/******************************************************************************

 * Top contributors (to current version):

 *   Andrew Reynolds, Gereon Kremer

 *

 * This file is part of the cvc5 project.

 *

 * Copyright (c) 2009-2021 by the authors listed in the file AUTHORS

 * in the top-level source directory and their institutional affiliations.

 * All rights reserved.  See the file COPYING in the top-level source

 * directory for licensing information.

 * ****************************************************************************

 *

 * Model object for the non-linear extension class.

 */

#ifndef CVC5__THEORY__ARITH__NL__NL_MODEL_H

#define CVC5__THEORY__ARITH__NL__NL_MODEL_H

#include <map>

#include <unordered_map>

#include <vector>

#include "expr/kind.h"

#include "expr/node.h"

#include "expr/subs.h"

namespace cvc5 {

namespace context {

class Context;

}

namespace theory {

class TheoryModel;

namespace arith {

namespace nl {

class NlLemma;

class NonlinearExtension;

/** Non-linear model finder

 *

 * This class is responsible for all queries related to the (candidate) model

 * that is being processed by the non-linear arithmetic solver. It further

 * implements techniques for finding modifications to the current candidate

 * model in the case it can determine that a model exists. These include

 * techniques based on solving (quadratic) equations and bound analysis.

 */

{

  friend class NonlinearExtension;

 public:

  NlModel();

  ~NlModel();

  /**

   * This method is called once at the beginning of a last call effort check,

   * where m is the model of the theory of arithmetic. This method resets the

   * cache of computed model values.

   */

  void reset(TheoryModel* m, const std::map<Node, Node>& arithModel);

  /**

   * This method is called when the non-linear arithmetic solver restarts

   * its computation of lemmas and models during a last call effort check.

   */

  void resetCheck();

  /**

   * This computes model values for terms based on two semantics, a "concrete"

   * semantics and an "abstract" semantics.

   *

   * if isConcrete is true, this means compute the value of n based on its

   *          children recursively. (we call this its "concrete" value)

   * if isConcrete is false, this means lookup the value of n in the model.

   *          (we call this its "abstract" value)

   * In other words, !isConcrete treats multiplication terms and transcendental

   * function applications as variables, whereas isConcrete computes their

   * actual values based on the semantics of multiplication. This is a key

   * distinction used in the model-based refinement scheme in Cimatti et al.

   * TACAS 2017.

   *

   * For example, if M( a ) = 2, M( b ) = 3, M( a*b ) = 5, i.e. the variable

   * for a*b has been assigned a value 5 by the linear solver, then :

   *

   *   computeModelValue( a*b, true ) =

   *   computeModelValue( a, true )*computeModelValue( b, true ) = 2*3 = 6

   * whereas:

   *   computeModelValue( a*b, false ) = 5

   */

  Node computeConcreteModelValue(TNode n);

  Node computeAbstractModelValue(TNode n);

  Node computeModelValue(TNode n, bool isConcrete);

  /**

   * Compare arithmetic terms i and j based an ordering.

   *

   * This returns:

   *  -1 if i < j, 1 if i > j, or 0 if i == j

   *

   * If isConcrete is true, we consider the concrete model values of i and j,

   * otherwise, we consider their abstract model values. For definitions of

   * concrete vs abstract model values, see NlModel::computeModelValue.

   *

   * If isAbsolute is true, we compare the absolute value of the above

   * values.

   */

  int compare(TNode i, TNode j, bool isConcrete, bool isAbsolute);

  /**

   * Compare arithmetic terms i and j based an ordering.

   *

   * This returns:

   *  -1 if i < j, 1 if i > j, or 0 if i == j

   *

   * If isAbsolute is true, we compare the absolute value of i and j

   */

  int compareValue(TNode i, TNode j, bool isAbsolute) const;

  //------------------------------ recording model substitutions and bounds

  /**

   * Adds the model substitution v -> s. This applies the substitution

   * { v -> s } to each term in d_substitutions and then adds v,s to

   * d_substitutions.

   * If this method returns false, then the substitution v -> s is inconsistent

   * with the current substitution and bounds.

   */

  bool addSubstitution(TNode v, TNode s);

  /**

   * Adds the bound x -> < l, u > to the map above, and records the

   * approximation ( x, l <= x <= u ) in the model. This method returns false

   * if the bound is inconsistent with the current model substitution or

   * bounds.

   */

  bool addBound(TNode v, TNode l, TNode u);

  /**

   * Adds a model witness v -> w to the underlying theory model.

   * The witness should only contain a single variable v and evaluate to true

   * for exactly one value of v. The variable v is then (implicitly,

   * declaratively) assigned to this single value that satisfies the witness w.

   */

  bool addWitness(TNode v, TNode w);

  /**

   * Checks the current model based on solving for equalities, and using error

   * bounds on the Taylor approximation.

   *

   * If this function returns true, then all assertions in the input argument

   * "assertions" are satisfied for all interpretations of variables within

   * their computed bounds (as stored in d_check_model_bounds).

   *

   * For details, see Section 3 of Cimatti et al CADE 2017 under the heading

   * "Detecting Satisfiable Formulas".

   *

   * d is a degree indicating how precise our computations are.

   */

  bool checkModel(const std::vector<Node>& assertions,

                  unsigned d,

                  std::vector<NlLemma>& lemmas);

  /**

   * Set that we have used an approximation during this check. This flag is

   * reset on a call to resetCheck. It is set when we use reasoning that

   * is limited by a degree of precision we are using. In other words, if we

   * used an approximation, then we maybe could still establish a lemma or

   * determine the input is SAT if we increased our precision.

   */

  void setUsedApproximate();

  /** Did we use an approximation during this check? */

  bool usedApproximate() const;

  //------------------------------ end recording model substitutions and bounds

  /**

   * This prints both the abstract and concrete model values for arithmetic

   * term n on Trace c with precision prec.

   */

  void printModelValue(const char* c, Node n, unsigned prec = 5) const;

  /**

   * This gets mappings that indicate how to repair the model generated by the

   * linear arithmetic solver. This method should be called after a successful

   * call to checkModel above.

   *

   * The mapping arithModel is updated by this method to map arithmetic terms v

   * to their (exact) value that was computed during checkModel; the mapping

   * approximations is updated to store approximate values in the form of a

   * pair (P, w), where P is a predicate that describes the possible values of

   * v and w is a witness point that satisfies this predicate; the mapping

   * witnesses is filled with witness terms that are satisfied by a single

   * value.

   */

  void getModelValueRepair(

      std::map<Node, Node>& arithModel,

      std::map<Node, std::pair<Node, Node>>& approximations,

      std::map<Node, Node>& witnesses,

      bool witnessToValue);

 private:

  /** Cache for concrete model values */

  std::map<Node, Node> d_concreteModelCache;

  /** Cache for abstract model values */

  std::map<Node, Node> d_abstractModelCache;

  /** The current model */

  TheoryModel* d_model;

  /**

   * The values that the arithmetic theory solver assigned in the model. This

   * corresponds to the set of equalities that linear solver (via TheoryArith)

   * is currently sending to TheoryModel during collectModelValues, plus

   * additional entries x -> 0 for variables that were unassigned by the linear

   * solver.

   */

  std::map<Node, Node> d_arithVal;

  /**

   * A substitution from variables that appear in assertions to a solved form

   * term.

   */

  Subs d_substitutions;

  /** Get the model value of n from the model object above */

  Node getValueInternal(TNode n);

  /**

   * Have we assigned v in the current checkModel(...) call?

   *

   * This method returns true if variable v is in the domain of

   * d_check_model_bounds or if it occurs in d_substitutions.

   */

  bool hasAssignment(Node v) const;

  /**

   * Checks whether we have a linear model value for v, i.e. whether v is

   * contained in d_arithVal. If so, we also store the value that v is mapped

   * to in val.

   */

  bool hasLinearModelValue(TNode v, Node& val) const;

  //---------------------------check model

  /**

   * This method is used during checkModel(...). It takes as input an

   * equality eq. If it returns true, then eq is correct-by-construction based

   * on the information stored in our model representation (see

   * d_substitutions, d_check_model_bounds), and eq

   * is added to d_check_model_solved. The equality eq may involve any

   * number of variables, and monomials of arbitrary degree. If this method

   * returns false, then we did not show that the equality was true in the

   * model. This method uses incomplete techniques based on interval

   * analysis and quadratic equation solving.

   *

   * If it can be shown that the equality must be false in the current

   * model, then we may add a lemma to lemmas explaining why this is the case.

   * For instance, if eq reduces to a univariate quadratic equation with no

   * root, we send a conflict clause of the form a*x^2 + b*x + c != 0.

   */

  bool solveEqualitySimple(Node eq, unsigned d, std::vector<NlLemma>& lemmas);

  /**

   * simple check model for transcendental functions for literal

   *

   * This method returns true if literal is true for all interpretations of

   * transcendental functions within their error bounds (as stored

   * in d_check_model_bounds). This is determined by a simple under/over

   * approximation of the value of sum of (linear) monomials. For example,

   * if we determine that .8 < sin( 1 ) < .9, this function will return

   * true for literals like:

   *   2.0*sin( 1 ) > 1.5

   *   -1.0*sin( 1 ) < -0.79

   *   -1.0*sin( 1 ) > -0.91

   *   sin( 1 )*sin( 1 ) + sin( 1 ) > 0.0

   * It will return false for literals like:

   *   sin( 1 ) > 0.85

   * It will also return false for literals like:

   *   -0.3*sin( 1 )*sin( 2 ) + sin( 2 ) > .7

   *   sin( sin( 1 ) ) > .5

   * since the bounds on these terms cannot quickly be determined.

   */

  bool simpleCheckModelLit(Node lit);

  bool simpleCheckModelMsum(const std::map<Node, Node>& msum, bool pol);

  //---------------------------end check model

  /** commonly used terms */

  Node d_zero;

  Node d_one;

  Node d_two;

  Node d_true;

  Node d_false;

  Node d_null;

  /**

   * lower and upper bounds for check model

   *

   * For each term t in the domain of this map, if this stores the pair

   * (c_l, c_u) then the model M is such that c_l <= M( t ) <= c_u.

   *

   * We add terms whose value is approximated in the model to this map, which

   * includes:

   * (1) applications of transcendental functions, whose value is approximated

   * by the Taylor series,

   * (2) variables we have solved quadratic equations for, whose value

   * involves approximations of square roots.

   */

  std::map<Node, std::pair<Node, Node>> d_check_model_bounds;

  /**

   * witnesses for check model

   *

   * Stores witnesses for vatiables that define implicit variable assignments.

   * For some variable v, we map to a formulas that is true for exactly one

   * value of v.

   */

  std::map<Node, Node> d_check_model_witnesses;

  /**

   * The map from literals that our model construction solved, to the variable

   * that was solved for. Examples of such literals are:

   * (1) Equalities x = t, which we turned into a model substitution x -> t,

   * where x not in FV( t ), and

   * (2) Equalities a*x*x + b*x + c = 0, which we turned into a model bound

   * -b+s*sqrt(b*b-4*a*c)/2a - E <= x <= -b+s*sqrt(b*b-4*a*c)/2a + E.

   *

   * These literals are exempt from check-model, since they are satisfied by

   * definition of our model construction.

   */

  std::unordered_map<Node, Node> d_check_model_solved;

  /** did we use an approximation on this call to last-call effort? */

  bool d_used_approx;

}; /* class NlModel */

}  // namespace nl

}  // namespace arith

}  // namespace theory

}  // namespace cvc5

#endif /* CVC5__THEORY__ARITH__NONLINEAR_EXTENSION_H */