1 |
|
/***************************************************************************************[Solver.cc] |
2 |
|
Copyright (c) 2003-2006, Niklas Een, Niklas Sorensson |
3 |
|
Copyright (c) 2007-2010, Niklas Sorensson |
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and |
6 |
|
associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, |
7 |
|
including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, |
8 |
|
sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is |
9 |
|
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: |
10 |
|
|
11 |
|
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or |
12 |
|
substantial portions of the Software. |
13 |
|
|
14 |
|
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT |
15 |
|
NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND |
16 |
|
NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, |
17 |
|
DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT |
18 |
|
OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. |
19 |
|
**************************************************************************************************/ |
20 |
|
|
21 |
|
#include "prop/minisat/core/Solver.h" |
22 |
|
|
23 |
|
#include <math.h> |
24 |
|
|
25 |
|
#include <iostream> |
26 |
|
#include <unordered_set> |
27 |
|
|
28 |
|
#include "base/check.h" |
29 |
|
#include "base/output.h" |
30 |
|
#include "options/base_options.h" |
31 |
|
#include "options/main_options.h" |
32 |
|
#include "options/prop_options.h" |
33 |
|
#include "options/smt_options.h" |
34 |
|
#include "proof/clause_id.h" |
35 |
|
#include "prop/minisat/minisat.h" |
36 |
|
#include "prop/minisat/mtl/Sort.h" |
37 |
|
#include "prop/theory_proxy.h" |
38 |
|
|
39 |
|
using namespace cvc5::prop; |
40 |
|
|
41 |
|
namespace cvc5 { |
42 |
|
namespace Minisat { |
43 |
|
|
44 |
|
namespace { |
45 |
|
/* |
46 |
|
* Returns true if the solver should add all clauses at the current assertion |
47 |
|
* level. |
48 |
|
* |
49 |
|
* FIXME: This is a workaround. Currently, our resolution proofs do not |
50 |
|
* handle clauses with a lower-than-assertion-level correctly because the |
51 |
|
* resolution proofs get removed when popping the context but the SAT solver |
52 |
|
* keeps using them. |
53 |
|
*/ |
54 |
12389772 |
bool assertionLevelOnly() |
55 |
|
{ |
56 |
17449437 |
return (options::produceProofs() || options::unsatCores()) |
57 |
19719889 |
&& options::incrementalSolving(); |
58 |
|
} |
59 |
|
|
60 |
|
//================================================================================================= |
61 |
|
// Helper functions for decision tree tracing |
62 |
|
|
63 |
|
// Writes to Trace macro for decision tree tracing |
64 |
|
static inline void dtviewDecisionHelper(size_t level, |
65 |
|
const Node& node, |
66 |
|
const char* decisiontype) |
67 |
|
{ |
68 |
|
Trace("dtview") << std::string(level - (options::incrementalSolving() ? 1 : 0), '*') |
69 |
|
<< " " << node << " :" << decisiontype << "-DECISION:" << std::endl; |
70 |
|
} |
71 |
|
|
72 |
|
// Writes to Trace macro for propagation tracing |
73 |
|
static inline void dtviewPropagationHeaderHelper(size_t level) |
74 |
|
{ |
75 |
|
Trace("dtview::prop") << std::string(level + 1 - (options::incrementalSolving() ? 1 : 0), |
76 |
|
'*') |
77 |
|
<< " /Propagations/" << std::endl; |
78 |
|
} |
79 |
|
|
80 |
|
// Writes to Trace macro for propagation tracing |
81 |
|
static inline void dtviewBoolPropagationHelper(size_t level, |
82 |
|
Lit& l, |
83 |
|
cvc5::prop::TheoryProxy* proxy) |
84 |
|
{ |
85 |
|
Trace("dtview::prop") << std::string( |
86 |
|
level + 1 - (options::incrementalSolving() ? 1 : 0), ' ') |
87 |
|
<< ":BOOL-PROP: " |
88 |
|
<< proxy->getNode(MinisatSatSolver::toSatLiteral(l)) |
89 |
|
<< std::endl; |
90 |
|
} |
91 |
|
|
92 |
|
// Writes to Trace macro for conflict tracing |
93 |
|
static inline void dtviewPropConflictHelper(size_t level, |
94 |
|
Clause& confl, |
95 |
|
cvc5::prop::TheoryProxy* proxy) |
96 |
|
{ |
97 |
|
Trace("dtview::conflict") |
98 |
|
<< std::string(level + 1 - (options::incrementalSolving() ? 1 : 0), ' ') |
99 |
|
<< ":PROP-CONFLICT: (or"; |
100 |
|
for (int i = 0; i < confl.size(); i++) |
101 |
|
{ |
102 |
|
Trace("dtview::conflict") |
103 |
|
<< " " << proxy->getNode(MinisatSatSolver::toSatLiteral(confl[i])); |
104 |
|
} |
105 |
|
Trace("dtview::conflict") << ")" << std::endl; |
106 |
|
} |
107 |
|
|
108 |
|
} // namespace |
109 |
|
|
110 |
|
//================================================================================================= |
111 |
|
// Options: |
112 |
|
|
113 |
|
static const char* _cat = "CORE"; |
114 |
|
|
115 |
9834 |
static DoubleOption opt_var_decay (_cat, "var-decay", "The variable activity decay factor", 0.95, DoubleRange(0, false, 1, false)); |
116 |
9834 |
static DoubleOption opt_clause_decay (_cat, "cla-decay", "The clause activity decay factor", 0.999, DoubleRange(0, false, 1, false)); |
117 |
9834 |
static DoubleOption opt_random_var_freq (_cat, "rnd-freq", "The frequency with which the decision heuristic tries to choose a random variable", 0, DoubleRange(0, true, 1, true)); |
118 |
9834 |
static DoubleOption opt_random_seed (_cat, "rnd-seed", "Used by the random variable selection", 91648253, DoubleRange(0, false, HUGE_VAL, false)); |
119 |
9834 |
static IntOption opt_ccmin_mode (_cat, "ccmin-mode", "Controls conflict clause minimization (0=none, 1=basic, 2=deep)", 2, IntRange(0, 2)); |
120 |
9834 |
static IntOption opt_phase_saving (_cat, "phase-saving", "Controls the level of phase saving (0=none, 1=limited, 2=full)", 2, IntRange(0, 2)); |
121 |
9834 |
static BoolOption opt_rnd_init_act (_cat, "rnd-init", "Randomize the initial activity", false); |
122 |
9834 |
static BoolOption opt_luby_restart (_cat, "luby", "Use the Luby restart sequence", true); |
123 |
9834 |
static IntOption opt_restart_first (_cat, "rfirst", "The base restart interval", 25, IntRange(1, INT32_MAX)); |
124 |
9834 |
static DoubleOption opt_restart_inc (_cat, "rinc", "Restart interval increase factor", 3, DoubleRange(1, false, HUGE_VAL, false)); |
125 |
9834 |
static DoubleOption opt_garbage_frac (_cat, "gc-frac", "The fraction of wasted memory allowed before a garbage collection is triggered", 0.20, DoubleRange(0, false, HUGE_VAL, false)); |
126 |
|
|
127 |
|
//================================================================================================= |
128 |
|
// Proof declarations |
129 |
|
CRef Solver::TCRef_Undef = CRef_Undef; |
130 |
|
CRef Solver::TCRef_Lazy = CRef_Lazy; |
131 |
|
|
132 |
|
class ScopedBool |
133 |
|
{ |
134 |
|
bool& d_watch; |
135 |
|
bool d_oldValue; |
136 |
|
|
137 |
|
public: |
138 |
3635802 |
ScopedBool(bool& watch, bool newValue) : d_watch(watch), d_oldValue(watch) |
139 |
|
{ |
140 |
3635802 |
watch = newValue; |
141 |
3635802 |
} |
142 |
3635802 |
~ScopedBool() { d_watch = d_oldValue; } |
143 |
|
}; |
144 |
|
|
145 |
|
//================================================================================================= |
146 |
|
// Constructor/Destructor: |
147 |
|
|
148 |
9980 |
Solver::Solver(cvc5::prop::TheoryProxy* proxy, |
149 |
|
cvc5::context::Context* context, |
150 |
|
cvc5::context::UserContext* userContext, |
151 |
|
ProofNodeManager* pnm, |
152 |
9980 |
bool enableIncremental) |
153 |
|
: d_proxy(proxy), |
154 |
|
d_context(context), |
155 |
|
assertionLevel(0), |
156 |
|
d_pfManager(nullptr), |
157 |
|
d_enable_incremental(enableIncremental), |
158 |
|
minisat_busy(false) |
159 |
|
// Parameters (user settable): |
160 |
|
// |
161 |
|
, |
162 |
|
verbosity(0), |
163 |
|
var_decay(opt_var_decay), |
164 |
|
clause_decay(opt_clause_decay), |
165 |
|
random_var_freq(opt_random_var_freq), |
166 |
|
random_seed(opt_random_seed), |
167 |
|
luby_restart(opt_luby_restart), |
168 |
|
ccmin_mode(opt_ccmin_mode), |
169 |
|
phase_saving(opt_phase_saving), |
170 |
|
rnd_pol(false), |
171 |
|
rnd_init_act(opt_rnd_init_act), |
172 |
|
garbage_frac(opt_garbage_frac), |
173 |
|
restart_first(opt_restart_first), |
174 |
|
restart_inc(opt_restart_inc) |
175 |
|
|
176 |
|
// Parameters (the rest): |
177 |
|
// |
178 |
|
, |
179 |
|
learntsize_factor(1), |
180 |
|
learntsize_inc(1.5) |
181 |
|
|
182 |
|
// Parameters (experimental): |
183 |
|
// |
184 |
|
, |
185 |
|
learntsize_adjust_start_confl(100), |
186 |
|
learntsize_adjust_inc(1.5) |
187 |
|
|
188 |
|
// Statistics: (formerly in 'SolverStats') |
189 |
|
// |
190 |
|
, |
191 |
|
solves(0), |
192 |
|
starts(0), |
193 |
|
decisions(0), |
194 |
|
rnd_decisions(0), |
195 |
|
propagations(0), |
196 |
|
conflicts(0), |
197 |
|
resources_consumed(0), |
198 |
|
dec_vars(0), |
199 |
|
clauses_literals(0), |
200 |
|
learnts_literals(0), |
201 |
|
max_literals(0), |
202 |
|
tot_literals(0) |
203 |
|
|
204 |
|
, |
205 |
|
ok(true), |
206 |
|
cla_inc(1), |
207 |
|
var_inc(1), |
208 |
19960 |
watches(WatcherDeleted(ca)), |
209 |
|
qhead(0), |
210 |
|
simpDB_assigns(-1), |
211 |
|
simpDB_props(0), |
212 |
19960 |
order_heap(VarOrderLt(activity)), |
213 |
|
progress_estimate(0), |
214 |
9980 |
remove_satisfied(!enableIncremental) |
215 |
|
|
216 |
|
// Resource constraints: |
217 |
|
// |
218 |
|
, |
219 |
|
conflict_budget(-1), |
220 |
|
propagation_budget(-1), |
221 |
59880 |
asynch_interrupt(false) |
222 |
|
{ |
223 |
9980 |
if (pnm) |
224 |
|
{ |
225 |
2498 |
d_pfManager.reset( |
226 |
1249 |
new SatProofManager(this, proxy->getCnfStream(), userContext, pnm)); |
227 |
|
} |
228 |
|
|
229 |
|
// Create the constant variables |
230 |
9980 |
varTrue = newVar(true, false, false); |
231 |
9980 |
varFalse = newVar(false, false, false); |
232 |
|
|
233 |
|
// Assert the constants |
234 |
9980 |
uncheckedEnqueue(mkLit(varTrue, false)); |
235 |
9980 |
uncheckedEnqueue(mkLit(varFalse, true)); |
236 |
9980 |
} |
237 |
|
|
238 |
|
|
239 |
9977 |
Solver::~Solver() |
240 |
|
{ |
241 |
9977 |
} |
242 |
|
|
243 |
|
|
244 |
|
//================================================================================================= |
245 |
|
// Minor methods: |
246 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
248 |
|
// Creates a new SAT variable in the solver. If 'decision_var' is cleared, variable will not be |
249 |
|
// used as a decision variable (NOTE! This has effects on the meaning of a SATISFIABLE result). |
250 |
|
// |
251 |
1291221 |
Var Solver::newVar(bool sign, bool dvar, bool isTheoryAtom, bool preRegister, bool canErase) |
252 |
|
{ |
253 |
1291221 |
int v = nVars(); |
254 |
|
|
255 |
1291221 |
watches .init(mkLit(v, false)); |
256 |
1291221 |
watches .init(mkLit(v, true )); |
257 |
1291221 |
assigns .push(l_Undef); |
258 |
1291221 |
vardata .push(VarData(CRef_Undef, -1, -1, assertionLevel, -1)); |
259 |
1291221 |
activity .push(rnd_init_act ? drand(random_seed) * 0.00001 : 0); |
260 |
1291221 |
seen .push(0); |
261 |
1291221 |
polarity .push(sign); |
262 |
1291221 |
decision .push(); |
263 |
1291221 |
trail .capacity(v+1); |
264 |
|
// push whether it corresponds to a theory atom |
265 |
1291221 |
theory.push(isTheoryAtom); |
266 |
|
|
267 |
1291221 |
setDecisionVar(v, dvar); |
268 |
|
|
269 |
1291221 |
Debug("minisat") << "new var " << v << std::endl; |
270 |
|
|
271 |
|
// If the variable is introduced at non-zero level, we need to reintroduce it on backtracks |
272 |
1291221 |
if (preRegister) |
273 |
|
{ |
274 |
1203938 |
Debug("minisat") << " To register at level " << decisionLevel() |
275 |
601969 |
<< std::endl; |
276 |
601969 |
variables_to_register.push(VarIntroInfo(v, decisionLevel())); |
277 |
|
} |
278 |
|
|
279 |
1291221 |
return v; |
280 |
|
} |
281 |
|
|
282 |
4869 |
void Solver::resizeVars(int newSize) { |
283 |
4869 |
Assert(d_enable_incremental); |
284 |
4869 |
Assert(decisionLevel() == 0); |
285 |
4869 |
Assert(newSize >= 2) << "always keep true/false"; |
286 |
4869 |
if (newSize < nVars()) { |
287 |
3067 |
int shrinkSize = nVars() - newSize; |
288 |
|
|
289 |
|
// Resize watches up to the negated last literal |
290 |
3067 |
watches.resizeTo(mkLit(newSize-1, true)); |
291 |
|
|
292 |
|
// Resize all info arrays |
293 |
3067 |
assigns.shrink(shrinkSize); |
294 |
3067 |
vardata.shrink(shrinkSize); |
295 |
3067 |
activity.shrink(shrinkSize); |
296 |
3067 |
seen.shrink(shrinkSize); |
297 |
3067 |
polarity.shrink(shrinkSize); |
298 |
3067 |
decision.shrink(shrinkSize); |
299 |
3067 |
theory.shrink(shrinkSize); |
300 |
|
} |
301 |
|
|
302 |
4869 |
if (Debug.isOn("minisat::pop")) { |
303 |
|
for (int i = 0; i < trail.size(); ++ i) { |
304 |
|
Assert(var(trail[i]) < nVars()); |
305 |
|
} |
306 |
|
} |
307 |
4869 |
} |
308 |
|
|
309 |
169893921 |
CRef Solver::reason(Var x) { |
310 |
169893921 |
Trace("pf::sat") << "Solver::reason(" << x << ")" << std::endl; |
311 |
|
|
312 |
|
// If we already have a reason, just return it |
313 |
169893921 |
if (vardata[x].d_reason != CRef_Lazy) |
314 |
|
{ |
315 |
169847971 |
if (Trace.isOn("pf::sat")) |
316 |
|
{ |
317 |
|
Trace("pf::sat") << " Solver::reason: " << vardata[x].d_reason << ", "; |
318 |
|
if (vardata[x].d_reason == CRef_Undef) |
319 |
|
{ |
320 |
|
Trace("pf::sat") << "CRef_Undef"; |
321 |
|
} |
322 |
|
else |
323 |
|
{ |
324 |
|
for (unsigned i = 0, size = ca[vardata[x].d_reason].size(); i < size; |
325 |
|
++i) |
326 |
|
{ |
327 |
|
Trace("pf::sat") << ca[vardata[x].d_reason][i] << " "; |
328 |
|
} |
329 |
|
} |
330 |
|
Trace("pf::sat") << "\n"; |
331 |
|
} |
332 |
169847971 |
return vardata[x].d_reason; |
333 |
|
} |
334 |
|
// What's the literal we are trying to explain |
335 |
45950 |
Lit l = mkLit(x, value(x) != l_True); |
336 |
|
|
337 |
|
// Get the explanation from the theory |
338 |
91900 |
SatClause explanation_cl; |
339 |
|
// FIXME: at some point return a tag with the theory that spawned you |
340 |
45950 |
d_proxy->explainPropagation(MinisatSatSolver::toSatLiteral(l), |
341 |
|
explanation_cl); |
342 |
91900 |
vec<Lit> explanation; |
343 |
45950 |
MinisatSatSolver::toMinisatClause(explanation_cl, explanation); |
344 |
|
|
345 |
91900 |
Trace("pf::sat") << "Solver::reason: explanation_cl = " << explanation_cl |
346 |
45950 |
<< std::endl; |
347 |
|
|
348 |
|
// Sort the literals by trail index level |
349 |
45950 |
lemma_lt lt(*this); |
350 |
45950 |
sort(explanation, lt); |
351 |
45950 |
Assert(explanation[0] == l); |
352 |
|
|
353 |
|
// Compute the assertion level for this clause |
354 |
45950 |
int explLevel = 0; |
355 |
45950 |
if (assertionLevelOnly()) |
356 |
|
{ |
357 |
1585 |
explLevel = assertionLevel; |
358 |
|
} |
359 |
|
else |
360 |
|
{ |
361 |
|
int i, j; |
362 |
44365 |
Lit prev = lit_Undef; |
363 |
322005 |
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < explanation.size(); ++i) |
364 |
|
{ |
365 |
|
// This clause is valid theory propagation, so its level is the level of |
366 |
|
// the top literal |
367 |
277640 |
explLevel = std::max(explLevel, intro_level(var(explanation[i]))); |
368 |
|
|
369 |
277640 |
Assert(value(explanation[i]) != l_Undef); |
370 |
277640 |
Assert(i == 0 |
371 |
|
|| trail_index(var(explanation[0])) |
372 |
|
> trail_index(var(explanation[i]))); |
373 |
|
|
374 |
|
// Always keep the first literal |
375 |
322005 |
if (i == 0) |
376 |
|
{ |
377 |
44365 |
prev = explanation[j++] = explanation[i]; |
378 |
44365 |
continue; |
379 |
|
} |
380 |
|
// Ignore duplicate literals |
381 |
233275 |
if (explanation[i] == prev) |
382 |
|
{ |
383 |
|
continue; |
384 |
|
} |
385 |
|
// Ignore zero level literals |
386 |
466550 |
if (level(var(explanation[i])) == 0 |
387 |
233275 |
&& user_level(var(explanation[i]) == 0)) |
388 |
|
{ |
389 |
|
continue; |
390 |
|
} |
391 |
|
// Keep this literal |
392 |
233275 |
prev = explanation[j++] = explanation[i]; |
393 |
|
} |
394 |
44365 |
explanation.shrink(i - j); |
395 |
|
|
396 |
44365 |
Trace("pf::sat") << "Solver::reason: explanation = "; |
397 |
322005 |
for (int k = 0; k < explanation.size(); ++k) |
398 |
|
{ |
399 |
277640 |
Trace("pf::sat") << explanation[k] << " "; |
400 |
|
} |
401 |
44365 |
Trace("pf::sat") << std::endl; |
402 |
|
|
403 |
|
// We need an explanation clause so we add a fake literal |
404 |
44365 |
if (j == 1) |
405 |
|
{ |
406 |
|
// Add not TRUE to the clause |
407 |
|
explanation.push(mkLit(varTrue, true)); |
408 |
|
} |
409 |
|
} |
410 |
|
|
411 |
|
// Construct the reason |
412 |
45950 |
CRef real_reason = ca.alloc(explLevel, explanation, true); |
413 |
45950 |
vardata[x] = VarData(real_reason, level(x), user_level(x), intro_level(x), trail_index(x)); |
414 |
45950 |
clauses_removable.push(real_reason); |
415 |
45950 |
attachClause(real_reason); |
416 |
|
|
417 |
45950 |
return real_reason; |
418 |
|
} |
419 |
|
|
420 |
3836193 |
bool Solver::addClause_(vec<Lit>& ps, bool removable, ClauseId& id) |
421 |
|
{ |
422 |
3836193 |
if (!ok) return false; |
423 |
|
|
424 |
|
// Check if clause is satisfied and remove false/duplicate literals: |
425 |
3836193 |
sort(ps); |
426 |
|
Lit p; int i, j; |
427 |
|
|
428 |
|
// Which user-level to assert this clause at |
429 |
3836193 |
int clauseLevel = (removable && !assertionLevelOnly()) ? 0 : assertionLevel; |
430 |
|
|
431 |
|
// Check the clause for tautologies and similar |
432 |
3836193 |
int falseLiteralsCount = 0; |
433 |
15298940 |
for (i = j = 0, p = lit_Undef; i < ps.size(); i++) { |
434 |
|
// Update the level |
435 |
23299768 |
clauseLevel = assertionLevelOnly() |
436 |
22679644 |
? assertionLevel |
437 |
22679644 |
: std::max(clauseLevel, intro_level(var(ps[i]))); |
438 |
|
// Tautologies are ignored |
439 |
11649884 |
if (ps[i] == ~p) { |
440 |
17589 |
id = ClauseIdUndef; |
441 |
|
// Clause can be ignored |
442 |
17589 |
return true; |
443 |
|
} |
444 |
|
// Clauses with 0-level true literals are also ignored |
445 |
11632295 |
if (value(ps[i]) == l_True && level(var(ps[i])) == 0 && user_level(var(ps[i])) == 0) { |
446 |
169548 |
id = ClauseIdUndef; |
447 |
169548 |
return true; |
448 |
|
} |
449 |
|
// Ignore repeated literals |
450 |
11462747 |
if (ps[i] == p) { |
451 |
19349 |
continue; |
452 |
|
} |
453 |
|
// If a literal is false at 0 level (both sat and user level) we also |
454 |
|
// ignore it, unless we are tracking the SAT solver's reasoning |
455 |
11443398 |
if (value(ps[i]) == l_False) { |
456 |
7451681 |
if (!options::unsatCores() && !needProof() && level(var(ps[i])) == 0 |
457 |
3670134 |
&& user_level(var(ps[i])) == 0) |
458 |
|
{ |
459 |
783332 |
continue; |
460 |
|
} |
461 |
|
else |
462 |
|
{ |
463 |
|
// If we decide to keep it, we count it into the false literals |
464 |
2082942 |
falseLiteralsCount++; |
465 |
|
} |
466 |
|
} |
467 |
|
// This literal is a keeper |
468 |
10660066 |
ps[j++] = p = ps[i]; |
469 |
|
} |
470 |
|
|
471 |
|
// Fit to size |
472 |
3649056 |
ps.shrink(i - j); |
473 |
|
|
474 |
|
// If we are in solve_ or propagate |
475 |
3649056 |
if (minisat_busy) |
476 |
|
{ |
477 |
2171517 |
Trace("pf::sat") << "Add clause adding a new lemma: "; |
478 |
8914409 |
for (int k = 0; k < ps.size(); ++k) { |
479 |
6742892 |
Trace("pf::sat") << ps[k] << " "; |
480 |
|
} |
481 |
2171517 |
Trace("pf::sat") << std::endl; |
482 |
|
|
483 |
2171517 |
lemmas.push(); |
484 |
2171517 |
ps.copyTo(lemmas.last()); |
485 |
2171517 |
lemmas_removable.push(removable); |
486 |
|
} else { |
487 |
1477539 |
Assert(decisionLevel() == 0); |
488 |
|
|
489 |
|
// If all false, we're in conflict |
490 |
1477539 |
if (ps.size() == falseLiteralsCount) { |
491 |
1339 |
if (options::unsatCores() || needProof()) |
492 |
|
{ |
493 |
|
// Take care of false units here; otherwise, we need to |
494 |
|
// construct the clause below to give to the proof manager |
495 |
|
// as the final conflict. |
496 |
488 |
if(falseLiteralsCount == 1) { |
497 |
469 |
if (needProof()) |
498 |
|
{ |
499 |
469 |
d_pfManager->finalizeProof(ps[0], true); |
500 |
|
} |
501 |
83955 |
return ok = false; |
502 |
|
} |
503 |
|
} |
504 |
|
else |
505 |
|
{ |
506 |
851 |
return ok = false; |
507 |
|
} |
508 |
|
} |
509 |
|
|
510 |
1476219 |
CRef cr = CRef_Undef; |
511 |
|
|
512 |
|
// If not unit, add the clause |
513 |
1476219 |
if (ps.size() > 1) { |
514 |
|
|
515 |
1397397 |
lemma_lt lt(*this); |
516 |
1397397 |
sort(ps, lt); |
517 |
|
|
518 |
1397397 |
cr = ca.alloc(clauseLevel, ps, false); |
519 |
1397397 |
clauses_persistent.push(cr); |
520 |
1397397 |
attachClause(cr); |
521 |
|
|
522 |
1397397 |
if (options::unsatCores() || needProof()) |
523 |
|
{ |
524 |
660933 |
if (ps.size() == falseLiteralsCount) |
525 |
|
{ |
526 |
19 |
if (needProof()) |
527 |
|
{ |
528 |
19 |
d_pfManager->finalizeProof(ca[cr], true); |
529 |
|
} |
530 |
19 |
return ok = false; |
531 |
|
} |
532 |
|
} |
533 |
|
} |
534 |
|
|
535 |
|
// Check if it propagates |
536 |
1476200 |
if (ps.size() == falseLiteralsCount + 1) { |
537 |
82147 |
if(assigns[var(ps[0])] == l_Undef) { |
538 |
79805 |
Assert(assigns[var(ps[0])] != l_False); |
539 |
79805 |
uncheckedEnqueue(ps[0], cr); |
540 |
159610 |
Debug("cores") << "i'm registering a unit clause, maybe input" |
541 |
79805 |
<< std::endl; |
542 |
79805 |
if (ps.size() == 1) |
543 |
|
{ |
544 |
|
// We need to do this so that the closedness check, if being done, |
545 |
|
// goes through when we have unit assumptions whose literal has |
546 |
|
// already been registered, as the ProofCnfStream will not register |
547 |
|
// them and as they are not the result of propagation will be left |
548 |
|
// hanging in assumptions accumulator |
549 |
77306 |
if (needProof()) |
550 |
|
{ |
551 |
23604 |
d_pfManager->registerSatLitAssumption(ps[0]); |
552 |
|
} |
553 |
|
} |
554 |
79805 |
CRef confl = propagate(CHECK_WITHOUT_THEORY); |
555 |
79805 |
if(! (ok = (confl == CRef_Undef)) ) { |
556 |
38 |
if (needProof()) |
557 |
|
{ |
558 |
13 |
if (ca[confl].size() == 1) |
559 |
|
{ |
560 |
|
d_pfManager->finalizeProof(ca[confl][0]); |
561 |
|
} |
562 |
|
else |
563 |
|
{ |
564 |
13 |
d_pfManager->finalizeProof(ca[confl]); |
565 |
|
} |
566 |
|
} |
567 |
|
} |
568 |
79805 |
return ok; |
569 |
|
} else { |
570 |
2342 |
return ok; |
571 |
|
} |
572 |
|
} |
573 |
|
} |
574 |
|
|
575 |
3565570 |
return true; |
576 |
|
} |
577 |
|
|
578 |
|
|
579 |
3933993 |
void Solver::attachClause(CRef cr) { |
580 |
3933993 |
const Clause& c = ca[cr]; |
581 |
3933993 |
if (Debug.isOn("minisat")) |
582 |
|
{ |
583 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "Solver::attachClause(" << c << "): "; |
584 |
|
for (unsigned i = 0, size = c.size(); i < size; ++i) |
585 |
|
{ |
586 |
|
Debug("minisat") << c[i] << " "; |
587 |
|
} |
588 |
|
Debug("minisat") << ", level " << c.level() << "\n"; |
589 |
|
} |
590 |
3933993 |
Assert(c.size() > 1); |
591 |
3933993 |
watches[~c[0]].push(Watcher(cr, c[1])); |
592 |
3933993 |
watches[~c[1]].push(Watcher(cr, c[0])); |
593 |
3933993 |
if (c.removable()) learnts_literals += c.size(); |
594 |
3396408 |
else clauses_literals += c.size(); |
595 |
3933993 |
} |
596 |
|
|
597 |
|
|
598 |
850447 |
void Solver::detachClause(CRef cr, bool strict) { |
599 |
850447 |
const Clause& c = ca[cr]; |
600 |
850447 |
Debug("minisat") << "Solver::detachClause(" << c << ")" << std::endl; |
601 |
850447 |
if (Debug.isOn("minisat")) |
602 |
|
{ |
603 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "Solver::detachClause(" << c << "), CRef " << cr |
604 |
|
<< ", clause "; |
605 |
|
for (unsigned i = 0, size = c.size(); i < size; ++i) |
606 |
|
{ |
607 |
|
Debug("minisat") << c[i] << " "; |
608 |
|
} |
609 |
|
|
610 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "\n"; |
611 |
|
} |
612 |
850447 |
Assert(c.size() > 1); |
613 |
|
|
614 |
850447 |
if (strict){ |
615 |
89047 |
remove(watches[~c[0]], Watcher(cr, c[1])); |
616 |
89047 |
remove(watches[~c[1]], Watcher(cr, c[0])); |
617 |
|
}else{ |
618 |
|
// Lazy detaching: (NOTE! Must clean all watcher lists before garbage collecting this clause) |
619 |
761400 |
watches.smudge(~c[0]); |
620 |
761400 |
watches.smudge(~c[1]); |
621 |
|
} |
622 |
|
|
623 |
850447 |
if (c.removable()) learnts_literals -= c.size(); |
624 |
583887 |
else clauses_literals -= c.size(); } |
625 |
|
|
626 |
|
|
627 |
761400 |
void Solver::removeClause(CRef cr) { |
628 |
761400 |
Clause& c = ca[cr]; |
629 |
761400 |
if (Debug.isOn("minisat")) |
630 |
|
{ |
631 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "Solver::removeClause(" << c << "), CRef " << cr |
632 |
|
<< ", clause "; |
633 |
|
for (unsigned i = 0, size = c.size(); i < size; ++i) |
634 |
|
{ |
635 |
|
Debug("minisat") << c[i] << " "; |
636 |
|
} |
637 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "\n"; |
638 |
|
} |
639 |
761400 |
detachClause(cr); |
640 |
|
// Don't leave pointers to free'd memory! |
641 |
761400 |
if (locked(c)) |
642 |
|
{ |
643 |
|
// a locked clause c is one whose first literal c[0] is true and is |
644 |
|
// propagated by c itself, i.e. vardata[var(c[0])].d_reason == c. Because |
645 |
|
// of this if we need to justify the propagation of c[0], via |
646 |
|
// Solver::reason, if it appears in a resolution chain built lazily we |
647 |
|
// will be unable to do so after the step below. Thus we eagerly justify |
648 |
|
// this propagation here. |
649 |
11059 |
if (needProof()) |
650 |
|
{ |
651 |
2554 |
Trace("pf::sat") |
652 |
1277 |
<< "Solver::removeClause: eagerly compute propagation of " << c[0] |
653 |
1277 |
<< "\n"; |
654 |
1277 |
d_pfManager->startResChain(c); |
655 |
5847 |
for (unsigned i = 1, size = c.size(); i < size; ++i) |
656 |
|
{ |
657 |
4570 |
d_pfManager->addResolutionStep(c[i]); |
658 |
|
} |
659 |
1277 |
d_pfManager->endResChain(c[0]); |
660 |
|
} |
661 |
11059 |
vardata[var(c[0])].d_reason = CRef_Undef; |
662 |
|
} |
663 |
761400 |
c.mark(1); |
664 |
761400 |
ca.free(cr); |
665 |
761400 |
} |
666 |
|
|
667 |
|
|
668 |
469020 |
bool Solver::satisfied(const Clause& c) const { |
669 |
21567464 |
for (int i = 0; i < c.size(); i++) |
670 |
21143661 |
if (value(c[i]) == l_True) |
671 |
45217 |
return true; |
672 |
423803 |
return false; } |
673 |
|
|
674 |
|
|
675 |
|
// Revert to the state at given level (keeping all assignment at 'level' but not beyond). |
676 |
|
// |
677 |
582477 |
void Solver::cancelUntil(int level) { |
678 |
582477 |
Debug("minisat") << "minisat::cancelUntil(" << level << ")" << std::endl; |
679 |
|
|
680 |
582477 |
if (decisionLevel() > level){ |
681 |
|
// Pop the SMT context |
682 |
3523820 |
for (int l = trail_lim.size() - level; l > 0; --l) { |
683 |
3067073 |
d_context->pop(); |
684 |
|
} |
685 |
117524357 |
for (int c = trail.size()-1; c >= trail_lim[level]; c--){ |
686 |
117067610 |
Var x = var(trail[c]); |
687 |
117067610 |
assigns [x] = l_Undef; |
688 |
117067610 |
vardata[x].d_trail_index = -1; |
689 |
234135220 |
if ((phase_saving > 1 || |
690 |
|
((phase_saving == 1) && c > trail_lim.last()) |
691 |
234135220 |
) && ((polarity[x] & 0x2) == 0)) { |
692 |
116131717 |
polarity[x] = sign(trail[c]); |
693 |
|
} |
694 |
117067610 |
insertVarOrder(x); |
695 |
|
} |
696 |
456747 |
qhead = trail_lim[level]; |
697 |
456747 |
trail.shrink(trail.size() - trail_lim[level]); |
698 |
456747 |
trail_lim.shrink(trail_lim.size() - level); |
699 |
456747 |
flipped.shrink(flipped.size() - level); |
700 |
|
|
701 |
|
// Register variables that have not been registered yet |
702 |
456747 |
int currentLevel = decisionLevel(); |
703 |
914636 |
for (int i = variables_to_register.size() - 1; |
704 |
914636 |
i >= 0 && variables_to_register[i].d_level > currentLevel; |
705 |
|
--i) |
706 |
|
{ |
707 |
457889 |
variables_to_register[i].d_level = currentLevel; |
708 |
915778 |
d_proxy->variableNotify( |
709 |
457889 |
MinisatSatSolver::toSatVariable(variables_to_register[i].d_var)); |
710 |
|
} |
711 |
|
} |
712 |
582477 |
} |
713 |
|
|
714 |
15221 |
void Solver::resetTrail() { cancelUntil(0); } |
715 |
|
|
716 |
|
//================================================================================================= |
717 |
|
// Major methods: |
718 |
|
|
719 |
|
|
720 |
2789239 |
Lit Solver::pickBranchLit() |
721 |
|
{ |
722 |
|
Lit nextLit; |
723 |
|
|
724 |
|
// Theory requests |
725 |
2789237 |
nextLit = |
726 |
2789239 |
MinisatSatSolver::toMinisatLit(d_proxy->getNextTheoryDecisionRequest()); |
727 |
2809953 |
while (nextLit != lit_Undef) { |
728 |
62326 |
if(value(var(nextLit)) == l_Undef) { |
729 |
103936 |
Debug("theoryDecision") |
730 |
51968 |
<< "getNextTheoryDecisionRequest(): now deciding on " << nextLit |
731 |
51968 |
<< std::endl; |
732 |
51968 |
decisions++; |
733 |
|
|
734 |
|
// org-mode tracing -- theory decision |
735 |
51968 |
if (Trace.isOn("dtview")) |
736 |
|
{ |
737 |
|
dtviewDecisionHelper( |
738 |
|
d_context->getLevel(), |
739 |
|
d_proxy->getNode(MinisatSatSolver::toSatLiteral(nextLit)), |
740 |
|
"THEORY"); |
741 |
|
} |
742 |
|
|
743 |
51968 |
if (Trace.isOn("dtview::prop")) |
744 |
|
{ |
745 |
|
dtviewPropagationHeaderHelper(d_context->getLevel()); |
746 |
|
} |
747 |
|
|
748 |
51968 |
return nextLit; |
749 |
|
} else { |
750 |
20716 |
Debug("theoryDecision") |
751 |
10358 |
<< "getNextTheoryDecisionRequest(): would decide on " << nextLit |
752 |
10358 |
<< " but it already has an assignment" << std::endl; |
753 |
|
} |
754 |
10358 |
nextLit = MinisatSatSolver::toMinisatLit( |
755 |
10358 |
d_proxy->getNextTheoryDecisionRequest()); |
756 |
|
} |
757 |
5474538 |
Debug("theoryDecision") |
758 |
2737269 |
<< "getNextTheoryDecisionRequest(): decide on another literal" |
759 |
2737269 |
<< std::endl; |
760 |
|
|
761 |
|
// DE requests |
762 |
2737269 |
bool stopSearch = false; |
763 |
2737269 |
nextLit = MinisatSatSolver::toMinisatLit( |
764 |
2737269 |
d_proxy->getNextDecisionEngineRequest(stopSearch)); |
765 |
2737269 |
if(stopSearch) { |
766 |
53201 |
return lit_Undef; |
767 |
|
} |
768 |
2684068 |
if(nextLit != lit_Undef) { |
769 |
1179959 |
Assert(value(var(nextLit)) == l_Undef) |
770 |
|
<< "literal to decide already has value"; |
771 |
1179959 |
decisions++; |
772 |
1179959 |
Var next = var(nextLit); |
773 |
1179959 |
if(polarity[next] & 0x2) { |
774 |
225535 |
nextLit = mkLit(next, polarity[next] & 0x1); |
775 |
|
} |
776 |
|
|
777 |
|
// org-mode tracing -- decision engine decision |
778 |
1179959 |
if (Trace.isOn("dtview")) |
779 |
|
{ |
780 |
|
dtviewDecisionHelper( |
781 |
|
d_context->getLevel(), |
782 |
|
d_proxy->getNode(MinisatSatSolver::toSatLiteral(nextLit)), |
783 |
|
"DE"); |
784 |
|
} |
785 |
|
|
786 |
1179959 |
if (Trace.isOn("dtview::prop")) |
787 |
|
{ |
788 |
|
dtviewPropagationHeaderHelper(d_context->getLevel()); |
789 |
|
} |
790 |
|
|
791 |
1179959 |
return nextLit; |
792 |
|
} |
793 |
|
|
794 |
1504109 |
Var next = var_Undef; |
795 |
|
|
796 |
|
// Random decision: |
797 |
1504109 |
if (drand(random_seed) < random_var_freq && !order_heap.empty()){ |
798 |
|
next = order_heap[irand(random_seed,order_heap.size())]; |
799 |
|
if (value(next) == l_Undef && decision[next]) |
800 |
|
rnd_decisions++; } |
801 |
|
|
802 |
|
// Activity based decision: |
803 |
10974093 |
while (next >= nVars() || next == var_Undef || value(next) != l_Undef || !decision[next]) { |
804 |
4752845 |
if (order_heap.empty()){ |
805 |
17853 |
next = var_Undef; |
806 |
17853 |
break; |
807 |
|
}else { |
808 |
4734992 |
next = order_heap.removeMin(); |
809 |
|
} |
810 |
|
|
811 |
4734992 |
if(!decision[next]) continue; |
812 |
|
// Check with decision engine about relevancy |
813 |
9444680 |
if (d_proxy->isDecisionRelevant(MinisatSatSolver::toSatVariable(next)) |
814 |
4722340 |
== false) |
815 |
|
{ |
816 |
|
next = var_Undef; |
817 |
|
} |
818 |
|
} |
819 |
|
|
820 |
1504109 |
if(next == var_Undef) { |
821 |
17853 |
return lit_Undef; |
822 |
|
} else { |
823 |
1486256 |
decisions++; |
824 |
|
// Check with decision engine if it can tell polarity |
825 |
|
lbool dec_pol = MinisatSatSolver::toMinisatlbool( |
826 |
1486256 |
d_proxy->getDecisionPolarity(MinisatSatSolver::toSatVariable(next))); |
827 |
|
Lit decisionLit; |
828 |
1486256 |
if(dec_pol != l_Undef) { |
829 |
|
Assert(dec_pol == l_True || dec_pol == l_False); |
830 |
|
decisionLit = mkLit(next, (dec_pol == l_True)); |
831 |
|
} |
832 |
|
else |
833 |
|
{ |
834 |
|
// If it can't use internal heuristic to do that |
835 |
1486256 |
decisionLit = mkLit( |
836 |
1486256 |
next, rnd_pol ? drand(random_seed) < 0.5 : (polarity[next] & 0x1)); |
837 |
|
} |
838 |
|
|
839 |
|
// org-mode tracing -- decision engine decision |
840 |
1486256 |
if (Trace.isOn("dtview")) |
841 |
|
{ |
842 |
|
dtviewDecisionHelper( |
843 |
|
d_context->getLevel(), |
844 |
|
d_proxy->getNode(MinisatSatSolver::toSatLiteral(decisionLit)), |
845 |
|
"DE"); |
846 |
|
} |
847 |
|
|
848 |
1486256 |
if (Trace.isOn("dtview::prop")) |
849 |
|
{ |
850 |
|
dtviewPropagationHeaderHelper(d_context->getLevel()); |
851 |
|
} |
852 |
|
|
853 |
1486256 |
return decisionLit; |
854 |
|
} |
855 |
|
} |
856 |
|
|
857 |
|
|
858 |
|
/*_________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
859 |
|
| |
860 |
|
| analyze : (confl : Clause*) (out_learnt : vec<Lit>&) (out_btlevel : int&) -> [void] |
861 |
|
| |
862 |
|
| Description: |
863 |
|
| Analyze conflict and produce a reason clause. |
864 |
|
| |
865 |
|
| Pre-conditions: |
866 |
|
| * 'out_learnt' is assumed to be cleared. |
867 |
|
| * Current decision level must be greater than root level. |
868 |
|
| |
869 |
|
| Post-conditions: |
870 |
|
| * 'out_learnt[0]' is the asserting literal at level 'out_btlevel'. |
871 |
|
| * If out_learnt.size() > 1 then 'out_learnt[1]' has the greatest decision level of the |
872 |
|
| rest of literals. There may be others from the same level though. |
873 |
|
| * returns the maximal level of the resolved clauses |
874 |
|
| |
875 |
|
|________________________________________________________________________________________________@*/ |
876 |
301089 |
int Solver::analyze(CRef confl, vec<Lit>& out_learnt, int& out_btlevel) |
877 |
|
{ |
878 |
602178 |
Trace("pf::sat") << "Solver::analyze: starting with " << confl |
879 |
301089 |
<< " with decision level " << decisionLevel() << "\n"; |
880 |
|
|
881 |
301089 |
int pathC = 0; |
882 |
301089 |
Lit p = lit_Undef; |
883 |
|
|
884 |
|
// Generate conflict clause: |
885 |
|
// |
886 |
301089 |
out_learnt.push(); // (leave room for the asserting literal) |
887 |
301089 |
int index = trail.size() - 1; |
888 |
|
|
889 |
301089 |
int max_resolution_level = 0; // Maximal level of the resolved clauses |
890 |
|
|
891 |
301089 |
if (needProof()) |
892 |
|
{ |
893 |
22566 |
d_pfManager->startResChain(ca[confl]); |
894 |
|
} |
895 |
33327252 |
do{ |
896 |
33628341 |
Assert(confl != CRef_Undef); // (otherwise should be UIP) |
897 |
|
|
898 |
|
{ |
899 |
|
// ! IMPORTANT ! |
900 |
|
// It is not safe to use c after this block of code because |
901 |
|
// resolveOutUnit() below may lead to clauses being allocated, which |
902 |
|
// in turn may lead to reallocations that invalidate c. |
903 |
33628341 |
Clause& c = ca[confl]; |
904 |
33628341 |
max_resolution_level = std::max(max_resolution_level, c.level()); |
905 |
|
|
906 |
33628341 |
if (c.removable()) claBumpActivity(c); |
907 |
|
} |
908 |
|
|
909 |
33628341 |
if (Trace.isOn("pf::sat")) |
910 |
|
{ |
911 |
|
Trace("pf::sat") << "Solver::analyze: conflict clause "; |
912 |
|
for (unsigned i = 0, size = ca[confl].size(); i < size; ++i) |
913 |
|
{ |
914 |
|
Trace("pf::sat") << ca[confl][i] << " "; |
915 |
|
} |
916 |
|
Trace("pf::sat") << "\n"; |
917 |
|
} |
918 |
|
|
919 |
33628341 |
Trace("pf::sat") << cvc5::push; |
920 |
229958650 |
for (int j = (p == lit_Undef) ? 0 : 1, size = ca[confl].size(); |
921 |
229958650 |
j < size; |
922 |
|
j++) |
923 |
|
{ |
924 |
196330309 |
Lit q = ca[confl][j]; |
925 |
|
|
926 |
392660618 |
Trace("pf::sat") << "Lit " << q |
927 |
392660618 |
<< " seen/level: " << (seen[var(q)] ? 1 : 0) << " / " |
928 |
196330309 |
<< level(var(q)) << "\n"; |
929 |
196330309 |
if (!seen[var(q)] && level(var(q)) > 0) |
930 |
|
{ |
931 |
60285817 |
varBumpActivity(var(q)); |
932 |
60285817 |
seen[var(q)] = 1; |
933 |
60285817 |
if (level(var(q)) >= decisionLevel()) |
934 |
33628341 |
pathC++; |
935 |
|
else |
936 |
26657476 |
out_learnt.push(q); |
937 |
|
} |
938 |
|
else |
939 |
|
{ |
940 |
|
// We could be resolving a literal propagated by a clause/theory |
941 |
|
// using information from a higher level |
942 |
136044492 |
if (!seen[var(q)] && level(var(q)) == 0) |
943 |
|
{ |
944 |
400263 |
max_resolution_level = |
945 |
800526 |
std::max(max_resolution_level, user_level(var(q))); |
946 |
|
} |
947 |
|
|
948 |
|
// FIXME: can we do it lazily if we actually need the proof? |
949 |
136044492 |
if (level(var(q)) == 0 && needProof()) |
950 |
|
{ |
951 |
139539 |
d_pfManager->addResolutionStep(q); |
952 |
|
} |
953 |
|
} |
954 |
|
} |
955 |
33628341 |
Trace("pf::sat") << cvc5::pop; |
956 |
|
|
957 |
|
// Select next clause to look at: |
958 |
94156908 |
while (!seen[var(trail[index--])]); |
959 |
33628341 |
p = trail[index+1]; |
960 |
33628341 |
confl = reason(var(p)); |
961 |
33628341 |
seen[var(p)] = 0; |
962 |
33628341 |
pathC--; |
963 |
|
|
964 |
33628341 |
if (pathC > 0 && confl != CRef_Undef && needProof()) |
965 |
|
{ |
966 |
293062 |
d_pfManager->addResolutionStep(ca[confl], p); |
967 |
|
} |
968 |
|
|
969 |
33628341 |
} while (pathC > 0); |
970 |
301089 |
out_learnt[0] = ~p; |
971 |
301089 |
if (Debug.isOn("newproof::sat")) |
972 |
|
{ |
973 |
|
Debug("newproof::sat") << "finished with learnt clause "; |
974 |
|
for (unsigned i = 0, size = out_learnt.size(); i < size; ++i) |
975 |
|
{ |
976 |
|
prop::SatLiteral satLit = toSatLiteral<Minisat::Solver>(out_learnt[i]); |
977 |
|
Debug("newproof::sat") << satLit << " "; |
978 |
|
} |
979 |
|
Debug("newproof::sat") << "\n"; |
980 |
|
} |
981 |
|
|
982 |
|
// Simplify conflict clause: |
983 |
|
int i, j; |
984 |
301089 |
out_learnt.copyTo(analyze_toclear); |
985 |
301089 |
if (ccmin_mode == 2){ |
986 |
301089 |
uint32_t abstract_level = 0; |
987 |
26958565 |
for (i = 1; i < out_learnt.size(); i++) |
988 |
26657476 |
abstract_level |= abstractLevel(var(out_learnt[i])); // (maintain an abstraction of levels involved in conflict) |
989 |
|
|
990 |
26958565 |
for (i = j = 1; i < out_learnt.size(); i++) { |
991 |
26657476 |
if (reason(var(out_learnt[i])) == CRef_Undef) { |
992 |
4539345 |
out_learnt[j++] = out_learnt[i]; |
993 |
|
} else { |
994 |
|
// Check if the literal is redundant |
995 |
22118131 |
if (!litRedundant(out_learnt[i], abstract_level)) { |
996 |
|
// Literal is not redundant |
997 |
19815079 |
out_learnt[j++] = out_learnt[i]; |
998 |
|
} else { |
999 |
2303052 |
if (needProof()) |
1000 |
|
{ |
1001 |
71778 |
Debug("newproof::sat") |
1002 |
35889 |
<< "Solver::analyze: redundant lit " |
1003 |
35889 |
<< toSatLiteral<Minisat::Solver>(out_learnt[i]) << "\n"; |
1004 |
35889 |
d_pfManager->addResolutionStep(out_learnt[i], true); |
1005 |
|
} |
1006 |
|
// Literal is redundant, to be safe, mark the level as current assertion level |
1007 |
|
// TODO: maybe optimize |
1008 |
2303052 |
max_resolution_level = std::max(max_resolution_level, user_level(var(out_learnt[i]))); |
1009 |
|
} |
1010 |
|
} |
1011 |
|
} |
1012 |
|
|
1013 |
|
}else if (ccmin_mode == 1){ |
1014 |
|
Unreachable(); |
1015 |
|
for (i = j = 1; i < out_learnt.size(); i++){ |
1016 |
|
Var x = var(out_learnt[i]); |
1017 |
|
|
1018 |
|
if (reason(x) == CRef_Undef) |
1019 |
|
out_learnt[j++] = out_learnt[i]; |
1020 |
|
else{ |
1021 |
|
Clause& c = ca[reason(var(out_learnt[i]))]; |
1022 |
|
for (int k = 1; k < c.size(); k++) |
1023 |
|
if (!seen[var(c[k])] && level(var(c[k])) > 0){ |
1024 |
|
out_learnt[j++] = out_learnt[i]; |
1025 |
|
break; } |
1026 |
|
} |
1027 |
|
} |
1028 |
|
}else |
1029 |
|
i = j = out_learnt.size(); |
1030 |
|
|
1031 |
301089 |
max_literals += out_learnt.size(); |
1032 |
301089 |
out_learnt.shrink(i - j); |
1033 |
301089 |
tot_literals += out_learnt.size(); |
1034 |
|
|
1035 |
|
// Find correct backtrack level: |
1036 |
|
// |
1037 |
301089 |
if (out_learnt.size() == 1) |
1038 |
6015 |
out_btlevel = 0; |
1039 |
|
else{ |
1040 |
295074 |
int max_i = 1; |
1041 |
|
// Find the first literal assigned at the next-highest level: |
1042 |
24354424 |
for (int k = 2; k < out_learnt.size(); k++) |
1043 |
24059350 |
if (level(var(out_learnt[k])) > level(var(out_learnt[max_i]))) |
1044 |
664647 |
max_i = k; |
1045 |
|
// Swap-in this literal at index 1: |
1046 |
295074 |
Lit p2 = out_learnt[max_i]; |
1047 |
295074 |
out_learnt[max_i] = out_learnt[1]; |
1048 |
295074 |
out_learnt[1] = p2; |
1049 |
295074 |
out_btlevel = level(var(p2)); |
1050 |
|
} |
1051 |
|
|
1052 |
29545375 |
for (int k = 0; k < analyze_toclear.size(); k++) |
1053 |
29244286 |
seen[var(analyze_toclear[k])] = 0; // ('seen[]' is now cleared) |
1054 |
|
|
1055 |
|
// Return the maximal resolution level |
1056 |
301089 |
return max_resolution_level; |
1057 |
|
} |
1058 |
|
|
1059 |
|
|
1060 |
|
// Check if 'p' can be removed. 'abstract_levels' is used to abort early if the algorithm is |
1061 |
|
// visiting literals at levels that cannot be removed later. |
1062 |
22118131 |
bool Solver::litRedundant(Lit p, uint32_t abstract_levels) |
1063 |
|
{ |
1064 |
22118131 |
analyze_stack.clear(); analyze_stack.push(p); |
1065 |
22118131 |
int top = analyze_toclear.size(); |
1066 |
59584309 |
while (analyze_stack.size() > 0){ |
1067 |
38548168 |
CRef c_reason = reason(var(analyze_stack.last())); |
1068 |
38548168 |
Assert(c_reason != CRef_Undef); |
1069 |
38548168 |
Clause& c = ca[c_reason]; |
1070 |
38548168 |
int c_size = c.size(); |
1071 |
38548168 |
analyze_stack.pop(); |
1072 |
|
|
1073 |
|
// Since calling reason might relocate to resize, c is not necesserily the right reference, we must |
1074 |
|
// use the allocator each time |
1075 |
148914652 |
for (int i = 1; i < c_size; i++){ |
1076 |
130181563 |
Lit p2 = ca[c_reason][i]; |
1077 |
130181563 |
if (!seen[var(p2)] && level(var(p2)) > 0) |
1078 |
|
{ |
1079 |
141672580 |
if (reason(var(p2)) != CRef_Undef |
1080 |
70836290 |
&& (abstractLevel(var(p2)) & abstract_levels) != 0) |
1081 |
|
{ |
1082 |
51021211 |
seen[var(p2)] = 1; |
1083 |
51021211 |
analyze_stack.push(p2); |
1084 |
51021211 |
analyze_toclear.push(p2); |
1085 |
|
} |
1086 |
|
else |
1087 |
|
{ |
1088 |
68550569 |
for (int j = top; j < analyze_toclear.size(); j++) |
1089 |
48735490 |
seen[var(analyze_toclear[j])] = 0; |
1090 |
19815079 |
analyze_toclear.shrink(analyze_toclear.size() - top); |
1091 |
19815079 |
return false; |
1092 |
|
} |
1093 |
|
} |
1094 |
|
} |
1095 |
|
} |
1096 |
|
|
1097 |
2303052 |
return true; |
1098 |
|
} |
1099 |
|
|
1100 |
|
|
1101 |
|
/*_________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
1102 |
|
| |
1103 |
|
| analyzeFinal : (p : Lit) -> [void] |
1104 |
|
| |
1105 |
|
| Description: |
1106 |
|
| Specialized analysis procedure to express the final conflict in terms of assumptions. |
1107 |
|
| Calculates the (possibly empty) set of assumptions that led to the assignment of 'p', and |
1108 |
|
| stores the result in 'out_conflict'. |
1109 |
|
|________________________________________________________________________________________________@*/ |
1110 |
2736 |
void Solver::analyzeFinal(Lit p, vec<Lit>& out_conflict) |
1111 |
|
{ |
1112 |
2736 |
out_conflict.clear(); |
1113 |
2736 |
out_conflict.push(p); |
1114 |
|
|
1115 |
2736 |
if (decisionLevel() == 0) |
1116 |
918 |
return; |
1117 |
|
|
1118 |
1818 |
seen[var(p)] = 1; |
1119 |
|
|
1120 |
133022 |
for (int i = trail.size()-1; i >= trail_lim[0]; i--){ |
1121 |
131204 |
Var x = var(trail[i]); |
1122 |
131204 |
if (seen[x]){ |
1123 |
28684 |
if (reason(x) == CRef_Undef){ |
1124 |
10592 |
Assert(level(x) > 0); |
1125 |
10592 |
out_conflict.push(~trail[i]); |
1126 |
|
}else{ |
1127 |
18092 |
Clause& c = ca[reason(x)]; |
1128 |
57635 |
for (int j = 1; j < c.size(); j++) |
1129 |
39543 |
if (level(var(c[j])) > 0) |
1130 |
38498 |
seen[var(c[j])] = 1; |
1131 |
|
} |
1132 |
28684 |
seen[x] = 0; |
1133 |
|
} |
1134 |
|
} |
1135 |
|
|
1136 |
1818 |
seen[var(p)] = 0; |
1137 |
|
} |
1138 |
|
|
1139 |
117403013 |
void Solver::uncheckedEnqueue(Lit p, CRef from) |
1140 |
|
{ |
1141 |
117403013 |
if (Debug.isOn("minisat")) |
1142 |
|
{ |
1143 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "unchecked enqueue of " << p << " (" |
1144 |
|
<< trail_index(var(p)) << ") trail size is " |
1145 |
|
<< trail.size() << " cap is " << trail.capacity() |
1146 |
|
<< ", reason is " << from << ", "; |
1147 |
|
if (from == CRef_Lazy) |
1148 |
|
{ |
1149 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "CRef_Lazy"; |
1150 |
|
} |
1151 |
|
else if (from == CRef_Undef) |
1152 |
|
{ |
1153 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "CRef_Undef"; |
1154 |
|
} |
1155 |
|
else |
1156 |
|
{ |
1157 |
|
for (unsigned i = 0, size = ca[from].size(); i < size; ++i) |
1158 |
|
{ |
1159 |
|
Debug("minisat") << ca[from][i] << " "; |
1160 |
|
} |
1161 |
|
} |
1162 |
|
Debug("minisat") << "\n"; |
1163 |
|
} |
1164 |
117403013 |
Assert(value(p) == l_Undef); |
1165 |
117403013 |
Assert(var(p) < nVars()); |
1166 |
117403013 |
assigns[var(p)] = lbool(!sign(p)); |
1167 |
117403013 |
vardata[var(p)] = VarData( |
1168 |
|
from, decisionLevel(), assertionLevel, intro_level(var(p)), trail.size()); |
1169 |
117403013 |
trail.push_(p); |
1170 |
117403013 |
if (theory[var(p)]) |
1171 |
|
{ |
1172 |
|
// Enqueue to the theory |
1173 |
17366042 |
d_proxy->enqueueTheoryLiteral(MinisatSatSolver::toSatLiteral(p)); |
1174 |
|
} |
1175 |
117403013 |
} |
1176 |
|
|
1177 |
3620808 |
CRef Solver::propagate(TheoryCheckType type) |
1178 |
|
{ |
1179 |
3620808 |
CRef confl = CRef_Undef; |
1180 |
3620808 |
recheck = false; |
1181 |
3620808 |
theoryConflict = false; |
1182 |
|
|
1183 |
7241616 |
ScopedBool scoped_bool(minisat_busy, true); |
1184 |
|
|
1185 |
|
// Add lemmas that we're left behind |
1186 |
3620808 |
if (lemmas.size() > 0) { |
1187 |
145 |
confl = updateLemmas(); |
1188 |
145 |
if (confl != CRef_Undef) { |
1189 |
|
return confl; |
1190 |
|
} |
1191 |
|
} |
1192 |
|
|
1193 |
|
// If this is the final check, no need for Boolean propagation and |
1194 |
|
// theory propagation |
1195 |
3620808 |
if (type == CHECK_FINAL) { |
1196 |
|
// Do the theory check |
1197 |
77242 |
theoryCheck(cvc5::theory::Theory::EFFORT_FULL); |
1198 |
|
// Pick up the theory propagated literals (there could be some, |
1199 |
|
// if new lemmas are added) |
1200 |
77231 |
propagateTheory(); |
1201 |
|
// If there are lemmas (or conflicts) update them |
1202 |
77231 |
if (lemmas.size() > 0) { |
1203 |
60653 |
recheck = true; |
1204 |
60653 |
confl = updateLemmas(); |
1205 |
60653 |
return confl; |
1206 |
|
} else { |
1207 |
16578 |
recheck = d_proxy->theoryNeedCheck(); |
1208 |
16578 |
return confl; |
1209 |
|
} |
1210 |
|
} |
1211 |
|
|
1212 |
|
// Keep running until we have checked everything, we |
1213 |
|
// have no conflict and no new literals have been asserted |
1214 |
953150 |
do { |
1215 |
|
// Propagate on the clauses |
1216 |
4496716 |
confl = propagateBool(); |
1217 |
|
// If no conflict, do the theory check |
1218 |
4496716 |
if (confl == CRef_Undef && type != CHECK_WITHOUT_THEORY) { |
1219 |
|
// Do the theory check |
1220 |
4115239 |
if (type == CHECK_FINAL_FAKE) { |
1221 |
|
theoryCheck(cvc5::theory::Theory::EFFORT_FULL); |
1222 |
|
} else { |
1223 |
4115239 |
theoryCheck(cvc5::theory::Theory::EFFORT_STANDARD); |
1224 |
|
} |
1225 |
|
// Pick up the theory propagated literals |
1226 |
4115236 |
propagateTheory(); |
1227 |
|
// If there are lemmas (or conflicts) update them |
1228 |
8230472 |
if (lemmas.size() > 0) { |
1229 |
202636 |
confl = updateLemmas(); |
1230 |
|
} |
1231 |
|
} else { |
1232 |
|
// if dumping decision tree, print the conflict |
1233 |
381477 |
if (Trace.isOn("dtview::conflict")) |
1234 |
|
{ |
1235 |
|
if (confl != CRef_Undef) |
1236 |
|
{ |
1237 |
|
dtviewPropConflictHelper(decisionLevel(), ca[confl], d_proxy); |
1238 |
|
} |
1239 |
|
} |
1240 |
|
// Even though in conflict, we still need to discharge the lemmas |
1241 |
381477 |
if (lemmas.size() > 0) { |
1242 |
|
// Remember the trail size |
1243 |
|
int oldLevel = decisionLevel(); |
1244 |
|
// Update the lemmas |
1245 |
|
CRef lemmaConflict = updateLemmas(); |
1246 |
|
// If we get a conflict, we prefer it since it's earlier in the trail |
1247 |
|
if (lemmaConflict != CRef_Undef) { |
1248 |
|
// Lemma conflict takes precedence, since it's earlier in the trail |
1249 |
|
confl = lemmaConflict; |
1250 |
|
} else { |
1251 |
|
// Otherwise, the Boolean conflict is canceled in the case we popped the trail |
1252 |
|
if (oldLevel > decisionLevel()) { |
1253 |
|
confl = CRef_Undef; |
1254 |
|
} |
1255 |
|
} |
1256 |
|
} |
1257 |
|
} |
1258 |
4496713 |
} while (confl == CRef_Undef && qhead < trail.size()); |
1259 |
3543563 |
return confl; |
1260 |
|
} |
1261 |
|
|
1262 |
4192467 |
void Solver::propagateTheory() { |
1263 |
8384934 |
SatClause propagatedLiteralsClause; |
1264 |
|
// Doesn't actually call propagate(); that's done in theoryCheck() now that combination |
1265 |
|
// is online. This just incorporates those propagations previously discovered. |
1266 |
4192467 |
d_proxy->theoryPropagate(propagatedLiteralsClause); |
1267 |
|
|
1268 |
8384934 |
vec<Lit> propagatedLiterals; |
1269 |
4192467 |
MinisatSatSolver::toMinisatClause(propagatedLiteralsClause, propagatedLiterals); |
1270 |
|
|
1271 |
4192467 |
int oldTrailSize = trail.size(); |
1272 |
4192467 |
Debug("minisat") << "old trail size is " << oldTrailSize << ", propagating " << propagatedLiterals.size() << " lits..." << std::endl; |
1273 |
11395678 |
for (unsigned i = 0, i_end = propagatedLiterals.size(); i < i_end; ++ i) { |
1274 |
7203211 |
Debug("minisat") << "Theory propagated: " << propagatedLiterals[i] << std::endl; |
1275 |
|
// multiple theories can propagate the same literal |
1276 |
7203211 |
Lit p = propagatedLiterals[i]; |
1277 |
7203211 |
if (value(p) == l_Undef) { |
1278 |
3654896 |
uncheckedEnqueue(p, CRef_Lazy); |
1279 |
|
} else { |
1280 |
3548315 |
if (value(p) == l_False) { |
1281 |
74488 |
Debug("minisat") << "Conflict in theory propagation" << std::endl; |
1282 |
148976 |
SatClause explanation_cl; |
1283 |
74488 |
d_proxy->explainPropagation(MinisatSatSolver::toSatLiteral(p), |
1284 |
|
explanation_cl); |
1285 |
148976 |
vec<Lit> explanation; |
1286 |
74488 |
MinisatSatSolver::toMinisatClause(explanation_cl, explanation); |
1287 |
|
ClauseId id; // FIXME: mark it as explanation here somehow? |
1288 |
74488 |
addClause(explanation, true, id); |
1289 |
|
} |
1290 |
|
} |
1291 |
|
} |
1292 |
4192467 |
} |
1293 |
|
|
1294 |
|
/*_________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
1295 |
|
| |
1296 |
|
| theoryCheck: [void] -> [Clause*] |
1297 |
|
| |
1298 |
|
| Description: |
1299 |
|
| Checks all enqueued theory facts for satisfiability. If a conflict arises, the conflicting |
1300 |
|
| clause is returned, otherwise NULL. |
1301 |
|
| |
1302 |
|
| Note: the propagation queue might be NOT empty |
1303 |
|
|________________________________________________________________________________________________@*/ |
1304 |
4192481 |
void Solver::theoryCheck(cvc5::theory::Theory::Effort effort) |
1305 |
|
{ |
1306 |
4192481 |
d_proxy->theoryCheck(effort); |
1307 |
4192467 |
} |
1308 |
|
|
1309 |
|
/*_________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
1310 |
|
| |
1311 |
|
| propagateBool : [void] -> [Clause*] |
1312 |
|
| |
1313 |
|
| Description: |
1314 |
|
| Propagates all enqueued facts. If a conflict arises, the conflicting clause is returned, |
1315 |
|
| otherwise CRef_Undef. |
1316 |
|
| |
1317 |
|
| Post-conditions: |
1318 |
|
| * the propagation queue is empty, even if there was a conflict. |
1319 |
|
|________________________________________________________________________________________________@*/ |
1320 |
4496716 |
CRef Solver::propagateBool() |
1321 |
|
{ |
1322 |
4496716 |
CRef confl = CRef_Undef; |
1323 |
4496716 |
int num_props = 0; |
1324 |
4496716 |
watches.cleanAll(); |
1325 |
|
|
1326 |
227831468 |
while (qhead < trail.size()){ |
1327 |
111667376 |
Lit p = trail[qhead++]; // 'p' is enqueued fact to propagate. |
1328 |
111667376 |
vec<Watcher>& ws = watches[p]; |
1329 |
|
Watcher *i, *j, *end; |
1330 |
111667376 |
num_props++; |
1331 |
|
|
1332 |
|
// if propagation tracing enabled, print boolean propagation |
1333 |
111667376 |
if (Trace.isOn("dtview::prop")) |
1334 |
|
{ |
1335 |
|
dtviewBoolPropagationHelper(decisionLevel(), p, d_proxy); |
1336 |
|
} |
1337 |
|
|
1338 |
911743350 |
for (i = j = (Watcher*)ws, end = i + ws.size(); i != end;){ |
1339 |
|
// Try to avoid inspecting the clause: |
1340 |
800075974 |
Lit blocker = i->blocker; |
1341 |
1302195207 |
if (value(blocker) == l_True){ |
1342 |
1532266465 |
*j++ = *i++; continue; } |
1343 |
|
|
1344 |
|
// Make sure the false literal is data[1]: |
1345 |
297956741 |
CRef cr = i->cref; |
1346 |
297956741 |
Clause& c = ca[cr]; |
1347 |
297956741 |
Lit false_lit = ~p; |
1348 |
297956741 |
if (c[0] == false_lit) |
1349 |
85583448 |
c[0] = c[1], c[1] = false_lit; |
1350 |
297956741 |
Assert(c[1] == false_lit); |
1351 |
297956741 |
i++; |
1352 |
|
|
1353 |
|
// If 0th watch is true, then clause is already satisfied. |
1354 |
297956741 |
Lit first = c[0]; |
1355 |
297956741 |
Watcher w = Watcher(cr, first); |
1356 |
323865507 |
if (first != blocker && value(first) == l_True){ |
1357 |
51817532 |
*j++ = w; continue; } |
1358 |
|
|
1359 |
|
// Look for new watch: |
1360 |
272047975 |
Assert(c.size() >= 2); |
1361 |
1258008426 |
for (int k = 2; k < c.size(); k++) |
1362 |
1147743283 |
if (value(c[k]) != l_False){ |
1363 |
161782832 |
c[1] = c[k]; c[k] = false_lit; |
1364 |
161782832 |
watches[~c[1]].push(w); |
1365 |
161782832 |
goto NextClause; } |
1366 |
|
|
1367 |
|
// Did not find watch -- clause is unit under assignment: |
1368 |
110265143 |
*j++ = w; |
1369 |
110265143 |
if (value(first) == l_False){ |
1370 |
246990 |
confl = cr; |
1371 |
246990 |
qhead = trail.size(); |
1372 |
|
// Copy the remaining watches: |
1373 |
6041052 |
while (i < end) |
1374 |
2897031 |
*j++ = *i++; |
1375 |
|
}else |
1376 |
110018153 |
uncheckedEnqueue(first, cr); |
1377 |
|
|
1378 |
272047975 |
NextClause:; |
1379 |
|
} |
1380 |
111667376 |
ws.shrink(i - j); |
1381 |
|
} |
1382 |
4496716 |
propagations += num_props; |
1383 |
4496716 |
simpDB_props -= num_props; |
1384 |
|
|
1385 |
4496716 |
return confl; |
1386 |
|
} |
1387 |
|
|
1388 |
|
|
1389 |
|
/*_________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
1390 |
|
| |
1391 |
|
| reduceDB : () -> [void] |
1392 |
|
| |
1393 |
|
| Description: |
1394 |
|
| Remove half of the learnt clauses, minus the clauses locked by the current assignment. Locked |
1395 |
|
| clauses are clauses that are reason to some assignment. Binary clauses are never removed. |
1396 |
|
|________________________________________________________________________________________________@*/ |
1397 |
|
struct reduceDB_lt { |
1398 |
|
ClauseAllocator& ca; |
1399 |
4045 |
reduceDB_lt(ClauseAllocator& ca_) : ca(ca_) {} |
1400 |
5488405 |
bool operator () (CRef x, CRef y) { |
1401 |
5488405 |
return ca[x].size() > 2 && (ca[y].size() == 2 || ca[x].activity() < ca[y].activity()); } |
1402 |
|
}; |
1403 |
4045 |
void Solver::reduceDB() |
1404 |
|
{ |
1405 |
|
int i, j; |
1406 |
4045 |
double extra_lim = cla_inc / clauses_removable.size(); // Remove any clause below this activity |
1407 |
|
|
1408 |
4045 |
sort(clauses_removable, reduceDB_lt(ca)); |
1409 |
|
// Don't delete binary or locked clauses. From the rest, delete clauses from the first half |
1410 |
|
// and clauses with activity smaller than 'extra_lim': |
1411 |
520257 |
for (i = j = 0; i < clauses_removable.size(); i++){ |
1412 |
516212 |
Clause& c = ca[clauses_removable[i]]; |
1413 |
516212 |
if (c.size() > 2 && !locked(c) && (i < clauses_removable.size() / 2 || c.activity() < extra_lim)) |
1414 |
212396 |
removeClause(clauses_removable[i]); |
1415 |
|
else |
1416 |
303816 |
clauses_removable[j++] = clauses_removable[i]; |
1417 |
|
} |
1418 |
4045 |
clauses_removable.shrink(i - j); |
1419 |
4045 |
checkGarbage(); |
1420 |
4045 |
} |
1421 |
|
|
1422 |
|
|
1423 |
18263 |
void Solver::removeSatisfied(vec<CRef>& cs) |
1424 |
|
{ |
1425 |
|
int i, j; |
1426 |
487283 |
for (i = j = 0; i < cs.size(); i++){ |
1427 |
469020 |
Clause& c = ca[cs[i]]; |
1428 |
469020 |
if (satisfied(c)) { |
1429 |
45217 |
removeClause(cs[i]); |
1430 |
|
} |
1431 |
|
else |
1432 |
|
{ |
1433 |
423803 |
cs[j++] = cs[i]; |
1434 |
|
} |
1435 |
|
} |
1436 |
18263 |
cs.shrink(i - j); |
1437 |
18263 |
} |
1438 |
|
|
1439 |
9738 |
void Solver::removeClausesAboveLevel(vec<CRef>& cs, int level) |
1440 |
|
{ |
1441 |
|
int i, j; |
1442 |
836967 |
for (i = j = 0; i < cs.size(); i++){ |
1443 |
827229 |
Clause& c = ca[cs[i]]; |
1444 |
827229 |
if (c.level() > level) { |
1445 |
250297 |
Assert(!locked(c)); |
1446 |
250297 |
removeClause(cs[i]); |
1447 |
|
} else { |
1448 |
576932 |
cs[j++] = cs[i]; |
1449 |
|
} |
1450 |
|
} |
1451 |
9738 |
cs.shrink(i - j); |
1452 |
9738 |
} |
1453 |
|
|
1454 |
18263 |
void Solver::rebuildOrderHeap() |
1455 |
|
{ |
1456 |
36526 |
vec<Var> vs; |
1457 |
2936413 |
for (Var v = 0; v < nVars(); v++) |
1458 |
2918150 |
if (decision[v] && value(v) == l_Undef) |
1459 |
2227138 |
vs.push(v); |
1460 |
18263 |
order_heap.build(vs); |
1461 |
18263 |
} |
1462 |
|
|
1463 |
|
|
1464 |
|
/*_________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
1465 |
|
| |
1466 |
|
| simplify : [void] -> [bool] |
1467 |
|
| |
1468 |
|
| Description: |
1469 |
|
| Simplify the clause database according to the current top-level assigment. Currently, the only |
1470 |
|
| thing done here is the removal of satisfied clauses, but more things can be put here. |
1471 |
|
|________________________________________________________________________________________________@*/ |
1472 |
45907 |
bool Solver::simplify() |
1473 |
|
{ |
1474 |
45907 |
Assert(decisionLevel() == 0); |
1475 |
|
|
1476 |
45907 |
if (!ok || propagate(CHECK_WITHOUT_THEORY) != CRef_Undef) return ok = false; |
1477 |
|
|
1478 |
45670 |
if (nAssigns() == simpDB_assigns || (simpDB_props > 0)) return true; |
1479 |
|
|
1480 |
|
// Remove satisfied clauses: |
1481 |
18263 |
removeSatisfied(clauses_removable); |
1482 |
18263 |
if (remove_satisfied) // Can be turned off. |
1483 |
|
removeSatisfied(clauses_persistent); |
1484 |
18263 |
checkGarbage(); |
1485 |
18263 |
rebuildOrderHeap(); |
1486 |
|
|
1487 |
18263 |
simpDB_assigns = nAssigns(); |
1488 |
18263 |
simpDB_props = |
1489 |
18263 |
clauses_literals + learnts_literals; // (shouldn't depend on stats |
1490 |
|
// really, but it will do for now) |
1491 |
|
|
1492 |
18263 |
return true; |
1493 |
|
} |
1494 |
|
|
1495 |
|
|
1496 |
|
/*_________________________________________________________________________________________________ |
1497 |
|
| |
1498 |
|
| search : (nof_conflicts : int) (params : const SearchParams&) -> [lbool] |
1499 |
|
| |
1500 |
|
| Description: |
1501 |
|
| Search for a model the specified number of conflicts. |
1502 |
|
| NOTE! Use negative value for 'nof_conflicts' indicate infinity. |
1503 |
|
| |
1504 |
|
| Output: |
1505 |
|
| 'l_True' if a partial assigment that is consistent with respect to the clauseset is found. If |
1506 |
|
| all variables are decision variables, this means that the clause set is satisfiable. 'l_False' |
1507 |
|
| if the clause set is unsatisfiable. 'l_Undef' if the bound on number of conflicts is reached. |
1508 |
|
|________________________________________________________________________________________________@*/ |
1509 |
16293 |
lbool Solver::search(int nof_conflicts) |
1510 |
|
{ |
1511 |
16293 |
Assert(ok); |
1512 |
|
int backtrack_level; |
1513 |
16293 |
int conflictC = 0; |
1514 |
32586 |
vec<Lit> learnt_clause; |
1515 |
16293 |
starts++; |
1516 |
|
|
1517 |
16293 |
TheoryCheckType check_type = CHECK_WITH_THEORY; |
1518 |
|
for (;;) |
1519 |
|
{ |
1520 |
|
// Propagate and call the theory solvers |
1521 |
3486280 |
CRef confl = propagate(check_type); |
1522 |
3486266 |
Assert(lemmas.size() == 0); |
1523 |
|
|
1524 |
3486266 |
if (confl != CRef_Undef) |
1525 |
|
{ |
1526 |
304485 |
conflicts++; |
1527 |
304485 |
conflictC++; |
1528 |
|
|
1529 |
304485 |
if (decisionLevel() == 0) |
1530 |
|
{ |
1531 |
3396 |
if (needProof()) |
1532 |
|
{ |
1533 |
859 |
if (confl == CRef_Lazy) |
1534 |
|
{ |
1535 |
48 |
d_pfManager->finalizeProof(); |
1536 |
|
} |
1537 |
|
else |
1538 |
|
{ |
1539 |
811 |
d_pfManager->finalizeProof(ca[confl]); |
1540 |
|
} |
1541 |
|
} |
1542 |
3396 |
return l_False; |
1543 |
|
} |
1544 |
|
|
1545 |
|
// Analyze the conflict |
1546 |
301089 |
learnt_clause.clear(); |
1547 |
301089 |
int max_level = analyze(confl, learnt_clause, backtrack_level); |
1548 |
301089 |
cancelUntil(backtrack_level); |
1549 |
|
|
1550 |
|
// Assert the conflict clause and the asserting literal |
1551 |
301089 |
if (learnt_clause.size() == 1) |
1552 |
|
{ |
1553 |
6015 |
uncheckedEnqueue(learnt_clause[0]); |
1554 |
6015 |
if (needProof()) |
1555 |
|
{ |
1556 |
1544 |
d_pfManager->endResChain(learnt_clause[0]); |
1557 |
|
} |
1558 |
|
} |
1559 |
|
else |
1560 |
|
{ |
1561 |
295074 |
CRef cr = ca.alloc(assertionLevelOnly() ? assertionLevel : max_level, |
1562 |
|
learnt_clause, |
1563 |
295074 |
true); |
1564 |
295074 |
clauses_removable.push(cr); |
1565 |
295074 |
attachClause(cr); |
1566 |
295074 |
claBumpActivity(ca[cr]); |
1567 |
295074 |
uncheckedEnqueue(learnt_clause[0], cr); |
1568 |
295074 |
if (needProof()) |
1569 |
|
{ |
1570 |
21022 |
d_pfManager->endResChain(ca[cr]); |
1571 |
|
} |
1572 |
|
} |
1573 |
|
|
1574 |
301089 |
varDecayActivity(); |
1575 |
301089 |
claDecayActivity(); |
1576 |
|
|
1577 |
301089 |
if (--learntsize_adjust_cnt == 0) |
1578 |
|
{ |
1579 |
567 |
learntsize_adjust_confl *= learntsize_adjust_inc; |
1580 |
567 |
learntsize_adjust_cnt = (int)learntsize_adjust_confl; |
1581 |
567 |
max_learnts *= learntsize_inc; |
1582 |
|
|
1583 |
567 |
if (verbosity >= 1) |
1584 |
|
printf("| %9d | %7d %8d %8d | %8d %8d %6.0f | %6.3f %% |\n", |
1585 |
|
(int)conflicts, |
1586 |
|
(int)dec_vars |
1587 |
|
- (trail_lim.size() == 0 ? trail.size() : trail_lim[0]), |
1588 |
|
nClauses(), |
1589 |
|
(int)clauses_literals, |
1590 |
|
(int)max_learnts, |
1591 |
|
nLearnts(), |
1592 |
|
(double)learnts_literals / nLearnts(), |
1593 |
|
progressEstimate() * 100); |
1594 |
|
} |
1595 |
|
|
1596 |
301089 |
if (theoryConflict && options::sat_refine_conflicts()) |
1597 |
|
{ |
1598 |
|
check_type = CHECK_FINAL_FAKE; |
1599 |
|
} |
1600 |
|
else |
1601 |
|
{ |
1602 |
301089 |
check_type = CHECK_WITH_THEORY; |
1603 |
|
} |
1604 |
|
} |
1605 |
|
else |
1606 |
|
{ |
1607 |
|
// If this was a final check, we are satisfiable |
1608 |
3181781 |
if (check_type == CHECK_FINAL) |
1609 |
|
{ |
1610 |
|
// Note that we are done making decisions when there are no pending decisions |
1611 |
|
// on assumptions, and the decision engine indicates it is done. |
1612 |
67744 |
bool decisionEngineDone = (decisionLevel() >= assumptions.size()) |
1613 |
67744 |
&& d_proxy->isDecisionEngineDone(); |
1614 |
|
// Unless a lemma has added more stuff to the queues |
1615 |
189566 |
if (!decisionEngineDone |
1616 |
67744 |
&& (!order_heap.empty() || qhead < trail.size())) |
1617 |
|
{ |
1618 |
54078 |
check_type = CHECK_WITH_THEORY; |
1619 |
185398 |
continue; |
1620 |
|
} |
1621 |
13666 |
else if (recheck) |
1622 |
|
{ |
1623 |
|
// There some additional stuff added, so we go for another |
1624 |
|
// full-check |
1625 |
6188 |
continue; |
1626 |
|
} |
1627 |
|
else |
1628 |
|
{ |
1629 |
|
// Yes, we're truly satisfiable |
1630 |
7478 |
return l_True; |
1631 |
|
} |
1632 |
|
} |
1633 |
3114037 |
else if (check_type == CHECK_FINAL_FAKE) |
1634 |
|
{ |
1635 |
|
check_type = CHECK_WITH_THEORY; |
1636 |
|
} |
1637 |
|
|
1638 |
6228074 |
if ((nof_conflicts >= 0 && conflictC >= nof_conflicts) |
1639 |
6225407 |
|| !withinBudget(Resource::SatConflictStep)) |
1640 |
|
{ |
1641 |
|
// Reached bound on number of conflicts: |
1642 |
2667 |
progress_estimate = progressEstimate(); |
1643 |
2667 |
cancelUntil(0); |
1644 |
|
// [mdeters] notify theory engine of restarts for deferred |
1645 |
|
// theory processing |
1646 |
2667 |
d_proxy->notifyRestart(); |
1647 |
2667 |
return l_Undef; |
1648 |
|
} |
1649 |
|
|
1650 |
|
// Simplify the set of problem clauses: |
1651 |
3111370 |
if (decisionLevel() == 0 && !simplify()) |
1652 |
|
{ |
1653 |
|
return l_False; |
1654 |
|
} |
1655 |
|
|
1656 |
3111370 |
if (clauses_removable.size() - nAssigns() >= max_learnts) |
1657 |
|
{ |
1658 |
|
// Reduce the set of learnt clauses: |
1659 |
4045 |
reduceDB(); |
1660 |
|
} |
1661 |
|
|
1662 |
3111370 |
Lit next = lit_Undef; |
1663 |
3170540 |
while (decisionLevel() < assumptions.size()) |
1664 |
|
{ |
1665 |
|
// Perform user provided assumption: |
1666 |
351716 |
Lit p = assumptions[decisionLevel()]; |
1667 |
351716 |
if (value(p) == l_True) |
1668 |
|
{ |
1669 |
|
// Dummy decision level: |
1670 |
29585 |
newDecisionLevel(); |
1671 |
|
} |
1672 |
322131 |
else if (value(p) == l_False) |
1673 |
|
{ |
1674 |
2736 |
analyzeFinal(~p, d_conflict); |
1675 |
2736 |
return l_False; |
1676 |
|
} |
1677 |
|
else |
1678 |
|
{ |
1679 |
319395 |
next = p; |
1680 |
319395 |
break; |
1681 |
|
} |
1682 |
|
} |
1683 |
|
|
1684 |
3108634 |
if (next == lit_Undef) |
1685 |
|
{ |
1686 |
|
// New variable decision: |
1687 |
2789239 |
next = pickBranchLit(); |
1688 |
|
|
1689 |
2860291 |
if (next == lit_Undef) |
1690 |
|
{ |
1691 |
|
// We need to do a full theory check to confirm |
1692 |
142108 |
Debug("minisat::search") |
1693 |
71054 |
<< "Doing a full theory check..." << std::endl; |
1694 |
71054 |
check_type = CHECK_FINAL; |
1695 |
71054 |
continue; |
1696 |
|
} |
1697 |
|
} |
1698 |
|
|
1699 |
|
// Increase decision level and enqueue 'next' |
1700 |
3037578 |
newDecisionLevel(); |
1701 |
3037578 |
uncheckedEnqueue(next); |
1702 |
|
} |
1703 |
3469987 |
} |
1704 |
|
} |
1705 |
|
|
1706 |
|
|
1707 |
2667 |
double Solver::progressEstimate() const |
1708 |
|
{ |
1709 |
2667 |
double progress = 0; |
1710 |
2667 |
double F = 1.0 / nVars(); |
1711 |
|
|
1712 |
191939 |
for (int i = 0; i <= decisionLevel(); i++){ |
1713 |
189272 |
int beg = i == 0 ? 0 : trail_lim[i - 1]; |
1714 |
189272 |
int end = i == decisionLevel() ? trail.size() : trail_lim[i]; |
1715 |
189272 |
progress += pow(F, i) * (end - beg); |
1716 |
|
} |
1717 |
|
|
1718 |
2667 |
return progress / nVars(); |
1719 |
|
} |
1720 |
|
|
1721 |
|
/* |
1722 |
|
Finite subsequences of the Luby-sequence: |
1723 |
|
|
1724 |
|
0: 1 |
1725 |
|
1: 1 1 2 |
1726 |
|
2: 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 |
1727 |
|
3: 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 8 |
1728 |
|
... |
1729 |
|
|
1730 |
|
|
1731 |
|
*/ |
1732 |
|
|
1733 |
16293 |
static double luby(double y, int x){ |
1734 |
|
|
1735 |
|
// Find the finite subsequence that contains index 'x', and the |
1736 |
|
// size of that subsequence: |
1737 |
|
int size, seq; |
1738 |
16293 |
for (size = 1, seq = 0; size < x+1; seq++, size = 2*size+1); |
1739 |
|
|
1740 |
27853 |
while (size-1 != x){ |
1741 |
5780 |
size = (size-1)>>1; |
1742 |
5780 |
seq--; |
1743 |
5780 |
x = x % size; |
1744 |
|
} |
1745 |
|
|
1746 |
16293 |
return pow(y, seq); |
1747 |
|
} |
1748 |
|
|
1749 |
|
// NOTE: assumptions passed in member-variable 'assumptions'. |
1750 |
14994 |
lbool Solver::solve_() |
1751 |
|
{ |
1752 |
14994 |
Debug("minisat") << "nvars = " << nVars() << std::endl; |
1753 |
|
|
1754 |
29988 |
ScopedBool scoped_bool(minisat_busy, true); |
1755 |
|
|
1756 |
14994 |
Assert(decisionLevel() == 0); |
1757 |
|
|
1758 |
14994 |
model.clear(); |
1759 |
14994 |
d_conflict.clear(); |
1760 |
14994 |
if (!ok){ |
1761 |
1368 |
minisat_busy = false; |
1762 |
1368 |
return l_False; |
1763 |
|
} |
1764 |
|
|
1765 |
13626 |
solves++; |
1766 |
|
|
1767 |
13626 |
max_learnts = nClauses() * learntsize_factor; |
1768 |
13626 |
learntsize_adjust_confl = learntsize_adjust_start_confl; |
1769 |
13626 |
learntsize_adjust_cnt = (int)learntsize_adjust_confl; |
1770 |
13626 |
lbool status = l_Undef; |
1771 |
|
|
1772 |
13626 |
if (verbosity >= 1){ |
1773 |
1 |
printf("============================[ Search Statistics ]==============================\n"); |
1774 |
1 |
printf("| Conflicts | ORIGINAL | LEARNT | Progress |\n"); |
1775 |
1 |
printf("| | Vars Clauses Literals | Limit Clauses Lit/Cl | |\n"); |
1776 |
1 |
printf("===============================================================================\n"); |
1777 |
|
} |
1778 |
|
|
1779 |
|
// Search: |
1780 |
13626 |
int curr_restarts = 0; |
1781 |
46180 |
while (status == l_Undef){ |
1782 |
16293 |
double rest_base = luby_restart ? luby(restart_inc, curr_restarts) : pow(restart_inc, curr_restarts); |
1783 |
16293 |
status = search(rest_base * restart_first); |
1784 |
16277 |
if (!withinBudget(Resource::SatConflictStep)) |
1785 |
|
break; // FIXME add restart option? |
1786 |
16277 |
curr_restarts++; |
1787 |
|
} |
1788 |
|
|
1789 |
13610 |
if (!withinBudget(Resource::SatConflictStep)) |
1790 |
|
status = l_Undef; |
1791 |
|
|
1792 |
13610 |
if (verbosity >= 1) |
1793 |
1 |
printf("===============================================================================\n"); |
1794 |
|
|
1795 |
|
|
1796 |
13610 |
if (status == l_True){ |
1797 |
|
// Extend & copy model: |
1798 |
7478 |
model.growTo(nVars()); |
1799 |
624372 |
for (int i = 0; i < nVars(); i++) { |
1800 |
616894 |
model[i] = value(i); |
1801 |
616894 |
Debug("minisat") << i << " = " << model[i] << std::endl; |
1802 |
|
} |
1803 |
|
} |
1804 |
6132 |
else if (status == l_False && d_conflict.size() == 0) |
1805 |
3396 |
ok = false; |
1806 |
|
|
1807 |
13610 |
return status; |
1808 |
|
} |
1809 |
|
|
1810 |
|
//================================================================================================= |
1811 |
|
// Writing CNF to DIMACS: |
1812 |
|
// |
1813 |
|
// FIXME: this needs to be rewritten completely. |
1814 |
|
|
1815 |
|
static Var mapVar(Var x, vec<Var>& map, Var& max) |
1816 |
|
{ |
1817 |
|
if (map.size() <= x || map[x] == -1){ |
1818 |
|
map.growTo(x+1, -1); |
1819 |
|
map[x] = max++; |
1820 |
|
} |
1821 |
|
return map[x]; |
1822 |
|
} |
1823 |
|
|
1824 |
|
|
1825 |
|
void Solver::toDimacs(FILE* f, Clause& c, vec<Var>& map, Var& max) |
1826 |
|
{ |
1827 |
|
if (satisfied(c)) return; |
1828 |
|
|
1829 |
|
for (int i = 0; i < c.size(); i++) |
1830 |
|
if (value(c[i]) != l_False) |
1831 |
|
fprintf(f, "%s%d ", sign(c[i]) ? "-" : "", mapVar(var(c[i]), map, max)+1); |
1832 |
|
fprintf(f, "0\n"); |
1833 |
|
} |
1834 |
|
|
1835 |
|
|
1836 |
|
void Solver::toDimacs(const char *file, const vec<Lit>& assumps) |
1837 |
|
{ |
1838 |
|
FILE* f = fopen(file, "wr"); |
1839 |
|
if (f == NULL) |
1840 |
|
fprintf(stderr, "could not open file %s\n", file), exit(1); |
1841 |
|
toDimacs(f, assumps); |
1842 |
|
fclose(f); |
1843 |
|
} |
1844 |
|
|
1845 |
|
|
1846 |
|
void Solver::toDimacs(FILE* f, const vec<Lit>& assumps) |
1847 |
|
{ |
1848 |
|
// Handle case when solver is in contradictory state: |
1849 |
|
if (!ok){ |
1850 |
|
fprintf(f, "p cnf 1 2\n1 0\n-1 0\n"); |
1851 |
|
return; } |
1852 |
|
|
1853 |
|
vec<Var> map; Var max = 0; |
1854 |
|
|
1855 |
|
// Cannot use removeClauses here because it is not safe |
1856 |
|
// to deallocate them at this point. Could be improved. |
1857 |
|
int cnt = 0; |
1858 |
|
for (int i = 0; i < clauses_persistent.size(); i++) |
1859 |
|
if (!satisfied(ca[clauses_persistent[i]])) |
1860 |
|
cnt++; |
1861 |
|
|
1862 |
|
for (int i = 0; i < clauses_persistent.size(); i++) |
1863 |
|
if (!satisfied(ca[clauses_persistent[i]])){ |
1864 |
|
Clause& c = ca[clauses_persistent[i]]; |
1865 |
|
for (int j = 0; j < c.size(); j++) |
1866 |
|
if (value(c[j]) != l_False) |
1867 |
|
mapVar(var(c[j]), map, max); |
1868 |
|
} |
1869 |
|
|
1870 |
|
// Assumptions are added as unit clauses: |
1871 |
|
cnt += assumptions.size(); |
1872 |
|
|
1873 |
|
fprintf(f, "p cnf %d %d\n", max, cnt); |
1874 |
|
|
1875 |
|
for (int i = 0; i < assumptions.size(); i++){ |
1876 |
|
Assert(value(assumptions[i]) != l_False); |
1877 |
|
fprintf(f, |
1878 |
|
"%s%d 0\n", |
1879 |
|
sign(assumptions[i]) ? "-" : "", |
1880 |
|
mapVar(var(assumptions[i]), map, max) + 1); |
1881 |
|
} |
1882 |
|
|
1883 |
|
for (int i = 0; i < clauses_persistent.size(); i++) |
1884 |
|
toDimacs(f, ca[clauses_persistent[i]], map, max); |
1885 |
|
|
1886 |
|
if (verbosity > 0) |
1887 |
|
printf("Wrote %d clauses with %d variables.\n", cnt, max); |
1888 |
|
} |
1889 |
|
|
1890 |
|
|
1891 |
|
//================================================================================================= |
1892 |
|
// Garbage Collection methods: |
1893 |
|
|
1894 |
2897 |
void Solver::relocAll(ClauseAllocator& to) |
1895 |
|
{ |
1896 |
|
// All watchers: |
1897 |
|
// |
1898 |
|
// for (int i = 0; i < watches.size(); i++) |
1899 |
2897 |
watches.cleanAll(); |
1900 |
927226 |
for (int v = 0; v < nVars(); v++) |
1901 |
2772987 |
for (int s = 0; s < 2; s++){ |
1902 |
1848658 |
Lit p = mkLit(v, s); |
1903 |
|
// printf(" >>> RELOCING: %s%d\n", sign(p)?"-":"", var(p)+1); |
1904 |
1848658 |
vec<Watcher>& ws = watches[p]; |
1905 |
5724156 |
for (int j = 0; j < ws.size(); j++) |
1906 |
|
{ |
1907 |
3875498 |
ca.reloc(ws[j].cref, to); |
1908 |
|
} |
1909 |
|
} |
1910 |
|
|
1911 |
|
// All reasons: |
1912 |
|
// |
1913 |
200730 |
for (int i = 0; i < trail.size(); i++){ |
1914 |
197833 |
Var v = var(trail[i]); |
1915 |
|
|
1916 |
395666 |
if (hasReasonClause(v) |
1917 |
197833 |
&& (ca[reason(v)].reloced() || locked(ca[reason(v)]))) |
1918 |
|
{ |
1919 |
46718 |
ca.reloc(vardata[v].d_reason, to); |
1920 |
|
} |
1921 |
|
} |
1922 |
|
// All learnt: |
1923 |
|
// |
1924 |
200755 |
for (int i = 0; i < clauses_removable.size(); i++) |
1925 |
|
{ |
1926 |
197858 |
ca.reloc(clauses_removable[i], to); |
1927 |
|
} |
1928 |
|
// All original: |
1929 |
|
// |
1930 |
1742788 |
for (int i = 0; i < clauses_persistent.size(); i++) |
1931 |
|
{ |
1932 |
1739891 |
ca.reloc(clauses_persistent[i], to); |
1933 |
|
} |
1934 |
2897 |
} |
1935 |
|
|
1936 |
|
|
1937 |
|
void Solver::garbageCollect() |
1938 |
|
{ |
1939 |
|
// Initialize the next region to a size corresponding to the estimated utilization degree. This |
1940 |
|
// is not precise but should avoid some unnecessary reallocations for the new region: |
1941 |
|
ClauseAllocator to(ca.size() - ca.wasted()); |
1942 |
|
|
1943 |
|
relocAll(to); |
1944 |
|
if (verbosity >= 2) |
1945 |
|
printf("| Garbage collection: %12d bytes => %12d bytes |\n", |
1946 |
|
ca.size()*ClauseAllocator::Unit_Size, to.size()*ClauseAllocator::Unit_Size); |
1947 |
|
to.moveTo(ca); |
1948 |
|
} |
1949 |
|
|
1950 |
4869 |
void Solver::push() |
1951 |
|
{ |
1952 |
4869 |
Assert(d_enable_incremental); |
1953 |
4869 |
Assert(decisionLevel() == 0); |
1954 |
|
|
1955 |
4869 |
++assertionLevel; |
1956 |
4869 |
Debug("minisat") << "in user push, increasing assertion level to " << assertionLevel << std::endl; |
1957 |
4869 |
trail_ok.push(ok); |
1958 |
4869 |
assigns_lim.push(assigns.size()); |
1959 |
|
|
1960 |
4869 |
d_context->push(); // SAT context for cvc5 |
1961 |
|
|
1962 |
4869 |
Debug("minisat") << "MINISAT PUSH assertionLevel is " << assertionLevel << ", trail.size is " << trail.size() << std::endl; |
1963 |
4869 |
} |
1964 |
|
|
1965 |
4869 |
void Solver::pop() |
1966 |
|
{ |
1967 |
4869 |
Assert(d_enable_incremental); |
1968 |
|
|
1969 |
4869 |
Assert(decisionLevel() == 0); |
1970 |
|
|
1971 |
|
// Pop the trail below the user level |
1972 |
4869 |
--assertionLevel; |
1973 |
9738 |
Debug("minisat") << "in user pop, decreasing assertion level to " |
1974 |
4869 |
<< assertionLevel << "\n" |
1975 |
4869 |
<< cvc5::push; |
1976 |
|
while (true) { |
1977 |
57159 |
Debug("minisat") << "== unassigning " << trail.last() << std::endl; |
1978 |
57159 |
Var x = var(trail.last()); |
1979 |
57159 |
if (user_level(x) > assertionLevel) { |
1980 |
52290 |
assigns[x] = l_Undef; |
1981 |
52290 |
vardata[x] = VarData(CRef_Undef, -1, -1, intro_level(x), -1); |
1982 |
52290 |
if(phase_saving >= 1 && (polarity[x] & 0x2) == 0) |
1983 |
51164 |
polarity[x] = sign(trail.last()); |
1984 |
52290 |
insertVarOrder(x); |
1985 |
52290 |
trail.pop(); |
1986 |
|
} else { |
1987 |
4869 |
break; |
1988 |
|
} |
1989 |
52290 |
} |
1990 |
|
|
1991 |
|
// The head should be at the trail top |
1992 |
4869 |
qhead = trail.size(); |
1993 |
|
|
1994 |
|
// Remove the clauses |
1995 |
4869 |
removeClausesAboveLevel(clauses_persistent, assertionLevel); |
1996 |
4869 |
removeClausesAboveLevel(clauses_removable, assertionLevel); |
1997 |
4869 |
Debug("minisat") << cvc5::pop; |
1998 |
|
// Pop the SAT context to notify everyone |
1999 |
4869 |
d_context->pop(); // SAT context for cvc5 |
2000 |
|
|
2001 |
9738 |
Debug("minisat") << "MINISAT POP assertionLevel is " << assertionLevel |
2002 |
4869 |
<< ", trail.size is " << trail.size() << "\n"; |
2003 |
|
// Pop the created variables |
2004 |
4869 |
resizeVars(assigns_lim.last()); |
2005 |
4869 |
assigns_lim.pop(); |
2006 |
4869 |
variables_to_register.clear(); |
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
// Pop the OK |
2009 |
4869 |
ok = trail_ok.last(); |
2010 |
4869 |
trail_ok.pop(); |
2011 |
4869 |
} |
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
263434 |
CRef Solver::updateLemmas() { |
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
263434 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "Solver::updateLemmas() begin" << std::endl; |
2016 |
|
|
2017 |
|
// Avoid adding lemmas indefinitely without resource-out |
2018 |
263434 |
d_proxy->spendResource(Resource::LemmaStep); |
2019 |
|
|
2020 |
263434 |
CRef conflict = CRef_Undef; |
2021 |
|
|
2022 |
|
// Decision level to backtrack to |
2023 |
263434 |
int backtrackLevel = decisionLevel(); |
2024 |
|
|
2025 |
|
// We use this comparison operator |
2026 |
263434 |
lemma_lt lt(*this); |
2027 |
|
|
2028 |
|
// Check for propagation and level to backtrack to |
2029 |
263434 |
int i = 0; |
2030 |
790434 |
while (i < lemmas.size()) { |
2031 |
|
// We need this loop as when we backtrack, due to registration more lemmas could be added |
2032 |
4606480 |
for (; i < lemmas.size(); ++ i) |
2033 |
|
{ |
2034 |
|
// The current lemma |
2035 |
2171490 |
vec<Lit>& lemma = lemmas[i]; |
2036 |
|
|
2037 |
2171490 |
Trace("pf::sat") << "Solver::updateLemmas: working on lemma: "; |
2038 |
8914343 |
for (int k = 0; k < lemma.size(); ++k) { |
2039 |
6742853 |
Trace("pf::sat") << lemma[k] << " "; |
2040 |
|
} |
2041 |
2171490 |
Trace("pf::sat") << std::endl; |
2042 |
|
|
2043 |
|
// If it's an empty lemma, we have a conflict at zero level |
2044 |
2172731 |
if (lemma.size() == 0) { |
2045 |
1241 |
Assert(!options::unsatCores() && !needProof()); |
2046 |
1241 |
conflict = CRef_Lazy; |
2047 |
1241 |
backtrackLevel = 0; |
2048 |
1241 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "Solver::updateLemmas(): found empty clause" << std::endl; |
2049 |
1241 |
continue; |
2050 |
|
} |
2051 |
|
// Sort the lemma to be able to attach |
2052 |
2170249 |
sort(lemma, lt); |
2053 |
|
// See if the lemma propagates something |
2054 |
2170249 |
if (lemma.size() == 1 || value(lemma[1]) == l_False) { |
2055 |
469555 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "found unit " << lemma.size() << std::endl; |
2056 |
|
// This lemma propagates, see which level we need to backtrack to |
2057 |
469555 |
int currentBacktrackLevel = lemma.size() == 1 ? 0 : level(var(lemma[1])); |
2058 |
|
// Even if the first literal is true, we should propagate it at this level (unless it's set at a lower level) |
2059 |
469555 |
if (value(lemma[0]) != l_True || level(var(lemma[0])) > currentBacktrackLevel) { |
2060 |
452531 |
if (currentBacktrackLevel < backtrackLevel) { |
2061 |
153426 |
backtrackLevel = currentBacktrackLevel; |
2062 |
|
} |
2063 |
|
} |
2064 |
|
} |
2065 |
|
} |
2066 |
|
|
2067 |
|
// Pop so that propagation would be current |
2068 |
263500 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "Solver::updateLemmas(): backtracking to " << backtrackLevel << " from " << decisionLevel() << std::endl; |
2069 |
263500 |
cancelUntil(backtrackLevel); |
2070 |
|
} |
2071 |
|
|
2072 |
|
// Last index in the trail |
2073 |
263434 |
int backtrack_index = trail.size(); |
2074 |
|
|
2075 |
|
// Attach all the clauses and enqueue all the propagations |
2076 |
2434924 |
for (int j = 0; j < lemmas.size(); ++j) |
2077 |
|
{ |
2078 |
|
// The current lemma |
2079 |
2171490 |
vec<Lit>& lemma = lemmas[j]; |
2080 |
2171490 |
bool removable = lemmas_removable[j]; |
2081 |
|
|
2082 |
|
// Attach it if non-unit |
2083 |
2171490 |
CRef lemma_ref = CRef_Undef; |
2084 |
2171490 |
if (lemma.size() > 1) { |
2085 |
|
// If the lemmas is removable, we can compute its level by the level |
2086 |
2106525 |
int clauseLevel = assertionLevel; |
2087 |
2106525 |
if (removable && !assertionLevelOnly()) |
2088 |
|
{ |
2089 |
188694 |
clauseLevel = 0; |
2090 |
1598582 |
for (int k = 0; k < lemma.size(); ++k) |
2091 |
|
{ |
2092 |
1409888 |
clauseLevel = std::max(clauseLevel, intro_level(var(lemma[k]))); |
2093 |
|
} |
2094 |
|
} |
2095 |
|
|
2096 |
2106525 |
lemma_ref = ca.alloc(clauseLevel, lemma, removable); |
2097 |
2106525 |
if (removable) { |
2098 |
196561 |
clauses_removable.push(lemma_ref); |
2099 |
|
} else { |
2100 |
1909964 |
clauses_persistent.push(lemma_ref); |
2101 |
|
} |
2102 |
2106525 |
attachClause(lemma_ref); |
2103 |
|
} |
2104 |
|
|
2105 |
|
// If the lemma is propagating enqueue its literal (or set the conflict) |
2106 |
2171490 |
if (conflict == CRef_Undef && value(lemma[0]) != l_True) { |
2107 |
2082829 |
if (lemma.size() == 1 || (value(lemma[1]) == l_False && trail_index(var(lemma[1])) < backtrack_index)) { |
2108 |
694796 |
Trace("pf::sat") << "Solver::updateLemmas: unit theory lemma: " |
2109 |
347398 |
<< lemma[0] << std::endl; |
2110 |
347398 |
if (value(lemma[0]) == l_False) { |
2111 |
|
// We have a conflict |
2112 |
56382 |
if (lemma.size() > 1) { |
2113 |
55813 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "Solver::updateLemmas(): conflict" << std::endl; |
2114 |
55813 |
conflict = lemma_ref; |
2115 |
|
} else { |
2116 |
569 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "Solver::updateLemmas(): unit conflict or empty clause" << std::endl; |
2117 |
569 |
conflict = CRef_Lazy; |
2118 |
569 |
if (needProof()) |
2119 |
|
{ |
2120 |
48 |
d_pfManager->storeUnitConflict(lemma[0]); |
2121 |
|
} |
2122 |
|
} |
2123 |
|
} else { |
2124 |
291016 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "lemma size is " << lemma.size() << std::endl; |
2125 |
291016 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "lemma ref is " << lemma_ref << std::endl; |
2126 |
291016 |
uncheckedEnqueue(lemma[0], lemma_ref); |
2127 |
|
} |
2128 |
|
} |
2129 |
|
} |
2130 |
|
} |
2131 |
|
|
2132 |
|
// Clear the lemmas |
2133 |
263434 |
lemmas.clear(); |
2134 |
263434 |
lemmas_removable.clear(); |
2135 |
|
|
2136 |
263434 |
if (conflict != CRef_Undef) { |
2137 |
57536 |
theoryConflict = true; |
2138 |
|
} |
2139 |
|
|
2140 |
263434 |
Debug("minisat::lemmas") << "Solver::updateLemmas() end" << std::endl; |
2141 |
|
|
2142 |
263434 |
return conflict; |
2143 |
|
} |
2144 |
|
|
2145 |
6500105 |
void ClauseAllocator::reloc(CRef& cr, ClauseAllocator& to) |
2146 |
|
{ |
2147 |
6500105 |
Debug("minisat") << "ClauseAllocator::reloc: cr " << cr << std::endl; |
2148 |
|
// FIXME what is this CRef_lazy |
2149 |
6500105 |
if (cr == CRef_Lazy) return; |
2150 |
|
|
2151 |
6500105 |
Clause& c = operator[](cr); |
2152 |
6500105 |
if (c.reloced()) { cr = c.relocation(); return; } |
2153 |
|
|
2154 |
1938510 |
cr = to.alloc(c.level(), c, c.removable()); |
2155 |
1938510 |
c.relocate(cr); |
2156 |
|
// Copy extra data-fields: |
2157 |
|
// (This could be cleaned-up. Generalize Clause-constructor to be applicable here instead?) |
2158 |
1938510 |
to[cr].mark(c.mark()); |
2159 |
1938510 |
if (to[cr].removable()) to[cr].activity() = c.activity(); |
2160 |
1740652 |
else if (to[cr].has_extra()) to[cr].calcAbstraction(); |
2161 |
|
} |
2162 |
|
|
2163 |
3141257 |
inline bool Solver::withinBudget(Resource r) const |
2164 |
|
{ |
2165 |
3141257 |
Assert(d_proxy); |
2166 |
|
// spendResource sets async_interrupt or throws UnsafeInterruptException |
2167 |
|
// depending on whether hard-limit is enabled |
2168 |
3141257 |
d_proxy->spendResource(r); |
2169 |
|
|
2170 |
3141257 |
bool within_budget = |
2171 |
6282514 |
!asynch_interrupt && (conflict_budget < 0 || conflicts < conflict_budget) |
2172 |
6282514 |
&& (propagation_budget < 0 || propagations < propagation_budget); |
2173 |
3141257 |
return within_budget; |
2174 |
|
} |
2175 |
|
|
2176 |
2498 |
SatProofManager* Solver::getProofManager() |
2177 |
|
{ |
2178 |
2498 |
return isProofEnabled() ? d_pfManager.get() : nullptr; |
2179 |
|
} |
2180 |
|
|
2181 |
2823 |
std::shared_ptr<ProofNode> Solver::getProof() |
2182 |
|
{ |
2183 |
2823 |
return isProofEnabled() ? d_pfManager->getProof() : nullptr; |
2184 |
|
} |
2185 |
|
|
2186 |
39188611 |
bool Solver::isProofEnabled() const { return d_pfManager != nullptr; } |
2187 |
|
|
2188 |
39183290 |
bool Solver::needProof() const |
2189 |
|
{ |
2190 |
39183290 |
return isProofEnabled() |
2191 |
39183290 |
&& options::unsatCoresMode() != options::UnsatCoresMode::ASSUMPTIONS; |
2192 |
|
} |
2193 |
|
|
2194 |
|
} // namespace Minisat |
2195 |
29502 |
} // namespace cvc5 |