1 |
|
/****************************************************************************** |
2 |
|
* Top contributors (to current version): |
3 |
|
* Andrew Reynolds, Haniel Barbosa, Aina Niemetz |
4 |
|
* |
5 |
|
* This file is part of the cvc5 project. |
6 |
|
* |
7 |
|
* Copyright (c) 2009-2021 by the authors listed in the file AUTHORS |
8 |
|
* in the top-level source directory and their institutional affiliations. |
9 |
|
* All rights reserved. See the file COPYING in the top-level source |
10 |
|
* directory for licensing information. |
11 |
|
* **************************************************************************** |
12 |
|
* |
13 |
|
* Implementation of proof node manager. |
14 |
|
*/ |
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
#include "proof/proof_node_manager.h" |
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
#include <sstream> |
19 |
|
|
20 |
|
#include "options/proof_options.h" |
21 |
|
#include "proof/proof.h" |
22 |
|
#include "proof/proof_checker.h" |
23 |
|
#include "proof/proof_node.h" |
24 |
|
#include "proof/proof_node_algorithm.h" |
25 |
|
#include "theory/rewriter.h" |
26 |
|
|
27 |
|
using namespace cvc5::kind; |
28 |
|
|
29 |
|
namespace cvc5 { |
30 |
|
|
31 |
3766 |
ProofNodeManager::ProofNodeManager(ProofChecker* pc) : d_checker(pc) |
32 |
|
{ |
33 |
3766 |
d_true = NodeManager::currentNM()->mkConst(true); |
34 |
3766 |
} |
35 |
|
|
36 |
18770219 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::mkNode( |
37 |
|
PfRule id, |
38 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, |
39 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args, |
40 |
|
Node expected) |
41 |
|
{ |
42 |
37540438 |
Trace("pnm") << "ProofNodeManager::mkNode " << id << " {" << expected.getId() |
43 |
18770219 |
<< "} " << expected << "\n"; |
44 |
37540438 |
Node res = checkInternal(id, children, args, expected); |
45 |
18770219 |
if (res.isNull()) |
46 |
|
{ |
47 |
|
// if it was invalid, then we return the null node |
48 |
|
return nullptr; |
49 |
|
} |
50 |
|
// otherwise construct the proof node and set its proven field |
51 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pn = |
52 |
37540438 |
std::make_shared<ProofNode>(id, children, args); |
53 |
18770219 |
pn->d_proven = res; |
54 |
18770219 |
return pn; |
55 |
|
} |
56 |
|
|
57 |
9785961 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::mkAssume(Node fact) |
58 |
|
{ |
59 |
9785961 |
Assert(!fact.isNull()); |
60 |
9785961 |
Assert(fact.getType().isBoolean()); |
61 |
9785961 |
return mkNode(PfRule::ASSUME, {}, {fact}, fact); |
62 |
|
} |
63 |
|
|
64 |
365 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::mkTrans( |
65 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, Node expected) |
66 |
|
{ |
67 |
365 |
Assert(!children.empty()); |
68 |
365 |
if (children.size() == 1) |
69 |
|
{ |
70 |
|
Assert(expected.isNull() || children[0]->getResult() == expected); |
71 |
|
return children[0]; |
72 |
|
} |
73 |
365 |
return mkNode(PfRule::TRANS, children, {}, expected); |
74 |
|
} |
75 |
|
|
76 |
170983 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::mkScope( |
77 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pf, |
78 |
|
std::vector<Node>& assumps, |
79 |
|
bool ensureClosed, |
80 |
|
bool doMinimize, |
81 |
|
Node expected) |
82 |
|
{ |
83 |
170983 |
if (!ensureClosed) |
84 |
|
{ |
85 |
51555 |
return mkNode(PfRule::SCOPE, {pf}, assumps, expected); |
86 |
|
} |
87 |
119428 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << "ProofNodeManager::mkScope " << assumps << std::endl; |
88 |
|
// we first ensure the assumptions are flattened |
89 |
238856 |
std::unordered_set<Node> ac{assumps.begin(), assumps.end()}; |
90 |
|
// map from the rewritten form of assumptions to the original. This is only |
91 |
|
// computed in the rare case when we need rewriting to match the |
92 |
|
// assumptions. An example of this is for Boolean constant equalities in |
93 |
|
// scoped proofs from the proof equality engine. |
94 |
238856 |
std::unordered_map<Node, Node> acr; |
95 |
|
// whether we have compute the map above |
96 |
119428 |
bool computedAcr = false; |
97 |
|
|
98 |
|
// The free assumptions of the proof |
99 |
238856 |
std::map<Node, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>> famap; |
100 |
119428 |
expr::getFreeAssumptionsMap(pf, famap); |
101 |
238856 |
std::unordered_set<Node> acu; |
102 |
525647 |
for (const std::pair<const Node, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>>& |
103 |
119428 |
fa : famap) |
104 |
|
{ |
105 |
1051294 |
Node a = fa.first; |
106 |
925269 |
if (ac.find(a) != ac.end()) |
107 |
|
{ |
108 |
|
// already covered by an assumption |
109 |
399622 |
acu.insert(a); |
110 |
399622 |
continue; |
111 |
|
} |
112 |
|
// trivial assumption |
113 |
126025 |
if (a == d_true) |
114 |
|
{ |
115 |
|
Trace("pnm-scope") << "- justify trivial True assumption\n"; |
116 |
|
for (std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pfs : fa.second) |
117 |
|
{ |
118 |
|
Assert(pfs->getResult() == a); |
119 |
|
updateNode(pfs.get(), PfRule::MACRO_SR_PRED_INTRO, {}, {a}); |
120 |
|
} |
121 |
|
Trace("pnm-scope") << "...finished" << std::endl; |
122 |
|
acu.insert(a); |
123 |
|
continue; |
124 |
|
} |
125 |
126025 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << "- try matching free assumption " << a << "\n"; |
126 |
|
// otherwise it may be due to symmetry? |
127 |
252050 |
Node aeqSym = CDProof::getSymmFact(a); |
128 |
126025 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << " - try sym " << aeqSym << "\n"; |
129 |
252050 |
Node aMatch; |
130 |
126025 |
if (!aeqSym.isNull() && ac.count(aeqSym)) |
131 |
|
{ |
132 |
250816 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << "- reorient assumption " << aeqSym << " via " << a |
133 |
250816 |
<< " for " << fa.second.size() << " proof nodes" |
134 |
125408 |
<< std::endl; |
135 |
125408 |
aMatch = aeqSym; |
136 |
|
} |
137 |
|
else |
138 |
|
{ |
139 |
|
// Otherwise, may be derivable by rewriting. Note this is used in |
140 |
|
// ensuring that proofs from the proof equality engine that involve |
141 |
|
// equality with Boolean constants are closed. |
142 |
617 |
if (!computedAcr) |
143 |
|
{ |
144 |
243 |
computedAcr = true; |
145 |
3508 |
for (const Node& acc : ac) |
146 |
|
{ |
147 |
6530 |
Node accr = theory::Rewriter::rewrite(acc); |
148 |
3265 |
if (accr != acc) |
149 |
|
{ |
150 |
1262 |
acr[accr] = acc; |
151 |
|
} |
152 |
|
} |
153 |
|
} |
154 |
1234 |
Node ar = theory::Rewriter::rewrite(a); |
155 |
617 |
std::unordered_map<Node, Node>::iterator itr = acr.find(ar); |
156 |
617 |
if (itr != acr.end()) |
157 |
|
{ |
158 |
617 |
aMatch = itr->second; |
159 |
|
} |
160 |
|
} |
161 |
|
|
162 |
|
// if we found a match either by symmetry or rewriting, then we connect |
163 |
|
// the assumption here. |
164 |
126025 |
if (!aMatch.isNull()) |
165 |
|
{ |
166 |
252050 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pfaa = mkAssume(aMatch); |
167 |
|
// must correct the orientation on this leaf |
168 |
252050 |
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>> children; |
169 |
126025 |
children.push_back(pfaa); |
170 |
252050 |
for (std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pfs : fa.second) |
171 |
|
{ |
172 |
126025 |
Assert(pfs->getResult() == a); |
173 |
|
// use SYMM if possible |
174 |
126025 |
if (aMatch == aeqSym) |
175 |
|
{ |
176 |
125408 |
updateNode(pfs.get(), PfRule::SYMM, children, {}); |
177 |
|
} |
178 |
|
else |
179 |
|
{ |
180 |
617 |
updateNode(pfs.get(), PfRule::MACRO_SR_PRED_TRANSFORM, children, {a}); |
181 |
|
} |
182 |
|
} |
183 |
126025 |
Trace("pnm-scope") << "...finished" << std::endl; |
184 |
126025 |
acu.insert(aMatch); |
185 |
126025 |
continue; |
186 |
|
} |
187 |
|
// If we did not find a match, it is an error, since all free assumptions |
188 |
|
// should be arguments to SCOPE. |
189 |
|
std::stringstream ss; |
190 |
|
|
191 |
|
bool dumpProofTraceOn = Trace.isOn("dump-proof-error"); |
192 |
|
if (dumpProofTraceOn) |
193 |
|
{ |
194 |
|
ss << "The proof : " << *pf << std::endl; |
195 |
|
} |
196 |
|
ss << std::endl << "Free assumption: " << a << std::endl; |
197 |
|
for (const Node& aprint : ac) |
198 |
|
{ |
199 |
|
ss << "- assumption: " << aprint << std::endl; |
200 |
|
} |
201 |
|
if (!dumpProofTraceOn) |
202 |
|
{ |
203 |
|
ss << "Use -t dump-proof-error for details on proof" << std::endl; |
204 |
|
} |
205 |
|
Unreachable() << "Generated a proof that is not closed by the scope: " |
206 |
|
<< ss.str() << std::endl; |
207 |
|
} |
208 |
119428 |
if (acu.size() < ac.size()) |
209 |
|
{ |
210 |
|
// All assumptions should match a free assumption; if one does not, then |
211 |
|
// the explanation could have been smaller. |
212 |
45095 |
for (const Node& a : ac) |
213 |
|
{ |
214 |
40892 |
if (acu.find(a) == acu.end()) |
215 |
|
{ |
216 |
26380 |
Notice() << "ProofNodeManager::mkScope: assumption " << a |
217 |
|
<< " does not match a free assumption in proof" << std::endl; |
218 |
|
} |
219 |
|
} |
220 |
|
} |
221 |
119428 |
if (doMinimize && acu.size() < ac.size()) |
222 |
|
{ |
223 |
3181 |
assumps.clear(); |
224 |
3181 |
assumps.insert(assumps.end(), acu.begin(), acu.end()); |
225 |
|
} |
226 |
116247 |
else if (ac.size() < assumps.size()) |
227 |
|
{ |
228 |
|
// remove duplicates to avoid redundant literals in clauses |
229 |
156 |
assumps.clear(); |
230 |
156 |
assumps.insert(assumps.end(), ac.begin(), ac.end()); |
231 |
|
} |
232 |
238856 |
Node minExpected; |
233 |
119428 |
NodeManager* nm = NodeManager::currentNM(); |
234 |
238856 |
Node exp; |
235 |
119428 |
if (assumps.empty()) |
236 |
|
{ |
237 |
|
// SCOPE with no arguments is a no-op, just return original |
238 |
2239 |
return pf; |
239 |
|
} |
240 |
234378 |
Node conc = pf->getResult(); |
241 |
117189 |
exp = assumps.size() == 1 ? assumps[0] : nm->mkNode(AND, assumps); |
242 |
117189 |
if (conc.isConst() && !conc.getConst<bool>()) |
243 |
|
{ |
244 |
40944 |
minExpected = exp.notNode(); |
245 |
|
} |
246 |
|
else |
247 |
|
{ |
248 |
76245 |
minExpected = nm->mkNode(IMPLIES, exp, conc); |
249 |
|
} |
250 |
117189 |
return mkNode(PfRule::SCOPE, {pf}, assumps, minExpected); |
251 |
|
} |
252 |
|
|
253 |
181236 |
bool ProofNodeManager::updateNode( |
254 |
|
ProofNode* pn, |
255 |
|
PfRule id, |
256 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, |
257 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args) |
258 |
|
{ |
259 |
181236 |
return updateNodeInternal(pn, id, children, args, true); |
260 |
|
} |
261 |
|
|
262 |
2192509 |
bool ProofNodeManager::updateNode(ProofNode* pn, ProofNode* pnr) |
263 |
|
{ |
264 |
2192509 |
Assert(pn != nullptr); |
265 |
2192509 |
Assert(pnr != nullptr); |
266 |
2192509 |
if (pn->getResult() != pnr->getResult()) |
267 |
|
{ |
268 |
|
return false; |
269 |
|
} |
270 |
|
// can shortcut re-check of rule |
271 |
2192509 |
return updateNodeInternal( |
272 |
2192509 |
pn, pnr->getRule(), pnr->getChildren(), pnr->getArguments(), false); |
273 |
|
} |
274 |
|
|
275 |
18951455 |
Node ProofNodeManager::checkInternal( |
276 |
|
PfRule id, |
277 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, |
278 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args, |
279 |
|
Node expected) |
280 |
|
{ |
281 |
18951455 |
Node res; |
282 |
18951455 |
if (d_checker) |
283 |
|
{ |
284 |
|
// check with the checker, which takes expected as argument |
285 |
18951455 |
res = d_checker->check(id, children, args, expected); |
286 |
18951455 |
Assert(!res.isNull()) |
287 |
|
<< "ProofNodeManager::checkInternal: failed to check proof"; |
288 |
|
} |
289 |
|
else |
290 |
|
{ |
291 |
|
// otherwise we trust the expected value, if it exists |
292 |
|
Assert(!expected.isNull()) << "ProofNodeManager::checkInternal: no checker " |
293 |
|
"or expected value provided"; |
294 |
|
res = expected; |
295 |
|
} |
296 |
18951455 |
return res; |
297 |
|
} |
298 |
|
|
299 |
11339012 |
ProofChecker* ProofNodeManager::getChecker() const { return d_checker; } |
300 |
|
|
301 |
56848 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> ProofNodeManager::clone( |
302 |
|
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> pn) |
303 |
|
{ |
304 |
56848 |
const ProofNode* orig = pn.get(); |
305 |
113696 |
std::unordered_map<const ProofNode*, std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>> visited; |
306 |
56848 |
std::unordered_map<const ProofNode*, std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>::iterator it; |
307 |
113696 |
std::vector<const ProofNode*> visit; |
308 |
113696 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> cloned; |
309 |
56848 |
visit.push_back(orig); |
310 |
|
const ProofNode* cur; |
311 |
4300594 |
while (!visit.empty()) |
312 |
|
{ |
313 |
2121873 |
cur = visit.back(); |
314 |
2121873 |
it = visited.find(cur); |
315 |
2121873 |
if (it == visited.end()) |
316 |
|
{ |
317 |
965695 |
visited[cur] = nullptr; |
318 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children = |
319 |
965695 |
cur->getChildren(); |
320 |
2065025 |
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cp : children) |
321 |
|
{ |
322 |
1099330 |
visit.push_back(cp.get()); |
323 |
|
} |
324 |
965695 |
continue; |
325 |
|
} |
326 |
1156178 |
visit.pop_back(); |
327 |
1156178 |
if (it->second.get() == nullptr) |
328 |
|
{ |
329 |
1931390 |
std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>> cchildren; |
330 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children = |
331 |
965695 |
cur->getChildren(); |
332 |
2065025 |
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cp : children) |
333 |
|
{ |
334 |
1099330 |
it = visited.find(cp.get()); |
335 |
1099330 |
Assert(it != visited.end()); |
336 |
1099330 |
Assert(it->second != nullptr); |
337 |
1099330 |
cchildren.push_back(it->second); |
338 |
|
} |
339 |
1931390 |
cloned = std::make_shared<ProofNode>( |
340 |
1931390 |
cur->getRule(), cchildren, cur->getArguments()); |
341 |
965695 |
visited[cur] = cloned; |
342 |
|
// we trust the above cloning does not change what is proven |
343 |
965695 |
cloned->d_proven = cur->d_proven; |
344 |
|
} |
345 |
|
} |
346 |
56848 |
Assert(visited.find(orig) != visited.end()); |
347 |
113696 |
return visited[orig]; |
348 |
|
} |
349 |
|
|
350 |
2373745 |
bool ProofNodeManager::updateNodeInternal( |
351 |
|
ProofNode* pn, |
352 |
|
PfRule id, |
353 |
|
const std::vector<std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>>& children, |
354 |
|
const std::vector<Node>& args, |
355 |
|
bool needsCheck) |
356 |
|
{ |
357 |
2373745 |
Assert(pn != nullptr); |
358 |
|
// ---------------- check for cyclic |
359 |
2373745 |
if (options::proofEagerChecking()) |
360 |
|
{ |
361 |
|
std::unordered_set<const ProofNode*> visited; |
362 |
|
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cpc : children) |
363 |
|
{ |
364 |
|
if (expr::containsSubproof(cpc.get(), pn, visited)) |
365 |
|
{ |
366 |
|
std::stringstream ss; |
367 |
|
ss << "ProofNodeManager::updateNode: attempting to make cyclic proof! " |
368 |
|
<< id << " " << pn->getResult() << ", children = " << std::endl; |
369 |
|
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cp : children) |
370 |
|
{ |
371 |
|
ss << " " << cp->getRule() << " " << cp->getResult() << std::endl; |
372 |
|
} |
373 |
|
ss << "Full children:" << std::endl; |
374 |
|
for (const std::shared_ptr<ProofNode>& cp : children) |
375 |
|
{ |
376 |
|
ss << " - "; |
377 |
|
cp->printDebug(ss); |
378 |
|
ss << std::endl; |
379 |
|
} |
380 |
|
Unreachable() << ss.str(); |
381 |
|
} |
382 |
|
} |
383 |
|
} |
384 |
|
// ---------------- end check for cyclic |
385 |
|
|
386 |
|
// should have already computed what is proven |
387 |
2373745 |
Assert(!pn->d_proven.isNull()) |
388 |
|
<< "ProofNodeManager::updateProofNode: invalid proof provided"; |
389 |
2373745 |
if (needsCheck) |
390 |
|
{ |
391 |
|
// We expect to prove the same thing as before |
392 |
362472 |
Node res = checkInternal(id, children, args, pn->d_proven); |
393 |
181236 |
if (res.isNull()) |
394 |
|
{ |
395 |
|
// if it was invalid, then we do not update |
396 |
|
return false; |
397 |
|
} |
398 |
|
// proven field should already be the same as the result |
399 |
181236 |
Assert(res == pn->d_proven); |
400 |
|
} |
401 |
|
|
402 |
|
// we update its value |
403 |
2373745 |
pn->setValue(id, children, args); |
404 |
2373745 |
return true; |
405 |
|
} |
406 |
|
|
407 |
29337 |
} // namespace cvc5 |