert(d_qeInUAndNotInSoi.empty()); |
605 |
|
Assert(d_qeGreedyOrder.empty()); |
606 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
607 |
|
Assert(d_qeSgns.empty()); |
608 |
|
} |
609 |
|
|
610 |
|
unsigned SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::trySet(const ArithVarVec& set){ |
611 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
612 |
|
bool success = false; |
613 |
|
if(set.size() >= 2){ |
614 |
|
d_soiVar = constructInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, set); |
615 |
|
success = d_linEq.selectSlackEntry(d_soiVar, false) == NULL; |
616 |
|
|
617 |
|
tearDownInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar); |
618 |
|
d_soiVar = ARITHVAR_SENTINEL; |
619 |
|
} |
620 |
|
return success ? set.size() : std::numeric_limits<int>::max(); |
621 |
|
} |
622 |
|
|
623 |
|
std::vector< ArithVarVec > SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::greedyConflictSubsets(){ |
624 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "greedyConflictSubsets start" << endl; |
625 |
|
|
626 |
|
std::vector< ArithVarVec > subsets; |
627 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
628 |
|
|
629 |
|
if(d_errorSize <= 2){ |
630 |
|
ArithVarVec inError; |
631 |
|
d_errorSet.pushFocusInto(inError); |
632 |
|
|
633 |
|
Assert(debugIsASet(inError)); |
634 |
|
subsets.push_back(inError); |
635 |
|
return subsets; |
636 |
|
} |
637 |
|
Assert(d_errorSize > 2); |
638 |
|
|
639 |
|
//sgns_table< <nonbasic,sgn>, [basics] >; |
640 |
|
// Phase 0: Construct the sgns table |
641 |
|
sgn_table sgns; |
642 |
|
DenseSet hasParticipated; //Has participated in a conflict |
643 |
|
for(ErrorSet::focus_iterator iter = d_errorSet.focusBegin(), end = d_errorSet.focusEnd(); iter != end; ++iter){ |
644 |
|
ArithVar e = *iter; |
645 |
|
addRowSgns(sgns, e, d_errorSet.getSgn(e)); |
646 |
|
|
647 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "basic error var: " << e << endl; |
648 |
|
if(Debug.isOn("arith::greedyConflictSubsets")){ |
649 |
|
d_tableau.debugPrintIsBasic(e); |
650 |
|
d_tableau.printBasicRow(e, Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets")); |
651 |
|
} |
652 |
|
} |
653 |
|
|
654 |
|
// Phase 1: Try to find at least 1 pair for every element |
655 |
|
ArithVarVec tmp; |
656 |
|
tmp.push_back(0); |
657 |
|
tmp.push_back(0); |
658 |
|
for(ErrorSet::focus_iterator iter = d_errorSet.focusBegin(), end = d_errorSet.focusEnd(); iter != end; ++iter){ |
659 |
|
ArithVar e = *iter; |
660 |
|
tmp[0] = e; |
661 |
|
|
662 |
|
int errSgn = d_errorSet.getSgn(e); |
663 |
|
bool decreasing = errSgn < 0; |
664 |
|
const Tableau::Entry* spoiler = d_linEq.selectSlackEntry(e, decreasing); |
665 |
|
Assert(spoiler != NULL); |
666 |
|
ArithVar nb = spoiler->getColVar(); |
667 |
|
int oppositeSgn = -(errSgn * (spoiler->getCoefficient().sgn())); |
668 |
|
|
669 |
|
sgn_table::const_iterator opposites = find_sgns(sgns, nb, oppositeSgn); |
670 |
|
Assert(opposites != sgns.end()); |
671 |
|
|
672 |
|
const ArithVarVec& choices = (*opposites).second; |
673 |
|
for(ArithVarVec::const_iterator j = choices.begin(), jend = choices.end(); j != jend; ++j){ |
674 |
|
ArithVar b = *j; |
675 |
|
if(b < e){ continue; } |
676 |
|
tmp[0] = e; |
677 |
|
tmp[1] = b; |
678 |
|
if(trySet(tmp) == 2){ |
679 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "found a pair " << b << " " << e << endl; |
680 |
|
hasParticipated.softAdd(b); |
681 |
|
hasParticipated.softAdd(e); |
682 |
|
Assert(debugIsASet(tmp)); |
683 |
|
subsets.push_back(tmp); |
684 |
|
++(d_statistics.d_soiConflicts); |
685 |
|
++(d_statistics.d_hasToBeMinimal); |
686 |
|
} |
687 |
|
} |
688 |
|
} |
689 |
|
|
690 |
|
|
691 |
|
// Phase 2: If there is a variable that has not participated attempt to start a conflict |
692 |
|
ArithVarVec possibleStarts; //List of elements that can be tried for starts. |
693 |
|
d_errorSet.pushFocusInto(possibleStarts); |
694 |
|
while(!possibleStarts.empty()){ |
695 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
696 |
|
|
697 |
|
ArithVar v = possibleStarts.back(); |
698 |
|
possibleStarts.pop_back(); |
699 |
|
if(hasParticipated.isMember(v)){ continue; } |
700 |
|
|
701 |
|
hasParticipated.add(v); |
702 |
|
|
703 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
704 |
|
//d_soiVar's row = \sumofinfeasibilites underConstruction |
705 |
|
ArithVarVec underConstruction; |
706 |
|
underConstruction.push_back(v); |
707 |
|
d_soiVar = constructInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, v); |
708 |
|
|
709 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "trying " << v << endl; |
710 |
|
|
711 |
|
const Tableau::Entry* spoiler = NULL; |
712 |
|
while( (spoiler = d_linEq.selectSlackEntry(d_soiVar, false)) != NULL){ |
713 |
|
ArithVar nb = spoiler->getColVar(); |
714 |
|
int oppositeSgn = -(spoiler->getCoefficient().sgn()); |
715 |
|
Assert(oppositeSgn != 0); |
716 |
|
|
717 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "looking for " << nb << " " << oppositeSgn << endl; |
718 |
|
|
719 |
|
ArithVar basicWithOp = find_basic_in_sgns(sgns, nb, oppositeSgn, hasParticipated, false); |
720 |
|
|
721 |
|
if(basicWithOp == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL){ |
722 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "search did not work for " << nb << endl; |
723 |
|
// greedy construction has failed |
724 |
|
break; |
725 |
|
}else{ |
726 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "found " << basicWithOp << endl; |
727 |
|
|
728 |
|
addToInfeasFunc(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar, basicWithOp); |
729 |
|
hasParticipated.softAdd(basicWithOp); |
730 |
|
underConstruction.push_back(basicWithOp); |
731 |
|
} |
732 |
|
} |
733 |
|
if(spoiler == NULL){ |
734 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "success" << endl; |
735 |
|
//then underConstruction contains a conflicting subset |
736 |
|
Assert(debugIsASet(underConstruction)); |
737 |
|
subsets.push_back(underConstruction); |
738 |
|
++d_statistics.d_soiConflicts; |
739 |
|
if(underConstruction.size() == 3){ |
740 |
|
++d_statistics.d_hasToBeMinimal; |
741 |
|
}else{ |
742 |
|
++d_statistics.d_maybeNotMinimal; |
743 |
|
} |
744 |
|
}else{ |
745 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "failure" << endl; |
746 |
|
} |
747 |
|
tearDownInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar); |
748 |
|
d_soiVar = ARITHVAR_SENTINEL; |
749 |
|
// if(false && spoiler == NULL){ |
750 |
|
// ArithVarVec tmp; |
751 |
|
// int smallest = tryAllSubsets(underConstruction, 0, tmp); |
752 |
|
// cout << underConstruction.size() << " " << smallest << endl; |
753 |
|
// Assert(smallest >= underConstruction.size()); |
754 |
|
// if(smallest < underConstruction.size()){ |
755 |
|
// exit(-1); |
756 |
|
// } |
757 |
|
// } |
758 |
|
} |
759 |
|
|
760 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
761 |
|
Debug("arith::greedyConflictSubsets") << "greedyConflictSubsets done" << endl; |
762 |
|
return subsets; |
763 |
|
} |
764 |
|
|
765 |
|
bool SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::generateSOIConflict(const ArithVarVec& subset){ |
766 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
767 |
|
d_soiVar = constructInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, subset); |
768 |
|
Assert(!subset.empty()); |
769 |
|
Assert(!d_conflictBuilder->underConstruction()); |
770 |
|
|
771 |
|
Debug("arith::generateSOIConflict") << "SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::generateSOIConflict(...) start" << endl; |
772 |
|
|
773 |
|
bool success = false; |
774 |
|
|
775 |
|
for(ArithVarVec::const_iterator iter = subset.begin(), end = subset.end(); iter != end; ++iter){ |
776 |
|
ArithVar e = *iter; |
777 |
|
ConstraintP violated = d_errorSet.getViolated(e); |
778 |
|
Assert(violated != NullConstraint); |
779 |
|
|
780 |
|
int sgn = d_errorSet.getSgn(e); |
781 |
|
const Rational& violatedCoeff = sgn > 0 ? d_negOne : d_posOne; |
782 |
|
Debug("arith::generateSOIConflict") << "basic error var: " |
783 |
|
<< "(" << violatedCoeff << ")" |
784 |
|
<< " " << violated |
785 |
|
<< endl; |
786 |
|
|
787 |
|
|
788 |
|
d_conflictBuilder->addConstraint(violated, violatedCoeff); |
789 |
|
Assert(violated->hasProof()); |
790 |
|
if(!success && !violated->negationHasProof()){ |
791 |
|
success = true; |
792 |
|
d_conflictBuilder->makeLastConsequent(); |
793 |
|
} |
794 |
|
} |
795 |
|
|
796 |
|
if(!success){ |
797 |
|
// failure |
798 |
|
d_conflictBuilder->reset(); |
799 |
|
} else { |
800 |
|
// pick a violated constraint arbitrarily. any of them may be selected for the conflict |
801 |
|
Assert(d_conflictBuilder->underConstruction()); |
802 |
|
Assert(d_conflictBuilder->consequentIsSet()); |
803 |
|
|
804 |
|
for(Tableau::RowIterator i = d_tableau.basicRowIterator(d_soiVar); !i.atEnd(); ++i){ |
805 |
|
const Tableau::Entry& entry = *i; |
806 |
|
ArithVar v = entry.getColVar(); |
807 |
|
if(v == d_soiVar){ continue; } |
808 |
|
const Rational& coeff = entry.getCoefficient(); |
809 |
|
|
810 |
|
ConstraintP c = (coeff.sgn() > 0) ? |
811 |
|
d_variables.getUpperBoundConstraint(v) : |
812 |
|
d_variables.getLowerBoundConstraint(v); |
813 |
|
|
814 |
|
Debug("arith::generateSOIConflict") << "non-basic var: " |
815 |
|
<< "(" << coeff << ")" |
816 |
|
<< " " << c |
817 |
|
<< endl; |
818 |
|
d_conflictBuilder->addConstraint(c, coeff); |
819 |
|
} |
820 |
|
ConstraintCP conflicted = d_conflictBuilder->commitConflict(); |
821 |
|
d_conflictChannel.raiseConflict(conflicted, |
822 |
|
InferenceId::ARITH_CONF_SOI_SIMPLEX); |
823 |
|
} |
824 |
|
|
825 |
|
tearDownInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar); |
826 |
|
d_soiVar = ARITHVAR_SENTINEL; |
827 |
|
Debug("arith::generateSOIConflict") << "SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::generateSOIConflict(...) done" << endl; |
828 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
829 |
|
Assert(!d_conflictBuilder->underConstruction()); |
830 |
|
return success; |
831 |
|
} |
832 |
|
|
833 |
|
|
834 |
|
WitnessImprovement SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::SOIConflict(){ |
835 |
|
static int instance = 0; |
836 |
|
instance++; |
837 |
|
|
838 |
|
Debug("arith::SOIConflict") << "SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::SOIConflict() start " |
839 |
|
<< instance << ": |E| = " << d_errorSize << endl; |
840 |
|
if(Debug.isOn("arith::SOIConflict")){ |
841 |
|
d_errorSet.debugPrint(cout); |
842 |
|
} |
843 |
|
Debug("arith::SOIConflict") << endl; |
844 |
|
|
845 |
|
tearDownInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization, d_soiVar); |
846 |
|
d_soiVar = ARITHVAR_SENTINEL; |
847 |
|
|
848 |
|
if(options::soiQuickExplain()){ |
849 |
|
quickExplain(); |
850 |
|
generateSOIConflict(d_qeConflict); |
851 |
|
}else{ |
852 |
|
vector<ArithVarVec> subsets = greedyConflictSubsets(); |
853 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
854 |
|
bool anySuccess = false; |
855 |
|
Assert(!subsets.empty()); |
856 |
|
for(vector<ArithVarVec>::const_iterator i = subsets.begin(), end = subsets.end(); i != end; ++i){ |
857 |
|
const ArithVarVec& subset = *i; |
858 |
|
Assert(debugIsASet(subset)); |
859 |
|
anySuccess = generateSOIConflict(subset) || anySuccess; |
860 |
|
//Node conflict = generateSOIConflict(subset); |
861 |
|
//cout << conflict << endl; |
862 |
|
|
863 |
|
//reportConflict(conf); do not do this. We need a custom explanations! |
864 |
|
//d_conflictChannel(conflict); |
865 |
|
} |
866 |
|
Assert(anySuccess); |
867 |
|
} |
868 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
869 |
|
d_soiVar = constructInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiConflictMinimization); |
870 |
|
|
871 |
|
//reportConflict(conf); do not do this. We need a custom explanations! |
872 |
|
d_conflictVariables.add(d_soiVar); |
873 |
|
|
874 |
|
Debug("arith::SOIConflict") << "SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::SOIConflict() done " |
875 |
|
<< instance << "end" << endl; |
876 |
|
return ConflictFound; |
877 |
|
} |
878 |
|
|
879 |
|
WitnessImprovement SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::soiRound() { |
880 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar != ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
881 |
|
|
882 |
|
bool useBlands = degeneratePivotsInARow() >= s_maxDegeneratePivotsBeforeBlandsOnLeaving; |
883 |
|
LinearEqualityModule::UpdatePreferenceFunction upf; |
884 |
|
if(useBlands) { |
885 |
|
upf = &LinearEqualityModule::preferWitness<false>; |
886 |
|
} else { |
887 |
|
upf = &LinearEqualityModule::preferWitness<true>; |
888 |
|
} |
889 |
|
|
890 |
|
LinearEqualityModule::VarPreferenceFunction bpf = useBlands ? |
891 |
|
&LinearEqualityModule::minVarOrder : |
892 |
|
&LinearEqualityModule::minRowLength; |
893 |
|
bpf = &LinearEqualityModule::minVarOrder; |
894 |
|
|
895 |
|
UpdateInfo selected = selectUpdate(upf, bpf); |
896 |
|
|
897 |
|
if(selected.uninitialized()){ |
898 |
|
Debug("selectFocusImproving") << "SOI is optimum, but we don't have sat/conflict yet" << endl; |
899 |
|
return SOIConflict(); |
900 |
|
}else{ |
901 |
|
Assert(!selected.uninitialized()); |
902 |
|
WitnessImprovement w = selected.getWitness(false); |
903 |
|
Assert(debugCheckWitness(selected, w, false)); |
904 |
|
|
905 |
|
updateAndSignal(selected, w); |
906 |
|
logPivot(w); |
907 |
|
return w; |
908 |
|
} |
909 |
|
} |
910 |
|
|
911 |
|
bool SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::debugSOI(WitnessImprovement w, ostream& out, int instance) const{ |
912 |
|
return true; |
913 |
|
// out << "DLV("<<instance<<") "; |
914 |
|
// switch(w){ |
915 |
|
// case ConflictFound: |
916 |
|
// out << "found conflict" << endl; |
917 |
|
// return !d_conflictVariables.empty(); |
918 |
|
// case ErrorDropped: |
919 |
|
// return false; |
920 |
|
// // out << "dropped " << prevErrorSize - d_errorSize << endl; |
921 |
|
// // return d_errorSize < prevErrorSize; |
922 |
|
// case FocusImproved: |
923 |
|
// out << "focus improved"<< endl; |
924 |
|
// return d_errorSize == prevErrorSize; |
925 |
|
// case FocusShrank: |
926 |
|
// Unreachable(); |
927 |
|
// return false; |
928 |
|
// case BlandsDegenerate: |
929 |
|
// out << "bland degenerate"<< endl; |
930 |
|
// return true; |
931 |
|
// case HeuristicDegenerate: |
932 |
|
// out << "heuristic degenerate"<< endl; |
933 |
|
// return true; |
934 |
|
// case AntiProductive: |
935 |
|
// case Degenerate: |
936 |
|
// return false; |
937 |
|
// } |
938 |
|
// return false; |
939 |
|
} |
940 |
|
|
941 |
|
Result::Sat SumOfInfeasibilitiesSPD::sumOfInfeasibilities(){ |
942 |
|
static int instance = 0; |
943 |
|
static bool verbose = false; |
944 |
|
|
945 |
|
TimerStat::CodeTimer codeTimer(d_statistics.d_soiTimer); |
946 |
|
|
947 |
|
Assert(d_sgnDisagreements.empty()); |
948 |
|
Assert(d_pivotBudget != 0); |
949 |
|
Assert(d_errorSize == d_errorSet.errorSize()); |
950 |
|
Assert(d_errorSize > 0); |
951 |
|
Assert(d_conflictVariables.empty()); |
952 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
953 |
|
|
954 |
|
//d_scores.purge(); |
955 |
|
d_soiVar = constructInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiFocusConstructionTimer); |
956 |
|
|
957 |
|
|
958 |
|
while(d_pivotBudget != 0 && d_errorSize > 0 && d_conflictVariables.empty()){ |
959 |
|
++instance; |
960 |
|
Debug("dualLike") << "dualLike " << instance << endl; |
961 |
|
|
962 |
|
Assert(d_errorSet.noSignals()); |
963 |
|
// Possible outcomes: |
964 |
|
// - conflict |
965 |
|
// - budget was exhausted |
966 |
|
// - focus went down |
967 |
|
Debug("dualLike") << "selectFocusImproving " << endl; |
968 |
|
WitnessImprovement w = soiRound(); |
969 |
|
|
970 |
|
Assert(d_errorSize == d_errorSet.errorSize()); |
971 |
|
|
972 |
|
if (verbose) |
973 |
|
{ |
974 |
|
debugSOI(w, CVC5Message(), instance); |
975 |
|
} |
976 |
|
Assert(debugSOI(w, Debug("dualLike"), instance)); |
977 |
|
} |
978 |
|
|
979 |
|
|
980 |
|
if(d_soiVar != ARITHVAR_SENTINEL){ |
981 |
|
tearDownInfeasiblityFunction(d_statistics.d_soiFocusConstructionTimer, d_soiVar); |
982 |
|
d_soiVar = ARITHVAR_SENTINEL; |
983 |
|
} |
984 |
|
|
985 |
|
Assert(d_soiVar == ARITHVAR_SENTINEL); |
986 |
|
if(!d_conflictVariables.empty()){ |
987 |
|
return Result::UNSAT; |
988 |
|
}else if(d_errorSet.errorEmpty()){ |
989 |
|
Assert(d_errorSet.noSignals()); |
990 |
|
return Result::SAT; |
991 |
|
}else{ |
992 |
|
Assert(d_pivotBudget == 0); |
993 |
|
return Result::SAT_UNKNOWN; |
994 |
|
} |
995 |
|
} |
996 |
|
|
997 |
|
} // namespace arith |
998 |
|
} // namespace theory |
999 |
29286 |
} // namespace cvc5 |